Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/672,792

METHOD FOR PRODUCING CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER PANELS WITH CUTOUTS AND WOODEN PANEL PRODUCTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
Jun 19, 2023 — DE 10 2023 116 006.0
Examiner
KATCOFF, MATTHEW GORDON
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Minda Industrieanlagen GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
670 granted / 967 resolved
-0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
989
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
73.3%
+33.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. For claim 1, the step of “a) dividing the boards in rows in which the cutouts are located into individual boards to create the cutouts in the at least one longitudinal layer” is indefinite as it is unclear what applicant is claiming. For instance, is the dividing step a cutting step or simply an arranging step. Additionally it is unclear if, in this step, applicant is cutting a cutout into boards, if the cutouts were already present in the boards or if the cutouts are formed form the combination of individual boards. If it is the former, it is also unclear if the cutouts are being formed in all of the individual boards, some of the individual boards or something else. For the purpose of examination it is assumed applicant is claiming cutting a cutout. For claim 8, the phrase “a cut-off device configured to divide the boards in rows, in which cutouts are located, into individual boards to produce the cutouts in the at least one longitudinal layer” is indefinite as again it is unclear what this device is doing. Is it cutting boards to form rows or is it simply arranging the boards into rows or is it cutting into the boards to form cutouts? For the purpose of examination it is assumed applicant is claiming cutting a cutout. Conclusion The closest prior art is WO 2012/048793 which discloses arranging boards to form a layer with cutouts (23, 24) and also forming another layer which is rotated by 90 degrees relative to the first layer (¶21). The layers are glued together (¶23). Other prior art cited on the PTO-892 discloses various methods and apparatus for forming laminated panels. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Matthew Katcoff whose telephone number is (571)270-1415. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 8-4, Fri: Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Templeton can be reached at (571) 270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Matthew Katcoff/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725 04/03/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623370
MORTISING JIG
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622369
DEVICE FOR HARVESTING TIMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611677
BEARING ARRANGEMENT OF A HORIZONTAL GRINDING MILL AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE FILL RATE OF THE MILL
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12583145
ROUTER ATTACHMENT ADAPTOR AND COVER FOR SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582994
MODULAR SHREDDER RING FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN WASTE DISPOSER AND RELATED METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+15.7%)
3y 2m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month