Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/676,472

SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 28, 2024
Priority
Apr 10, 2024 — TW 113113249
Examiner
SEDOROOK, DAVID PAUL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
140 granted / 153 resolved
+31.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.3%
+26.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 153 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Applicant’s election of Claims 1-7, without traverse, has been acknowledged. Claims 1-10 remain pending. Claims 8-10 are withdrawn from consideration. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Semiconductor Structure with Field Plate and Multiple Dielectric Layers and Method of Forming the Same. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhao et al (US 2022/0376061). Regarding Claim 1, Zhao et al discloses a semiconductor structure (semiconductor device 100A [0018] Fig 1C and Fig 2), comprising: a substrate (substrate 102 [0019] Fig 1C); a semiconductor layer (nitride-based semiconductor layer 104 and 106 [0019] Fig 1C and Fig 2) on the substrate (102 Fig 1C and Fig 2); a gate structure (gate structure 110 [0024] Fig 1C and Fig 2) on the semiconductor layer (104 and 106 Fig 1C and Fig 2); a first dielectric layer (passivation layer 116 [0019] Fig 1C and Fig 2) continuously extending on the gate structure (110 Fig 1C and Fig 2) and the semiconductor layer (104 and 106 Fig 1C and Fig 2), wherein the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2) comprises a first portion (shown in annotated Fig 2), a second portion (shown in annotated Fig 2), a third portion (shown in annotated Fig 2), and a fourth portion (shown in annotated Fig 2), and the third portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the fourth portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) are on an upper surface of the gate structure (110 Fig 1C and Fig 2); an etch stop layer (field plate 122 [0018] is capable of functioning as an etch stop layer Fig 1C and Fig 2) on at least the first portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the fourth portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2); a second dielectric layer (passivation layer 118 [0030] Fig 1C and Fig 2) on the etch stop layer (122 Fig 1C and Fig 2); and a field plate (field plate 124 [0018] Fig 1C and Fig 2) comprising a first field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) on the second dielectric layer (118 Fig 1C and Fig 2), a second field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and a third field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) respectively on the second portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the third portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2), and a fourth field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) on the second dielectric layer (118 Fig 1C and Fig 2), wherein a first distance (shown in annotated Fig 2) between a lower surface of the first field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the semiconductor layer (104 and 106 Fig 1C and Fig 2) is larger than a second distance (shown in annotated Fig 2) between a lower surface of the second field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the semiconductor layer (104 and 106 Fig 1C and Fig 2), and a third distance (shown in annotated Fig 2) between a lower surface of the third field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the semiconductor layer (104 and 106 Fig 1C and Fig 2) is smaller than a fourth distance (shown in annotated Fig 2) between a lower surface of the fourth field plate portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the semiconductor layer (104 and 106 Fig 1C and Fig 2). PNG media_image1.png 562 958 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 748 1254 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Zhao et al discloses the limitations of claim 1 as explained above. Zhao et al further discloses wherein the field plate (field plate 124 [0018] Fig 1C and Fig 2) extends continuously on the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2) and the second dielectric layer (118 Fig 1C and Fig 2). Regarding Claim 3, Zhao et al discloses the limitations of claim 1 as explained above. Zhao et al further discloses wherein a projection of the second dielectric layer (118 Fig 1C and Fig 2) on the substrate (102 Fig 1C) along a vertical direction of the substrate (102 Fig 1C) overlaps with a projection of the first portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the fourth portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig2) on the substrate (102 Fig 1C) along the vertical direction of the substrate (102 Fig 1C), and the projection of the second dielectric layer (118 Fig 1C and Fig 2) on the substrate (102 Fig 1C) along the vertical direction of the substrate (102 Fig 1C) does not overlap with a projection of the second portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) and the third portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) of the first dielectric layer (shown in annotated Fig 2) on the substrate (102 Fig 1C) along the vertical direction of the substrate (102 Fig 1C). PNG media_image3.png 898 1222 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 4, Zhao et al discloses the limitations of claim 1 as explained above. Zhao et al further discloses wherein the first field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2) and the second field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2) are beside a same side of the gate structure (110 Fig 1C and Fig 2), and the second field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2) is closer to the gate structure (110 Fig 1C and Fig 2) than the first field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2). Regarding Claim 5, Zhao et al discloses the limitations of claim 4 as explained above. Zhao et al further discloses wherein the third field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2) is closer to the first field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2) and the second field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2) than the fourth field plate portion (shown above in annotated Fig 2). Regarding Claim 6, Zhao et al discloses the limitations of claim 1 as explained above. Zhao et al further discloses further comprising a third dielectric layer (passivation layer 120 [0019] Fig 1C and Fig 2) on the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2) and the second dielectric layer (118 Fig 1C), wherein the field plate (124 Fig 1C and Fig 2) is on the third dielectric layer (120 Fig 1C and Fig 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 7: Regarding Claim 7, Zhao et al discloses the limitations of claim 1 as explained above. Zhao et al (US 2022/0376061) further discloses an upper surface of the third portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2) is lower (shown in annotated Fig 2) than an upper surface of the fourth portion (shown in annotated Fig 2) of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2). PNG media_image4.png 777 1000 media_image4.png Greyscale The reason for the indication of allowability of Claim 7 is the inclusion of wherein an upper surface of the second portion of the first dielectric layer is lower than an upper surface of the first portion of the first dielectric layer. Specifically, it can be observed in annotated Fig 2 of Zhao et al that the upper surface of the second portion of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig 2) is at the same height as the upper surface of the first portion of the first dielectric layer (116 Fig 1C and Fig2), and there does not appear to be a reasonable interpretation to suggest otherwise. Further, should another reference be found that discloses this limitation, it would not be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine the references and make this alteration to Zhao et al. It is these features found in the claim, as they are claimed in the combination that has not been found, taught or suggested by the prior art of record, which makes this claim allowable over the prior art. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Related Cited Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hutzler et al (US 2017/0330941) which discloses a semiconductor device with a structured etch stop layer [0005], and Bothe et al (US 2020/0395474) which discloses a HEMT device with a field plate on the second insulating layer [0019]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID PAUL SEDOROOK whose telephone number is (571)272-4158. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William B Partridge can be reached on (571) 270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.P.S./Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /William B Partridge/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733238
OHMIC ELECTRODE FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL CARRIER GAS (2DCG) SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727221
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727241
STACKED MULTI-GATE DEVICE WITH DIFFUSION STOPPING LAYER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720830
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SILICON CARBIDE SUBSTRATE, SILICON CARBIDE SINGLE-CRYSTAL SUBSTRATE AND SILICON CARBIDE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12696537
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.5%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month