Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/674,298

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURING THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS WITH ARRAY OF LASER DIODES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 24, 2024
Priority
Jun 09, 2023 — provisional 63/472,049
Examiner
TSUI, YUNG-SHENG M
Art Unit
1684
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
General Electric Company
OA Round
3 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
367 granted / 552 resolved
+6.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 552 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims Claims 1-5 and 9-19 are pending and the subject of this FINAL Office Action. Claim Notes Applicants amend claim 1 to recite that the controller sends control signals to both the laser diodes and the “optical element.” This only requires a simple control signal to an optical element as a whole, not each optical element. However, controlling the laser diodes and a generic “optical element” is not allowable as it is anticipated, and clearly obvious, as explained below. Use of “such that” to describe physical components of the claimed system render the language after “such that” mere intended use. Applicants are strongly encouraged to utilize conventional, well-understood language like “configured to”; or better yet, the actual physical structure and/or computer programming. Individually-controlled diodes are incredibly familiar in the 3D printing art. And multi-plane diode arrangements as in Figure 3C are also well-known. The prior art applied below is this latter type. However, there are innumerable examples of the former type provided in the “Prior Art” section below. New Grounds of Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (A) A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (1)the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention; or (2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 9-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by HERZOG (US20180326655). As to claim 1, HERZOG teaches system for additively manufacturing a three-dimensional object, the system comprising: a build platform (Fig. 2); an array of laser diodes 10, each laser diode 10 of the array of laser diodes configured to direct a laser beam toward the build platform (Fig. 2); and a controller 11 communicatively coupled to each laser diode of the array of laser diodes such that control signals are communicated from the controller to each laser diode individually (Figs. 1-2; paras. 0051-52, 0062 & 0106-07). The individual beams from individually driven laser diodes can be in the same area or spot, or different, and beams moved as in Figure 3 (Figs. 1-4; paras. 0016, 0019, 0051-52, 0062, 0073 & 0106-07, claims 7-8). As to claim 1, HERZOG teaches system of claim 6, further comprising an optical element 27/29 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the controller selectively manipulates the laser beam of each laser diode by utilizing the optical element (Fig. 12; paras. 0012-0038, 0099). As to claim 1, HERZOG teaches system of claim 6, further comprising an optical element 29 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the optical element includes a plurality of optical elements, each of the plurality of optical elements is configured to manipulate the respective laser beam (id.) The controller is communicatively coupled to each laser diode of the array of laser diodes, and the optical element, the controller configured to communicate control signals to both (paras. 0034-35, 0037, 0044, 0099-102). Specifically, HERZOG explains that the optical elements 27/29 are mounted in a mounting device 12 which is controlled based on the desired laser output (paras. 0034-35, 0037, 0044, 0099-102). As to claim 2, HERZOG teaches system of claim 1, wherein the array of laser diodes is arranged such that the laser diodes of the array are in a plurality of rows in a first direction and in a plurality of columns in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction, each laser diode spaced from each neighboring laser diode (Figs. 2, 8-11). As to claim 3, HERZOG teaches system of claim 2, wherein neighboring rows of the plurality of rows are staggered in the first direction (id.) As to claim 4, HERZOG teaches system of claim 2, wherein neighboring columns of the plurality of columns are staggered in the second direction (id.) As to claim 5, HERZOG teaches system of claim 2, wherein the array of laser diodes is arranged in a plurality of layers in a third direction perpendicular to both of the first and second directions (id.) As to claim 9, HERZOG teaches system of claim 1, wherein the array of laser diodes is movable in a first direction or a second direction perpendicular to the first direction (Figs. 1-2 & 8-11). As to claim 10, HERZOG teaches system of claim 1, wherein each laser diode of the array of laser diodes is movable in a first direction or a second direction perpendicular to the first direction (id.) As to claim 11, HERZOG teaches system of claim 1, wherein the array of laser diodes is distributed in an area larger than a build surface of the build platform (id.) As to claim 12, HERZOG teaches system of claim 1, wherein the laser diodes are arranged in a layered two dimensional pattern (id.) As to claim 13, HERZOG teaches system of claim 12, wherein the laser diodes are arranged in a plurality of layers in a three dimensional pattern (id.) As to claim 14, HERZOG teaches system of claim 12, wherein the controller selectively manipulates the laser beam of each laser diode (Figs. 1-2; paras. 