Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/673,154

LOADING NON-PLAYER CHARACTERS IN CURRENT RANGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 23, 2024
Examiner
CUFF, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
580 granted / 708 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 708 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 11, 17 and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (加田 健志, JP 6114848) in view of Genova (US PG pub 2012/0176366). 加田 健志 shows all of the limitations of the claims except for specifying the use of non-player characters (NPCs) in a virtual environment. 加田 健志 shows, In regards to claims 1, 17 and 20, determining a query distance range based on current position information of a character controlled by a user in a virtual scene; (figure 7, user 1, virtual reality space 510, field of view 520) determining data for a plurality of users from a database based on users to be placed in the query distance range, (storage unit 320 is considered a database with user state attributes.) wherein the data includes a plurality of attributes (distance and bearing to user 1) respectively corresponding to each of the plurality of the users; determining, by processing circuitry, weights (distance and bearing to user 1) for each of the plurality of users; generating a first number of users based on a descending order of the weights for each of the plurality of users (distance and bearing to user 1. See the 7 users in field of view based on descending order of distance.), wherein the first number of users is a subset (2-8) of the plurality of users (2-18); and transmitting the generated first number of users to a client controlling the player-controlled character, to cause the client to display, in the query distance range, virtual images corresponding to the first number of users. (Figure 1 shows the hardware and transmitting paths to display the field of view in figure 7.) In regards to claim 11, wherein the determining the query distance range based on the current position information comprises one of: determining the query distance range based on a field of view of a first-person perspective or a third-person perspective based on the current position information; (figure 7) or determining the query distance range based on a geometric area of a predetermined size centered on the current position information. Genova et al. teaches, figure 1c, rendering NPCs in a virtual environment in a field of view (see paragraph [0071]). Based on the teaching of Genova, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the 加田 健志 invention to incorporate NPCs in addition or replacement of the users in order to expand the use of virtual characters in the scene. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10, 12-16 and 18-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regards to 35 USC 101, a streamline analysis shows that the claimed virtual environment is patent eligible. In regards to art, many of the dependent claims provide detailed limitations which are not shown or taught by the cited prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A CUFF whose telephone number is (571)272-6778. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571 272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL A CUFF/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 13, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582907
DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582914
GAME MANAGEMENT DEVICE, GAME MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558632
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551803
WORD GAME SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551795
AUTOMATED PERSONALIZED VIDEO GAME GUIDANCE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 708 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month