Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/673,670

SECURE CONTROLLER OPERATION AND MALWARE PREVENTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
Apr 06, 2016 — provisional 62/319,178 +6 more
Examiner
TRAN, TRI MINH
Art Unit
2432
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Karamba Security Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
459 granted / 560 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
568
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
83.1%
+43.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 23 is pending. Claims 1-22 are canceled. This application is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/IB2017/051964 filed on April 5, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 62/319,178, filed on April 6, 2016, and U.S. Application Serial No. 62/346,856, filed on June 7, 2016. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by 20170090929 (hereinafter Muttik) Regarding claim 23, Muttik discloses a non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations for customized code execution flow integrity for a controller, comprising: embedding, in a controller, customized and controller-specific code execution flow inspection code, the controller-specific code execution flow inspection code being configured to: (Fig. 4, par. [0010]-[0018] and [0077]-[0079] disclose a four-core CPU having a program flow monitoring code called CMU which can be an integrated part of the CPU, using an execution control data (ECD) for each program to be analyzed to ensure that they are consistent with the expected ECD. The analysis extracts execution control data (ECD) about the expected software behavior, including code flow and data flows). compare a request for execution of code by the controller to a map of a permitted sequence of calls between controller code elements executable by the controller, the permitted sequence of calls including at least one process call or at least one function call (Figs. 5-6 and par. [0081]-[0100] disclose the correctness monitoring unit CMU compares the instruction pointers, function’s addresses and data types to the ECD’s control and data flows. If there is a mismatch it raises an exception); determine whether the request for execution of code by the controller conflicts with the map of the permitted sequence (same citation of Figs. 5-6 and related text); implement, based on the determination, a control action to prevent the implement, based on the determination, a control action to prevent the request for execution of code by the controller that conflicts with the map of the permitted sequence of calls from being executed on the controller (Fig. 6 and related text disclose an exception is raised if a mismatch is found). Inquiry communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRI M TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1994. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Nickerson can be reached at (469)295-9235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRI M TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2432
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639438
JUST IN TIME MEMORY ANALYSIS FOR MALWARE DETECTION
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639470
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR DATA ENCRYPTION AND APPLICATION-AGNOSTIC QUERYING OF ENCRYPTED DATA
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632553
METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING COMPROMISED DEVICES IN AN APPLICATION INFRASTRUCTURE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627657
COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WEARABLE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625960
METHODS FOR FILTERING AND FOR QUALIFYING SECURITY EVENTS OF AN INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.0%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month