0051-52, 0062 & 0106-07). As to claim 15, HERZOG teaches system of claim 14, further comprising an optical element 27 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the controller selectively manipulates the laser beam of each laser diode by utilizing the optical element (Fig. 12; paras. 0012-0038, 0099). As to claim 16, HERZOG teaches system of claim 14, further comprising an optical element 27 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the optical element includes a plurality of optical elements, each of the plurality of optical elements is configured to manipulate the respective laser beam (id.) As to claim 17, HERZOG teaches system of claim 12, wherein the array of laser diodes includes another layer of a plurality of laser diodes arranged in a two-dimensional pattern (Fig. 2). As to claim 18, HERZOG teaches method for additively manufacturing a three-dimensional object, the method comprising: communicating control signals to each laser diode of an array of laser diodes individually (Figs. 1-2; paras. 0051-52, 0062 & 0106-07); and directing a laser beam of each laser diode of the array of laser diodes toward a build platform based on the control signals (Figs. 1-2). The individual beams from individually driven laser diodes can be in the same area or spot, or different, and beams moved as in Figure 3 (Figs. 1-4; paras. 0016, 0019, 0051-52, 0062, 0073 & 0106-07, claims 7-8). As to claim 19, HERZOG teaches method of claim 18, further comprising: moving the array of laser diodes or each laser diode in a first direction and a second direction perpendicular to the first direction based on the control signals (Figs. 1-2 & 8-11). Claims 1-5 and 9-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by MATTES (US20160279707). As to claim 1, MATTES teaches system for additively manufacturing a three-dimensional object, the system comprising: a build platform (Figs. 1-17); an array 110/700 of laser diodes 115/116/117, each laser diode of the array of laser diodes configured to direct a laser beam toward the build platform (Figs. 1-17); and a controller 800 communicatively coupled to each laser diode of the array of laser diodes such that control signals are communicated from the controller to each laser diode individually (claim 19; para. 0035, 0037, 0116-17). Each laser beam can by controlled to solidify a material layer by layer at locations corresponding to the cross section of an article to be formed in each layer using the laser modules (claim 27). In addition, the laser beam angles can be adjusted individually, causing different beam locations (paras. 0019, 0083, 0086, 0110-11, Figs. 2-3 & 8). In addition, the laser beams can be adjusted to yield different pixel sizes d (Fig. 1, paras. 0083); or pixel locations (Figs. 16-17). As to claim 1, MATTES teaches system of claim 6, further comprising an optical element 175 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the controller selectively manipulates the laser beam of each laser diode by utilizing the optical element (e.g. Fig. 3, claims 1-6, paras. 0005, 0008-14 & 0021). As to claim 1, MATTES teaches system of claim 6, further comprising an optical element 175 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the optical element includes a plurality of optical elements, each of the plurality of optical elements is configured to manipulate the respective laser beam (id.) The controller is communicatively coupled to each laser diode of the array of laser diodes, and the optical element, the controller configured to communicate control signals to both (paras. 0103- “The 3D-laser printing system further includes a control system 800 for controlling various functions of the 3D-printing system”). As to claim 2, MATTES teaches system of claim 1, wherein the array of laser diodes is arranged such that the laser diodes of the array are in a plurality of rows in a first direction and in a plurality of columns in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction, each laser diode spaced from each neighboring laser diode (Figs. 4-6, 10, 13-17). As to claim 3, MATTES teaches system of claim 2, wherein neighboring rows of the plurality of rows are staggered in the first direction (id.) As to claim 4, MATTES teaches system of claim 2, wherein neighboring columns of the plurality of columns are staggered in the second direction (id.) As to claim 5, MATTES teaches system of claim 2, wherein the array of laser diodes is arranged in a plurality of layers in a third direction perpendicular to both of the first and second directions (para. 0011 (“Furthermore, the printing system may comprise laser modules with different working planes. The latter may be done by placing laser modules at different heights relative to a reference surface and/or by providing different optical elements. Different working planes may be advantageous for three dimensional printing”)) As to claim 9, MATTES teaches system of claim 1, wherein the array of laser diodes is movable in