Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/674,250

MASCARA FORMULATION

Non-Final OA §103§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
May 26, 2023 — provisional 63/469,164
Examiner
PACKARD, BENJAMIN J
Art Unit
1612
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Mary Kay Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
905 granted / 1352 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
1414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1352 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicants' arguments, filed 07/09/2026, have been fully considered. Rejections and/or objections not reiterated from previous office actions are hereby withdrawn. The following rejections and/or objections are either reiterated or newly applied. They constitute the complete set presently being applied to the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 16, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Norman (US 20150265507) in view of Patel (US 8,992,899), Lange (US 20080193404), and Loginova (US 2007/0190010). Applicants assert Norman, Patel, and Lange fail to disclose “triacontanyl polyvinylpyrrolidone” as a single component, rather than separate components. Loginova is now cited for teaching triacontanyl PVP was a well-known polymer used in mascara formulations, with triacontanyl PVP and polyethylene and PVP/Eicosene as particularly preferred. (¶¶ 25-26, it is noted triacontanyl appears misspelled in the prior art). As such, it would have been obvious to use well known and preferred polymers in the mascara previously made obvious. Claim 3, 4, 8, 11, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Norman (US 20150265507), Patel (US 8,992,899), Lange (US 20080193404) and Loginova (US 2007/0190010), in view of Feng (US 20070212316). Applicants assert Feng does not cure the deficiency of Normal, Patel, and Lange. Loginova is discussed above for resolving the deficiency. Claim 12, 13, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Norman (US 20150265507), Patel (US 8,992,899), Lange (US 20080193404), and Loginova (US 2007/0190010), in view of Schlossman (US 20090257966). Applicants assert Schlossman does not cure the deficiency of Normal, Patel, and Lange. Loginova is discussed above for resolving the deficiency. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Norman (US 20150265507), Patel (US 8,992,899), Lange (US 20080193404) and Loginova (US 2007/0190010), in view of Gupta (US 20060110415). Applicants assert Gupta does not cure the deficiency of Normal, Patel, and Lange. Loginova is discussed above for resolving the deficiency. Claim 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Norman (US 20150265507) in view of Patel (US 8,992,899), Lange (US 20080193404), Loginova (US 2007/0190010), Feng (US 20070212316), Schlossman (US 20090257966), and Gupta (US 20060110415). Applicants assert the combination does not cure the deficiency of Normal, Patel, and Lange. Loginova is discussed above for resolving the deficiency. Double Patenting Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,857,079 in view of Patel (US 8,992,899), Lange (US 20080193404), Loginova (US 2007/0190010), Feng (US 20070212316), Schlossman (US 20090257966), and Gupta (US 20060110415). Allan is included to resolve the deficiency. The rejection is also being held in abeyance until allowable matter is found. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN J PACKARD whose telephone number is (571)270-3440. The examiner can normally be reached Mon 2-6pm and Tues-Fri 9:30am-6:30pm + mid-day flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sahana S. Kaup can be reached at (571) 272-6897. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN J PACKARD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §DOUBLEPATENT
Jul 09, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758517
METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF DAMAGED BILIARY DUCT
4y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12746227
BENZIMIDAZOLE COMPOUND FOR THE TREATMENT OF METABOLIC DISORDERS
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746296
IODINE LABELED HYDROGELS AND PRECURSORS THEREOF WITH IMPROVED RADIOPACITY
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740933
WATER-IN-OIL EMULSION COSMETIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740923
PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1352 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month