Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/677,834

DEVICE FOR MEASURING A POWER CURRENT DELIVERED BY A POWER FET

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 29, 2024
Examiner
POTHEN, FEBA
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
498 granted / 616 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
661
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/29/24 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5-12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ramachandran et al., US 11,243,235 Regarding claim 1, Ramachandran discloses a device for measuring a power current to be supplied by a main power field effect transistor (FET), the device comprising: a current measurement power FET comprising a first current path terminal couplable to a first current path terminal of the main power FET (Fig. 1; FET 104 and 106); and a first FET and a second FET, wherein a gate terminal of the first FET is electrically coupled to a gate terminal of the second FET (Fig. 1; FET 110, 112), wherein a first current path terminal of the first FET is coupled to a second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, or wherein a first current path terminal of the second FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the current measurement power FET (Fig. 1; FETs 110, 112, 104, 106 are all connected to each other and are therefore coupled; alternatively, FETs 202, 204 in Fig. 2 also can be considered to be a first and second FET as they are also connected to FETs 104, 106), a second current path terminal of the main power FET, a voltage source, or a load external to the device, and a second current path terminal of the first FET is electrically coupled to a second current path terminal of the second FET (Fig. 1; FETs 110, 112, 104, 106 and load 102 are all connected to each other and are therefore coupled to the multiple current paths). Regarding claim 5, Ramachandran discloses further comprising a comparator having a first input couplable to the second current path terminal of the main power FET, a second input of the comparator couplable to the second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, and an output of the comparator couplable to the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 6, Ramachandran discloses a third FET, wherein a gate terminal of the third FET is coupled to the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET, and wherein a first current path terminal of the third FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET or the second current path terminal of the main power FET (See Fig. 2). Regarding claim 7, Ramachandran discloses a fourth FET, wherein a first current path terminal of the fourth FET is coupled to the second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, and a second current path terminal of the fourth FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET; and a comparator having a first input coupled to the second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, a second input of the comparator couplable to the second current path terminal of the main power FET, and an output of the comparator coupled to a gate terminal of the fourth FET (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 8, Ramachandran discloses wherein the first FET and the second FET are arranged as a current mirror (Fig. 2; 202, 204). Regarding claim 9, Ramachandran teaches wherein the first FET and the second FET are P-type, wherein the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET are coupled to the second current path terminal of the first FET, and wherein the first current path terminal of the second FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET (Fig. 2; 202, 204 are p-type). Regarding claim 10, Ramachandran discloses wherein the first FET and the second FET are N-type, wherein the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET are coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET, and wherein the second current path terminal of the first FET and the second current path terminal of the second FET are electrically coupled (Fig. 1; Col. 3 lines 60-Col. 4 lines 15). Regarding claim 11, Ramachandran teaches a power control circuit for controlling an electrical load, the power control circuit comprising: a main power field effect transistor (FET) comprising a first current path terminal couplable to an electrical power source(Fig. 1; FET 104 to source 108); a second current path terminal of the main FET couplable to a terminal of the electrical load (Fig. 1; load 102); and a measurement circuit configured to measure a power current to be supplied by the main FET, the measurement circuit comprising: a current measurement power FET comprising a first current path terminal couplable to a first current path terminal of the main power FET (Fig. 1; FET 106); and a first FET and a second FET, wherein a gate terminal of the first FET is electrically coupled to a gate terminal of the second FET, wherein a first current path terminal of the first FET is coupled to a second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, or wherein a first current path terminal of the second FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the current measurement power FET(Fig. 1; FETs 110, 112, 104, 106 are all connected to each other and are therefore coupled; alternatively, FETs 202, 204 in Fig. 2 also can be considered to be a first and second FET as they are also connected to FETs 104, 106), a second current path terminal of the main power FET, a voltage source, or the electrical load, and a second current path terminal of the first FET electrically coupled to a second current path terminal of the second FET(Fig. 1; FETs 110, 112, 104, 106 and load 102 are all connected to each other and are therefore coupled to the multiple current paths). Regarding claim 12, Ramachandran teaches wherein the main power FET and the current measurement power FET are of a same conductivity type (Col. 3 lines 30-50). Regarding claim 14, Ramachandran teaches wherein the measurement circuit further comprises a comparator having a first input couplable to the second current path terminal of the main power FET, a second input of the comparator couplable to the second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, and an output of the comparator couplable to the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET (Fig. 1; comparator 114). Regarding claim 15, Ramachandran teaches a method to measure a power current to be supplied by a main power field effect transistor (FET) in a device, the method comprising: receiving a control signal at a gate terminal of a current measurement power FET ((Fig. 1; FET 106), the gate terminal of the current measurement power FET is coupled to a gate terminal of the main FET (Fig. 1; FET 104 and 106), and a first current path terminal of the current measurement power FET coupled to a first current path terminal of the main power FET (Fig. 1; FET 104 and 106, as shown are connected); and regulating, by a comparator, a first potential at a second terminal of the current measurement power FET to equal a second potential at a second terminal of the main FET (Fig. 1; amplifier 114; Col. 3 lines 60- Col. 4 lines 15 ), wherein a gate terminal of a first FET is electrically coupled to a gate terminal of a second FET, wherein a first current path terminal of the first FET is coupled to a second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, or wherein a first current path terminal of the second FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the current measurement power FET (Fig. 1; FETs 110, 112, 104, 106 are all connected to each other and are therefore coupled; alternatively, FETs 202, 204 in Fig. 2 also can be considered to be a first and second FET as they are also connected to FETs 104, 106), a second current path terminal of the main power FET, a voltage source, or an external electrical load, and a second current path terminal of the first FET electrically coupled to a second current path terminal of the second FET(Fig. 1; FETs 