Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/677,105

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 29, 2024
Priority
Aug 18, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0108137 +2 more
Examiner
OWENS, DANELL L
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
578 granted / 759 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-7, 9-17, 19 and 20 are amended. Claims 1-20 pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 7-9, 11, 12 and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Uluag et al. (US PG Pub. 20220053175). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Uluag discloses an electronic apparatus (illustrated in fig. 1) comprising: an image projection unit (image projectors 20, 25 of fig. 1); a memory configured to store at least one instruction (para. 0059; computer software stored in (non-transitory) memory and executable by the processor, or by hardware, or by a combination of tangibly stored software and hardware (and tangibly stored firmware)); and one or more processors (para. 0059) configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: based on an image capturing (sensor 40 of fig. 1) a projection surface (surface 5 of fig. 1), identify feature information of the projection surface (para. 0033; camera 40 may be analyzed to determine the location of any pans 10, 15 or other objects upon the surface 5), identify a plurality of areas divided on the projection surface, based on the feature information of the projection surface (para. 0033; location of an available regions 30, 35 may be determined for displaying projected images), identify a plurality of first format information corresponding to a plurality of images (para. 0033; available region may be a region 30, 35 that avoids the pans 10, 15 or other objects), respectively, (para. 0035; image projectors 20, 25 may be configured to project images of a variable size onto different regions 30, 35 of the surface 5 or of one or more objects placed upon the surface 5. The image projectors 20, 25 may also be configured to project images of a variable shape onto different regions 30, 35 of the surface 5 or of one or more objects placed upon the surface 5), obtain a plurality of layout information corresponding to a plurality of screens that correspond to the plurality of images, based on the feature information of the projection surface and the plurality of first format information (para. 0033; With this information, the size and location of an available region 30, 35 may be determined for displaying projected images. The available region may be a region 30, 35 that avoids the pans 10, 15 or other objects), respectively, and control (para. 0033; Image data output by the camera 40 may be communicated to a controller (not shown) for analysis) the image projection unit so that the plurality of images are projected based on the plurality of layout information to the plurality of areas divided on the projection surface, respectively, in a multi-view (para. 0035; image projectors 20, 25 may be configured to project images of a variable size onto different regions 30, 35 of the surface 5 or of one or more objects placed upon the surface 5. The image projectors 20, 25 may also be configured to project images of a variable shape onto different regions 30, 35 of the surface 5 or of one or more objects placed upon the surface 5). Regarding claims 2 and 12, Uluag discloses wherein the feature information (what’s on the projection surface) of the projection surface includes at least one of shape information (para. 0033; The size and configuration of each region 30, 35 is determined, at least in part, according to the location of pans 10, 15 or other objects upon the surface 5. At least one sensor 40 is provided for sensing the surface 5), structure information, size information, color information, reflectivity information, or obstacle information, each respective first format information of the plurality of first format information includes at least one of resolution information or aspect ratio information of the corresponding image (para. 0035; he image projectors 20, 25 may also be configured to project images of a variable shape onto different regions 30, 35 of the surface 5 or of one or more objects placed upon the surface 5. The size and/or shape of an image to be projected may be adjusted to correspond with the size and/or shape of an available region 30, 35 determined by an analysis of image data output by the camera 40), and each the respective layout information of the plurality of layout screens information includes at least one of resolution information, aspect ratio information, location information (para. 0035; image data output by the camera 40 may be analyzed regularly, with a predetermined frequency, to monitor movement of objects placed upon the surface 5 or to identify the location of objects newly placed upon the surface 5), or direction information of the corresponding screen. Regarding claims 7 and 17, Uluag discloses wherein the one or more processors (para. 0040) are configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: control the image projection unit to project user interface (UI) information indicating a placement state of the plurality of screens based on the plurality of layout information (para. 0033; With this information, the size and location of an available region 30, 35 may be determined for displaying projected images. The available region may be a region 30, 35 that avoids the pans 10, 15 or other objects), respectively, and based on the projected UI information being selected in response to a user command, provide the multi-view mode based on the plurality of layout information (para. 0040; control unit may also comprise an interface, such as a wireless communications module and various physical connectors, for receiving images to be projected by the projectors 20, 25 and any associated audio to be played through the loudspeakers). Regarding claims 8 and 18, Uluag discloses wherein the UI information includes a guide UI for adjusting at least one of size, direction, or angle of the plurality of screens (para. 0041-0044; an interface to supply the image data output by the