Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/673,293

TESTING CABLE AND TESTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
Feb 02, 2024 — CN 202410151995.5
Examiner
HYEON, HAE M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fulian Precision Electronics (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1033 granted / 1208 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1225
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1208 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because of the following problems. Lines 1-2, the second occurring “a mother board, a storage card” should be -- the mother board, the storage card” because line 1 already recites, “a mother board and a storage card”. Line 2, “The mother board connector” should be -- A mother board connector -- because there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Line 3, “The storage card connector” should be -- A storage card connector -- because there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Line 4, “The connecting cable” should be -- A connecting cable -- because there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: TESTING CABLE FOR CONNECTING A MOTHER BOARD WITH A STORAGE CARD. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Paragraph [0018], line 1, the first occurring abbreviation “PCIe” should be written with a full terminology with the abbreviation enclosed within a parenthesis. Paragraph [0027], line 2, the first occurring abbreviation “UV” should be written with a full terminology with the abbreviation enclosed within a parenthesis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 9, line 3, the examiner suggests the applicant to delete the reference number “30” after “the connecting cable” because the other limitations in claim 9 do not have their corresponding reference numbers. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. In the independent claims 1 and 11, claim 1, lines 6-7 and claim 11, lines 9-10 recite, the same limitation, “a monitor located on the connecting cable and configured for monitoring the connecting cable, the mother board connector, and the storage card connector”. It is not clear how the monitor on the connecting cable is configured for monitoring the connecting cable, the mother board connector, and the storage card connector. Paragraph [0033] describes and Figure 6 clearly shows that the monitor 50 on the cable 30 only has an indicator light 51. And Paragraph [0033] further describes that when the connecting cable 30 is functional, the indicator light 51 is light on but when the connecting cable 30 is damaged, the indicator light 51 is light off. Therefore, users can determine whether the wire harness is damaged based on the status of indicator light 51. From Paragraph [0033], it is clear that the monitor 50 with the indicator light 51 only configured to monitor the status of the connecting cable 30, but not the mother board connector 10 and the storage card connector 20. In conclusion, it is not clear and not able to understand how the monitor 50 can also configured to monitor the mother board connector 10 and the storage card connector 20 along with the connecting cable 30 when the monitor 50 only monitors the status of the wire harness of the connecting cable 30. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAE MOON HYEON whose telephone number is (571) 272-2093. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:30 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /hmh/ /Hae Moon Hyeon/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706406
CONNECTOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702768
ELECTRONIC INHALATION DEVICE INCLUDING A TRANSMITTER CONTROLLABLE BY A RECEIVER
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695258
ELECTRONIC ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689165
PUSH/PULL INTERFACE FOR COAXIAL CABLES WITH SECURE GROUND CONNECTION
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683342
COAXIAL CONNECTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1208 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month