110, 112, 104, 106 and load 102 are all connected to each other and are therefore coupled to the multiple current paths). Regarding claim 17, Ramachandran teaches wherein the comparator includes a first input coupled to the second current path terminal of the main power FET, a second input of the comparator is coupled to the second current path terminal of the current measurement power FET, and an output of the comparator is coupled to the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET (Fig. 1; as shown, all elements are connected). Regarding claim 18, Ramachandran teaches wherein a gate terminal of a third FET is coupled to the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET, and wherein a first current path terminal of the third FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET or the second current path terminal of the main power FET (Fig. 2; Third FET being 202 or 204). Regarding claim 20, Ramachandran teaches wherein the first FET and the second FET are P-type, wherein the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET are coupled to the second current path terminal of the first FET, and wherein the first current path terminal of the second FET is coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET, or wherein the first FET and the second FET are N-type, wherein the gate terminal of the first FET and the gate terminal of the second FET are coupled to the first current path terminal of the first FET, and wherein the second current path terminal of the first FET and the second current path terminal of the second FET are electrically coupled (Fig. 1; Col. 3 lines 60-Col. 4 lines 15). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2, 4, 13, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ramachandran et al., US 11,243,235 in view of Tanaka, US 6339318 Regarding claim 2, Ramachandran is silent in wherein a semiconductor surface of the current measurement power FET and channel widths of the first FET and the second FET are such that a ratio between a charging current to be supplied at the second current path terminal of the main power FET and an output current to be supplied at the second current path terminal of the first FET differs from a ratio between a semiconductor surface of the main power FET and the semiconductor surface of the current measurement power FET. Tanaka teaches channel widths of a first FET and a second FET are such that a ratio between a charging current to be supplied at a current path terminal of a main power FET and an output current to be supplied at a second current path terminal of the first FET differs from a ratio between a semiconductor surface of the main power FET and the semiconductor surface of a current measurement power FET (Col. 4 lines 50-55; channel widths of the MOSFETs are differentiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Tanaka into Ramachandran for the benefit of providing a differential circuit design having offsets (Col. 4 lines 50-60). Regarding claim 4, Ramachandran is silent in wherein channel widths of the first FET and the second FET are different. Tanaka teaches wherein channel widths of a first and second FET are different (Col. 4 lines 50-55; channel widths of the MOSFETs are differentiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Tanaka into Ramachandran for the benefit of providing a differential circuit design having offsets (Col. 4 lines 50-60). Regarding claim 13, Ramachandran is silent in wherein a semiconductor surface of the current measurement power FET and channel widths of the first FET and the second FET are such that a ratio between a charging current to be supplied at the second current path terminal of the main power FET and an output current to be supplied at the second current path terminal of the first FET differs from a ratio between a semiconductor surface of the main power FET and the semiconductor surface of the current measurement power FET. Tanaka teaches channel widths of a first FET and a second FET are such that a ratio between a charging current to be supplied at a current path terminal of a main power FET and an output current to be supplied at a second current path terminal of the first FET differs from a ratio between a semiconductor surface of the main power FET and the semiconductor surface of a current measurement power FET (Col. 4 lines 50-55; channel widths of the MOSFETs are differentiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Tanaka into Ramachandran for the benefit of providing a differential circuit design having offsets (Col. 4 lines 50-60). Regarding claim 16, Ramachandran is silent in wherein a semiconductor surface of the current measurement power FET and channel widths of the first FET and the second FET are such that a ratio between a charging current to be supplied at the second current path terminal of the main power FET and an output current to be supplied at the second current path terminal of the first FET differs from a ratio between a semiconductor surface of the main power FET and the semiconductor surface of the current measurement power FET. Tanaka teaches channel widths of a first FET and a second FET are such that a ratio between a charging current to be supplied at a current path terminal of a main power FET and an output current to be supplied at a second current path terminal of the first FET differs from a ratio between a semiconductor surface of the main power FET and the semiconductor surface of a current measurement power FET (Col. 4 lines 50-55; channel widths of the MOSFETs are differentiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Tanaka into Ramachandran for the benefit of providing a differential circuit design having offsets (Col. 4 lines 50-60). Claim 3, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ramachandran et al., US 11,243,235 in view of Nomoto, US 6185488 Regarding claim 3, Ramachandran teaches wherein the first FET and second FET are of a MOSFET type. Ramachandran is silent in wherein the current measurement power FET is of a vertical double-diffused metal-oxide-semiconductor FET (VDMOSFET) type. Nomoto teaches wherein a power FET is of a vertical double-diffused metal-oxide-semiconductor FET (VDMOSFET) type (Col. 7 lines 8-12). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to substitute the VDMOS as taught by Nomoto into Ramachandran since the substitution would produce the predictable result of a switching device to connect or disconnect a power supply. Regarding claim 19, Ramachandran is silent in wherein the current measurement power FET is of a vertical double-diffused metal-oxide-semiconductor FET (VDMOSFET) type, and wherein the first FET and second FET are of a MOSFET type. Nomoto teaches wherein a power FET is of a vertical double-diffused metal-oxide-semiconductor FET (VDMOSFET) type (Col. 7 lines 8-12). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to substitute the VDMOS as taught by Nomoto into Ramachandran since the substitution would produce the predictable result of a switching device to connect or disconnect a power supply. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEBA POTHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9219. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached on 571.272.2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEBA POTHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601672
SENSITIVITY AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR MAGNETOCHEMICAL SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601700
REAL-TIME MONITORING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SURFACE SALT DEPOSITION AMOUNT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596087
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING CONDENSATION AND/OR ADVANCE OF CORROSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584900
METHOD, KIT, AND SENSOR FOR DETECTING ANTIBODY OF INTEREST IN WASTEWATER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571840
Array of Through-Silicon Via Contact Points on a Semiconductor Die
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month