Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/672,793

BICYCLE TRAINER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 23, 2024
Examiner
ANDERSON, MEGAN M
Art Unit
3784
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sram LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
544 granted / 724 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
746
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§112
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 724 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Detailed Action This is the First Office Action on the Merits based on the 18/672,793 application filed on 05/23/2024 and which claims as originally filed have been considered in the ensuing action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/20/2023 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the A third axis separate from the first and second axis (at least claim 5) The resistance unit comprising two or more of a fan, magnetic wheel, fluid resistance chamber, electric generator or centrifugal pressure plate (at least claim 8, 19) The resistance unit comprising one of a fan, magnetic wheel, fluid resistance chamber, or centrifugal pressure plate AND a close loop component of claims 5 and 16 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 3, “the axle supports” should be corrected to –the pair of laterally spaced axle supports--- Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 2, “the axle supports” should be corrected to –the pair of laterally spaced axle supports--- Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 1, “the axle supports” should be corrected to –the pair of laterally spaced axle supports--- Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 1, “the channel” should be corrected to ---the upwardly opening channel---- On line 2, “the axle” should be corrected to ---the rear wheel axle--- Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 3, “the axle supports” should be corrected to –the pair of laterally spaced axle supports--- On line 4, “the axle” should be corrected to ---the rear wheel axle--- Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 12, “the axle supports” should be corrected to –the pair of laterally spaced axle supports--- Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 3, “the chain” should be corrected to ---the drive chain--- Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: On line 1, “the axle supports” should be corrected to –the pair of laterally spaced axle supports--- On line 3, “the channel” should be corrected to ---the upwardly opening channel---- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 9-12 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al (US 9,884,237). Regarding claim 1: Wang et al disclose a frame (base frame 10) comprising a pair of laterally spaced axle supports (see annotated Fig. below) configured to support a rear wheel axle of a bicycle (see Fig. 7, showing a rear wheel of a bicycle attached to the base frame at the axle supports), wherein the axle supports define a laterally extending first axis (see annotated Fig. below); a drive wheel (roller 24) rotatably supported by the frame, wherein the drive wheel is rotatable about a second axis parallel to, and radially spaced from, the first axis (see annotated Fig. below); and a resistance unit (damper unit 20) supported by the frame and operably coupled to the drive wheel (see Fig. 1). [AltContent: textbox (Second axis)][AltContent: textbox (First axis)][AltContent: textbox (First axis)][AltContent: textbox (First axis)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: textbox (First axis)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: textbox (Laterally spaced axle supports)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 601 482 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2: Wang et al disclose that the resistance unit is positioned rearwardly of the axle supports, and wherein the second axis is positioned rearwardly of the first axis (see annotated Fig. above). Regarding claim 9: Wang et al disclose that at least one of the axle supports comprises an upwardly opening channel (see Fig. 1 showing that the axle support has a U-shaped channel, with the opening extending upwardly). Regarding claim 10: Wang et al disclose that the channel comprises a bottom recess shaped to receive one end of the axle, wherein the bottom recess defines the first axis (see Fig. 7, specifically). Regarding claim 11: Wang et al disclose a frame (base frame 10) comprising a pair of laterally spaced axle supports (see annotated Fig. below); a bicycle (the bicycle is shown in Fig. 8) comprising a rear wheel axle (shown in Fig. 7-8; the rear wheel of the bicycle is configured to be placed within the axle supports) removably supported by the axle supports, wherein the axle defines a laterally extending first axis (see annotated Fig. below); a drive wheel (roller 24) rotatably supported by the frame, wherein the drive wheel is rotatable about a second axis parallel to, and radially spaced from, the first axis (see annotated Fig. below); and a resistance unit (damper unit 20) supported by the frame and operably coupled to the drive wheel (see Fig. 1). PNG media_image2.png 460 625 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12: Wang et al disclose that the resistance unit is positioned rearwardly of the axle supports, and wherein the second axis is positioned rearwardly of the first axis (see annotated Fig. above). Regarding claim 20: Wang et al disclose that at least one of the axle supports comprises an upwardly opening channel (see Fig. 1 showing that the axle support has a U-shaped channel, with the opening extending upwardly), and wherein the rear wheel axle comprises an end disposed in the channel (see Figs. 1-8). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-8 and 13-19, in which claims 4-8 and 14-19 are dependent upon claims 3 and 13 respectively, are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to teach or disclose the bicycle trainer of independent claims and further comprising a cog rotatably supported by the frame about the second axis, the cog being laterally spaced from the drive wheel (claims 3 and 13). The closest prior art of record comprises Wang et al (US 9,884,237) and Shu-Chiung (US 2013/0053223). Wang et al is discussed in detail above. Wang et al fails to disclose a cog, among other limitations. Shu-Chiung teaches a training apparatus for use with a bicycle, wherein the rear fork is attached to the axle of a cassette of the device. Shu-Chiung further discloses toothed pulley (23, broadly interpreted as a cog) that is rotatable about a second axis that is shared with dampening wheel (30), spaced apart, but parallel to the axis of rotation of the axle of the rear fork. Shu-Chiung fails to disclose a pair of laterally spaced axle supports, and that the cog is configured share an axis with the drive wheel and not the dampening wheel. PNG media_image3.png 505 463 media_image3.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEGAN M ANDERSON whose telephone number is (313)446-6531. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6 a.m. -4 p.m. (Arizona). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LoAn Jimenez can be reached at 571-272-4966. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Megan Anderson/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599826
RAGE RELIEVING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12576299
EXERCISE AND THERAPY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564759
STAIR STEPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558584
Resistance adjustment device of exercise apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12558592
TREADMILL CAPABLE OF ADJUSTING SLOPE RISING AND FALLING BY SCREW ROD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.1%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 724 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month