camera 40 for analysis by an external controller. The external controller may be, for example, a controller application executing on a mobile or “smart” phone or general purpose computer operated by the user. The control unit may provide an interface to receive and to process configuration commands or configuration signals in a predetermined set of commands or signals arranged to define or change the configuration of an image projector 20, 25. A controller may thereby generate and transmit to the control unit an appropriate command or signal to select or configure one of the image projectors 20, 25, as described above. [0042] For example, the predetermined set of command may include commands to: [0043] select an image projector 20, 25 to display a defined image or video images; [0044] define the size of an image to be projected by a selected image projector 20, 25). Regarding claims 9 and 19, Uluag discloses wherein the one or more processors (para. 0040) are configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: based on a location of one of the plurality of images being selected in response to a user command (para. 0052; features as may be controlled by the sending of commands to the control unit via the provided interface), identify first format information (what’s on the projection surface) of the plurality of first format information corresponding to remaining images from among the plurality of images (para. 0033; The size and configuration of each region 30, 35 is determined, at least in part, according to the location of pans 10, 15 or other objects upon the surface 5), respectively, obtain layout information of the plurality of layout information of a screen a plurality of screens corresponding to the remaining images based on the feature information of the projection surface and the plurality of first format information (para. 0033; this information, the size and location of an available region 30, 35 may be determined for displaying projected images. The available region may be a region 30, 35 that avoids the pans 10, 15 or other objects), and control the image projection unit to provide the remaining images based on the obtained layout information (para. 0035). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3, 10, 13 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uluag et al. (US PG Pub. 20220053175) in view of Yoo et al. (US PG Pub. 20220132081). Regarding claims 3 and 13, Uluag discloses wherein the one or more processors (para. 0040) are configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: identify a plurality of loss information (shape and location) based on the plurality of first format information (para. 0033; size and configuration of each region 30 and 35 is determined at least in part according to the location of pans 10 and 15 or other objects upon the surface 5) and the plurality of second format information (aspect ratio or location of images) (para. 0035; The size and/or shape of an image to be projected may be adjusted to correspond with the size and/or shape of an available region 30, 35 determined by an analysis of image data output by the camera 40), respectively, and obtain the plurality of layout information of the plurality of screens based on the plurality of loss information, respectively (para. 0035; the image data output by the camera 40 may be analyzed regularly, with a predetermined frequency, to monitor movement of objects placed upon the surface 5 or to identify the location of objects newly placed upon the surface 5. The image projectors 20, 25 may be reconfigured to adjust the size and/or the shape of the projected images according to the determined size and/or shape of the available regions 30, 35, should any object be moved on the surface 5. That is, an available region 30, 35 may increase or decrease in size or may change in shape according to the changing positions of objects on the surface 5, or according to the addition, replacement or removal of objects such as pans 10, 15). Uluag fails to teach wherein the one or more processors are configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: perform a keystone correction for the projection surface based on the feature information of the projection surface. Yoo discloses wherein the one or more processors are configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: perform a keystone correction for the projection surface based on the feature information of the projection surface (para. 0111; Depending on the characteristic of the area 910 onto which the screen is to be output, there may be a problem in that a user 930 viewing the screen views a distorted screen. For example, depending on the different relative distance between the area 910 to output the screen and the user 930 (in FIG. 9, as the screen is closer to a center part of the area 910 to output the screen, the distance between the user 930 and the area 910 to output the screen may be increased). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify projection device of Uluag with the keystone correction system of Yoo in order to project images that are easy for the user to see. Regarding claims 10 and 20, Uluag discloses wherein the one or more processors (para. 0040) are configured to, by executing the at least one instruction: identify a plurality of loss information (shape and location) based on the plurality of first format information (para. 0033; size and configuration of each region 30 and 35 is determined at least in part according to the location of pans 10 and 15 or other objects upon the surface 5) and the plurality of second format information (aspect ratio or location of images) (para. 0035; The size and/or shape of an image to be projected may be adjusted to correspond with the size and/or shape of an available region 30, 35 determined by an analysis of image data output by the camera 40), respectively, and obtain the plurality of layout information of the plurality of screens based on the plurality of loss information, respectively (para. 0035; the image data output by the camera 40 may be analyzed regularly, with a predetermined frequency, to monitor movement of objects placed upon the surface 5 or to identify