a first direction or a second direction perpendicular to the first direction (Figs. 1-2 & 8-11). As to claim 10, MATTES teaches system of claim 1, wherein each laser diode of the array of laser diodes is movable in a first direction or a second direction perpendicular to the first direction (Figs. 4-6, 10, 13-17) As to claim 11, MATTES teaches system of claim 1, wherein the array of laser diodes is distributed in an area larger than a build surface of the build platform (id.) As to claim 12, MATTES teaches system of claim 1, wherein the laser diodes are arranged in a layered two dimensional pattern (id.) As to claim 13, MATTES teaches system of claim 12, wherein the laser diodes are arranged in a plurality of layers in a three dimensional pattern (para. 0011 (“Furthermore, the printing system may comprise laser modules with different working planes. The latter may be done by placing laser modules at different heights relative to a reference surface and/or by providing different optical elements. Different working planes may be advantageous for three dimensional printing”)) As to claim 14, MATTES teaches system of claim 12, wherein the controller selectively manipulates the laser beam of each laser diode (claim 19; para. 0035, 0037, 0116-17). As to claim 15, HERZOG teaches system of claim 14, further comprising an optical element 175 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes (Fig. 3, claims 1-6, paras. 0005, 0008-14 & 0021), wherein the controller selectively manipulates the laser beam of each laser diode by utilizing the optical element (claim 19; para. 0035, 0037, 0116-17). As to claim 16, MATTES teaches system of claim 14, further comprising an optical element 175 disposed between the build platform and the array of laser diodes, wherein the optical element includes a plurality of optical elements (Fig. 3, claims 1-6, paras. 0005, 0008-14 & 0021), each of the plurality of optical elements is configured to manipulate the respective laser beam (claim 19; para. 0035, 0037, 0116-17). As to claim 17, MATTES teaches system of claim 12, wherein the array of laser diodes includes another layer of a plurality of laser diodes arranged in a two-dimensional pattern (Figs. 4-6, 10, 13-17). As to claim 18, MATTES teaches method for additively manufacturing a three-dimensional object, the method comprising: communicating control signals to each laser diode of an array of laser diodes individually (claim 19; para. 0035, 0037, 0116-17); and directing a laser beam of each laser diode of the array of laser diodes toward a build platform based on the control signals (Figs. 4-6, 10, 13-17). As to claim 19, MATTES teaches method of claim 18, further comprising: moving the array of laser diodes or each laser diode in a first direction and a second direction perpendicular to the first direction based on the control signals (Figs. 4-6, 10, 13-17). As to claim 20, MATTES teaches method of claim 18, further comprising: selectively manipulating the laser beam of each laser diode based on the control signals (claim 19; para. 0035, 0037, 0116-17). Prior Art There are numerable prior art arrays with individually controlled diodes and optical elements, among them: US20220241867 (para. 0094); WO 2019186070 (movable optical diffuser); US 20180314044 (radiation source 21 such as laser diode array and exposure optics 20, both controlled by controller 29; Figs. 1 & 3, para. 0041). There are numerable prior art arrays with individually controlled diodes, among them: US 20210146624; US20180111317; US 20190351615; US 20210023777; US 20180126650; US 20180193955 (array optics 40); US 20180215092; US 20180304539; US 20200346403; US 20180281278; US 20180169970; US 20200086388; US 20210129430; US 12202197. Conclusion No claims are allowed. All claims are identical to or patentably indistinct from, or have unity of invention with claims in the application prior to the entry of the submission under 37 CFR 1.114 (that is, restriction (including a lack of unity of invention) would not be proper) and all claims could have been finally rejected on the grounds and art of record in the next Office action if they had been entered in the application prior to entry under 37 CFR 1.114. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL even though it is a first action after the filing of a request for continued examination and the submission under 37 CFR 1.114. See MPEP § 706.07(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELODY TSUI whose telephone number is (571)272-1846. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heather Calamita can be reached at 571-272-2876. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YUNG-SHENG M TSUI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1684
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766791
RADIAL PUMP ASSEMBLY AND METHODS OF USING SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766788
3D PRINTING AUTOMATION ASSISTED BY INTEGRATED ROBOTIC SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759052
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759229
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752463
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 10m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 552 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month