Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/675,962

SENSING ASSEMBLY FOR AN APPLIANCE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 28, 2024
Examiner
TATE-SIMS, CRISTI J
Art Unit
1711
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Haier Us Appliance Solutions, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
586 granted / 706 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
730
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 706 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I claims 1-14 in the reply filed on December 22, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 14-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wegener (WO 2021/175651 A1 machine translation). Regarding claim 1, Wegener figures 1-3 teach a dishwasher appliance comprising: a tub (3 appliance chamber) defined by a top wall, a sidewall coupled with the top wall, and a bottom wall coupled with the sidewall; a door (5) rotatably coupled with at least one of the sidewall and the bottom wall, the door comprising a contact flange (6 lever); and an actuating member (assembly of 15 pulley and 14 cable) coupled with the sidewall, the actuating member movable between a retracted position (when the door is closed) and an extended position (when the door is opened), wherein the actuating member in the extended position engages the contact flange.[Abstract][page 8] Regarding claim 2, figure 22 teaches a collar bracket (18 motor plate) coupled with the sidewall, wherein the collar bracket extends outwardly from the tub, and wherein the collar bracket has a U-shaped cross-section (assembly of two mandrels 44 and motor plate 18 shown in figure 22).[page 11] Regarding claim 3, figures 21 and 22 teach a first recess (13 cable drum) and a second recess (36 claw coupling) are defined by the collar bracket (18 motor plate), and wherein the actuating member (14 cable) extends through the first recess and the second recess. Regarding claim 4, figure 1 teaches the sidewall of the tub defines a height measured in the vertical direction, and wherein the actuating member (14 cable) is coupled to the sidewall within a lower half of the height of the tub along the vertical direction. Regarding claim 5, figure 1 teaches the actuating member (14 cable) is coupled to the sidewall within between 20% and 50% of the height along the vertical direction. Regarding claim 6, figure 1 teaches the actuating member (14 cable) is coupled to the sidewall within between 30% and 40% of the height along the vertical direction. Regarding claim 7, figure 1 teaches the actuating member (14 cable) is coupled to the sidewall at about 33% of the height along the vertical direction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 8-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wegener (WO 2021/175651 A1 machine translation), as applied to claim 1, and in further view of Kopera (US 2021/0274993). Regarding claim 8, Wegener is silent to a sensing assembly for detecting proximity between distal end of actuating member and the contact flange. Kopera is directed towards a dishwashing appliance having a position sensor mounted to the door or on the tub to engage a portion of the door (e.g., a latch) in contact with or received within the tub. Additionally or alternatively, feedback may be received (e.g., as a position signal) from a lock motor actuating the door. Upon reaching the open-vent position, a door closure assembly (e.g., lock motor) may hold or maintain the door in the open-vent position for a set period (e.g., predetermined period of time, a period continuing until completion of a dry cycle, etc. [0048] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to provide a position sensor mounted to the door as taught in Kopera to provide drying efficacy of the appliance by providing an open-vent position.[0004-008][0038] Regarding claim 9, Kopera figures 5A-5C teach closure assembly 118 includes a first contact 176A mounted to tub 104 and a second contact 176B mounted to door 116 (e.g., to rotate therewith). For instance, the first contact 176A may provide a rail or catch that receives or contacts the second contact 176B (e.g., latch 174) when door 116 is in the closed position or open-vent position thereby reading on a sensor coupled to one of the contact flange of the door and the actuating member; and an activator coupled to one of the contact flange of the door and the actuating member opposite the sensor, wherein the sensor is tripped in response to the activator and the sensor being out of proximity.[0040] Regarding claim 10, Kopera teaches door closure assembly 118 includes a lock actuator or motor 172 to selectively move or motivate door 116, such as between a closed position (e.g., FIG. 2) and an oven-vent position (e.g., FIG. 4). Kopera teaches in figures 2 and 7 a controller (160) communicatively coupled with the actuator assembly(172 motor). Kopera teaches method 700 may be used to operate any suitable dishwashing appliance, such as during a dry cycle in which a rinse or wash cycle has already been completed (e.g., such that articles within wash chamber 106 have been sprayed with water or wash fluid) thereby reading on the controller configured to: a controller configured to: receive a request to extend the actuating member; extend the actuating member; receive a signal that the sensor is tripped; and retract the actuating member in response to receiving the signal from the sensor.[0037][0045][0053-57] Regarding claim 11, Wegener figures 1 and 21-22 teach a housing (12) coupled with the sidewall, wherein the actuating member (14 cable) is disposed within the housing; and a driving member (11 motor unit) communicatively coupled with the controller, the driving member configured to drive and retract the actuating member.[page 8] Regarding claim 12, Wegener suggests the driving member (11 motor unit) comprises at least one of: an electric motor; a hydraulic motor; or a solenoid. Regarding claim 13, Kopera teaches the position sensor may include a limit switch (e.g., mechanical or magnetic switch in selective engagement with the door 116 at a set position or threshold), a rotary encoder (e.g., optical sensor, a Hall effect sensor, etc.), a load cell, or a strain gauge thereby suggesting the activator comprises a magnet to be an obvious modification.[0042] Regarding claim 14, Kopera teaches the position sensor may include a rotary encoder (e.g., optical sensor, a Hall effect sensor, etc.) thereby suggesting the sensor comprises at least one of: a reed switch; or a Hall effect sensor to be an obvious modification.[0041] Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CRISTI J TATE-SIMS whose telephone number is (571)272-1722. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at 571-272-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CRISTI J. TATE-SIMS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1711 /CRISTI J TATE-SIMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595610
SYSTEM FOR DETECTING THE POSITION OF A WASHING MACHINE SUBWASHER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595614
CLOTHES TREATMENT APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595619
LAUNDRY TREATING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593649
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589552
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED POST PROCESSING OF 3D PRINTED OBJECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 706 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month