the location of objects newly placed upon the surface 5. The image projectors 20, 25 may be reconfigured to adjust the size and/or the shape of the projected images according to the determined size and/or shape of the available regions 30, 35, should any object be moved on the surface 5. That is, an available region 30, 35 may increase or decrease in size or may change in shape according to the changing positions of objects on the surface 5, or according to the addition, replacement or removal of objects such as pans 10, 15). Uluag fails to teach identifying a number of planes included in the image capturing the projection surface, identify area, direction and proportion of a projection image valid for each of the identified planes, provide a guide UI based on the identified area, direction and proportion of the valid projection image for each of the identified planes, and obtain the plurality of layout information based on a projection surface layout selected through the guide UI. Yoo discloses identifying a number of planes included in the image capturing the projection surface (illustrated in fig. 6B), identify area, direction and proportion of a projection image valid for each of the identified planes (para. 0095; processor 430 may identify the flatness of a specific area based on the spatial information, and may determine the areas 610, 620, and 630 having the flatness that is equal to or larger than a predetermined value as the areas to display the screen to be output by the projector module 420), provide a guide UI (para. 0101; projector module 420 through selection of the areas 610, 620, and 630) based on the identified area, direction and proportion of the valid projection image for each of the identified planes, and obtain the plurality of layout information based on a projection surface layout selected through the guide UI (illustrated in fig. 7B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the filing date of the application to modify the projection device of Uluag with the system of Yoo that identifies a number of planes in order to project an image to an area that is free from obstruction. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 and 14-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The subject matter of claim 4 that was found to be allowable is wherein the plurality of second format information based on a similarity between the plurality of first format information and the plurality of second format information, respectively, and obtain the plurality of layout information based on second format information having a smallest loss information from among the plurality of second format information. The subject matter of claim 5 that was found to be allowable is identify the plurality of loss information corresponding to each of resolution information and aspect ratio information included in the plurality of second format information, respectively, based on a similarity between the plurality of first format information and the plurality of second format information, respectively, identify integrated loss information based on the plurality of loss information, and identify second format information having a smallest integrated loss information from among the plurality of second format information. The subject matter of claim 6 that was found to be allowable is wherein identify a plurality of integrated loss information corresponding to the plurality of second format information based on the plurality of first loss information and the plurality of second loss information, respectively, and identify second format information of the plurality of second format information having a smallest integrated loss information. The subject matter of claim 14 that was found to be allowable is wherein the plurality of second format information based on a similarity between the plurality of first format information and the plurality of second format information, respectively, and obtain the plurality of layout information based on second format information having a smallest loss information from among the plurality of second format information. The subject matter of claim 15 that was found to be allowable is identify the plurality of loss information corresponding to each of resolution information and aspect ratio information included in the plurality of second format information, respectively, based on a similarity between the plurality of first format information and the plurality of second format information, respectively, identify integrated loss information based on the plurality of loss information, and identify second format information having a smallest integrated loss information from among the plurality of second format information. The subject matter of claim 16 that was found to be allowable is wherein identify a plurality of integrated loss information corresponding to the plurality of second format information based on the plurality of first loss information and the plurality of second loss information, respectively, and identify second format information of the plurality of second format information having a smallest integrated loss information. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANELL L OWENS whose telephone number is (571)270-5365. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am-5:00pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANELL L OWENS/Examiner, Art Unit 2882 31 August 2026 /BAO-LUAN Q LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 24, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750467
FOCUS ADJUSTMENT METHOD
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743011
ILLUMINATION DEVICE AND PROJECTOR
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736861
WORK INFORMATION PROJECTION SYSTEM AND RELATIVE INFORMATION CALIBRATION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724337
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION DEVICE, LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE, AND PROJECTOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724334
PROJECTOR AND PROJECTION POSITIONING METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 7m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month