Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/673,358

ACCESSORY DEVICES OF AN OSTOMY SYSTEM, AND RELATED METHODS FOR CHANGING AN OSTOMY APPLIANCE BASED ON FUTURE OPERATING STATE

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
Feb 20, 2018 — DK PA 2018 70109 +2 more
Examiner
SURYAWANSHI, SURESH
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Coloplast A/S
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
962 granted / 1088 resolved
+33.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1108
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1088 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 29-34 and 36-49 are presented for examination. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 29-34, 36-41, and 43 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-6, 8, 13, 17, 24-25, and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 12029582. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both claim the same inventio of monitoring a base plate of an ostomy appliance via an accessory device and the current application claims the inventio broadly. A comparison between the independent claim 1 of the US Patent 12029582 and independent claim 29 of the current application is provided below for an example. US Patent 12029582 Current Application 18/673358 Claim 1. A method, performed in an accessory device, for a base plate of an ostomy appliance, wherein the accessory device comprises an interface configured to communicate with one or more devices of an ostomy system, the interface comprising a display, wherein the ostomy system comprises a monitor device, and/or the ostomy appliance configured to be placed on a skin surface of a user, wherein the ostomy appliance comprises the base plate, the method comprising: obtaining monitor data from the monitor device; determining a current operating state of the base plate on the monitor data, the current operating state indicative of current adhesive performance of the base plate; determining a future operating state of the base plate on the monitor data and/or the current operating state, the future operating state indicative of future adhesive performance of the base plate; and displaying, on the display, a first user interface screen comprising a first primary user interface object representing the current operating state and/or a first secondary user interface object representing the future operating state. Claim 29. A method, performed in an accessory device, for a base plate of an ostomy appliance, the method comprising: obtaining, from a monitor device coupled to the base plate, monitor data; generating a current operating state of the base plate based on the monitor data; generating a future operating state of the base plate based on the current operating state; and displaying, on a display of the accessory device, a user interface screen comprising an indication of the determined generated future operating state of the base plate. Claims 44-49 are objected as these are based on rejected parent claim(s). The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20160357232 discloses systems and methods of preparing a future operating state for a future processing task on an electronic processing device, taking into account the current operating state of the electronic processing device. US-20130116830 discloses systems and methods for predicting transient operational characteristics of a power plant using a power plant dynamics model for determining a current operating state of the power plant and predicting one or more future operating parameters associated with power plant based at least in part on the determined current operating state. N. DE-60218384 discloses information processing apparatus and power control method wherein in an agent is used for detecting a current operating state of a device and predicting a future operating state of the device based on the detected current operating state. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SURESH K SURYAWANSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-3668. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth M Lo can be reached at 5712729774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SURESH SURYAWANSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Aug 18, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771132
UTILIZING POWER INFRASTRUCTURE TO PROVIDE STABLE REFERENCE FREQUENCY
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760921
HVAC SENSOR INFORMATION AND SENSOR COMMUNICATION OVER RELAY-CONTROLLED POWER LINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760753
PUMP CALIBRATION SYSTEM AND PUMP CALIBRATION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12743060
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING FOR AUTOMATED DEVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741397
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING SURFACE PROFILES OF WAFERS SLICED IN A WIRE SAW
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1088 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month