Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/676,942

COMMUNICATION SETTING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 29, 2024
Examiner
KIM, KI SEOK
Art Unit
2418
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-58.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
8
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
70.4%
+30.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is a response to an application filed on May 29,2024. Claims 1-5 are pending and ready for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on May 29, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. §102 and §103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §102 and §103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. §102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1) as being anticipated by He et al. (US Patent Publication No. 2017/0078300A1). Regarding claim 1, He et al. discloses a communication setting method (See, Abstract, Figs. 8 and 10) of enabling a first communication device (See, e.g., Fig. 4, #102B(4), a ‘keyboard’) and a second communication device (See, Fig. 4, #102A(1), a ‘Tablet’) that are shipped together as a set (See, ¶[0036], “peripheral devices and the host device could be sold together as a set that can be packaged together.”) and are compliant with common wireless communication to be connected to each other by wireless communication See, e.g., ¶[0008], “Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)”), the communication setting method comprising: a step in which a storage controller in the first communication device (See, Fig. 3, #324 and ¶s[0014]-[0018]) causes a storage in the first communication device (Figs. 1 and 8, #322(1), “NV MEM”) to store, at a predetermined stage before the shipping (See, e.g., ¶[0051] describing the storage of the “BLE OOB keys 805 being stored prior to the end user unpacking the devices), communication connection information (See, Fig. 8, #806, and ¶[0048], the “BLE OOB key 805”) that is issued for the first communication device (Fig. 8, #802 and ¶[0048]) and includes predetermined identification information used for the connection (See, ¶[0048], the “BLE OOB key 805 can be “an example type of the passcode and/or device ID”); and a step in which a storage controller in the second communication device (Fig. 7, #324 and ¶s [0015] and [0043]) causes a storage in the second communication device (Fig. 7, # 322(1), “NV MEM”) to store, at a predetermined stage before the shipping (See, e.g., ¶[0051] as discussed above), a same communication connection information as stored in the storage in the first communication device (See, Fig. 8, #814 and ¶[0049]. Regarding claim 2, He et al. further discloses the recited step in which a communication connection information issuance in the first communication device generates the communication connection information (See, Fig. 8, #802 and ¶[0048]. Regarding claim 3, He et al. further discloses the storage in the first communication device being a non-volatile memory (See, Fig. 3, #322(1), Fig. 8, #806 and ¶[[0048]). Regarding claim 4, He et al. further discloses the recited step in which, after the shipping, a communicator in the first communication device executes advertising for pairing with the second communication device within an allowable range of a number of startups (See, ¶s[0028] and [0039], the peripheral device 102(B) enters the advertising mode upon removal from the packaging or upon power up). Regarding claim 5, He et al. further discloses that the second communication device is an information processing device (See, e.g., , Figs. 3-7, #102A(1) and ¶s[0014] and [0034]) and the first communication device is a peripheral device of the information processing device (See, e.g., Figs. 3-7, #102B(4), ‘keyboard’ and ¶s[0014] and [0036]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KI S KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-9141. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:00AM - 5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Moo R Jeong can be reached at (571) 272-9617. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.S.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2418 February 17, 2026 /Moo Jeong/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2418
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 27, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month