Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/673,507

POWDER COATING COMPOSITION, COATING FILM, FLUORORESIN LAMINATE, AND ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
Nov 26, 2021 — JP 2021-191912 +1 more
Examiner
AHMED, SHEEBA
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Daikin Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
909 granted / 1126 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1156
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1126 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Torii et al. (US 2006/0063889 A1). Torii et al. disclose a coating composition including an amide group-containable macromolecule compound (A) having an amide group or to have an amide group (equivalent to the amide group-containable polymer compound (A) that has an amide group of the claimed invention as recited in claim 1) and an anti-oxidizing material (B) (equivalent to component B of the claimed invention as recited in claim 1) wherein the anti-oxidizing material (B) includes poly(arylene sulfide) (PAS); and the PAS is not particularly limited and includes poly (phenylene sulfide ketone), poly (phenylene sulfide sulfone), poly (biphenylene sulfide) and poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS). In particular, PPS is suitably used (meeting the limitation that component B is polyphenylene sulfide, as recited in claim 1). The anti-oxidizing material (B) accounts for 0.1 to 20 mass % of a total amount of said amide group-containable macromolecule compound (A) and the anti-oxidizing material (B) (meeting the limitation that a content of the polyphenylene sulfide (B) is 1 to 50% by mass of a total of the amide group-containable polymer compound (A) and the polyphenylene sulfide (B), as recited in claim 1). The amide group-containable macromolecule compound (A) is an amide group-containing polymer (a1) having an amide group and an aromatic ring, and/or an amide group-containing-polymer precursor (a2) to convert into the amide group-containing polymer (a1) by baking at a time of coating with said coating composition (meeting the limitation that the amide group-containable polymer compound (A) is an amide group-containing polymer (al) having an amide group and an aromatic ring and/or an amide group-containing polymer precursor (a2) that changes to the amide group-containing polymer (al) in a sintering step when forming the powder coating material composition into a film, as recited in claim 1). Preferably, the coating composition further comprises a fluororesin (C) (equivalent to the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) of the claimed invention, as recited in claim 1) having a melting temperature of, for instance, 310 C. The coating composition comprising the fluororesin (C) can form, by coating, a coating film structurally separated into two layers of a first layer (front layer) based on the fluororesin (C) and a second layer based on the amide group-containable macromolecule compound (A) and the anti-oxidizing material (B). In case of laminating a fluororesin layer comprising a fluororesin (D) (equivalent to the perfluorinated fluororesin (D) of claim 3) on the first layer. The fluororesin (C) comprises a polymer obtained by polymerizing a monomer having fluorine. The fluororesin (C) preferably comprises a fluorine-containing polymer obtained by polymerizing one or more kinds of fluorine-containing monomers selected from the group of fluorine-containing monomers consisting of chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE), trifluoroethylene, tetrafluoroethylene (TFE), (meeting the limitation that the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) comprises tetrafluoroethylene, as recited in claim 1), hexafluoropropylene (HFP), vinylidene fluoride (VdF), and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl)ether (PAVE) (equivalent to the perfluoroalkyl vinyl ether of claim 4). The fluororesin (C) comprising tetrafluoroethylene-based copolymer is more preferable in view of corrosion resistance and perfluororesins are preferably employed in the view of having both corrosion resistance and heat resistance. As the trace comonomer, there can be used one or more kinds of fluorine-free monomers and/or fluorine-containing monomers not being the perfluoroolefines nor perfluorovinylether as mentioned above. Preferably, a repeating unit derived from the trace comonomer in a molecular chain of the perfluoro polymers is less than 10 mol % of all monomer units of the perfluoro polymers (meeting the limitations of claim 4). Preferably, the fluororesin (C) accounts for 50 to 90 mass % of the total amount of the amide group-containable macromolecule compound (A), the anti-oxidizing material (B) and the fluororesin (C) (meeting the limitation that the content of the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) is 50.0 to 95.0% by mass of a total of the amide group-containable polymer compound (A), the polyphenylene sulfide (B), and the perfluorinated fluororesin (C), as recited in claim 1). The coating composition can be produced whether it is of a powder coating material type (meeting the limitation that the composition is a powder coating material composition, as recited in claim 1) or of a liquid coating material type. The coating composition according to the present invention can suitably be used as a primer composition. (meeting the limitation that the coating material composition is an undercoating material composition for a fluororesin layer comprising a perfluorinated fluororesin (D), as recited in claim 3). The fluororesin layer is formed on the coating film, and comprises a fluororesin (D) (also meeting the limitations of claim 4) and as the fluororesin (D), there may be used the same one as the fluororesin (C) when the coating composition according to the present invention does not comprise the fluororesin (C). Preferably, the fluororesin layer has a film thickness of 200 microns or more (meeting the limitations of claim 8). The fluoro-laminate according to the disclosed invention comprises the article to be coated, the coating film and the fluororesin layer (meeting the limitations of claim 6, 7, and 9) and the fluoro-laminate comprises an article to be coated, a coating film obtained by coating with said coating composition onto an article to be coated, and a fluororesin layer, wherein said fluororesin layer comprises a fluororesin (D), and said article to be coated, said coating film and said fluororesin layer are laminated in this order. (See Abstract and paragraphs 0017, 0018, 0020-0029, 0034-0042, 0054-0064, 0070-0075, 0079-0083, 0092-0099, 0124-0131, 0144-0147, and 0166). With regards to the limitation that the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) has a melting point of 250 to 320°C (as recited in claim 5) and that the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) has a melt flow rate (MFR) in a range of 5 to 30 (g/10 min) (as recited in claim 1), the Examiner takes the position that such property limitations are inherent in the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) taught by Torii et al. given that the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) taught by Torii et al. and that of the claimed invention are identical. Similarly, with regards to the limitation that the apparent density of the powder coating material is 0.50 to 1.00 (g/mL) (as recited in claim 1), the Examiner takes the position that such a property limitation is inherent in the powder coating material taught by Torii et al. given that the powder coating material taught by Torii et al. and that of the claimed invention are identical. With regards to the limitation that the perfluorinated fluororesin (C) comprises tetrafluoroethylene in a range of 85.0 to 99.5 mol% and the powder coating material has an average particle size of 10 to 50 µm, the Examiner would like to point out that workable physical properties such as concentrations and particle sizes are deemed to be obvious routine optimizations to one of ordinary skill in the art, motivated by the desire to obtain the required properties, particularly given that Torii et al. specifically teach that the tetrafluoroethylene-based copolymers are preferably employed in the view of having both corrosion resistance and heat resistance. Conclusion 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEEBA AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-1504. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CALLIE SHOSHO can be reached at 571-272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEEBA AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674232
LAMINATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LAMINATE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668046
COMPOSITE STRUCTURE DENTAL ORTHODONTIC SHEET AND DENTAL ORTHODONTIC DEVICE USING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664964
AN ACOUSTIC DAMPING ELEMENT WITH IMPROVED STACKABILITY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654400
SINGULATION AND EDGE-SEALING OF MULTILAYER POLYMER EYEPIECE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12630346
A MULTI-LAYER FLEXIBLE PACKAGING MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 10m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1126 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month