Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/677,851

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 29, 2024
Priority
Jun 13, 2023 — JP 2023-096768
Examiner
DUMBRIS, SETH M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sodick Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
680 granted / 891 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
939
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.0%
+38.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 891 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 9-10 and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The terms “slow-cooling process” and “slowly cooled” in claims 9 and 16 are relative terms which renders the claims indefinite. The terms “slow” and “slowly” are not defined by the claims, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. It is unclear as to what is encompassed in “slow” or what rate(s) are in the scope of the claims or outside the scope of the claims. This may be overcome by using the temperature ranges set forth in Paragraph 49 of the originally filed specification. Claims 10 and 17-20 are included in this rejection as they depend upon a rejected claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 11-15 are allowed. Claims 9-10 and 16-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art to the instant claims is that of Araie et al. (US 2019/0061001). Araie teaches a method of forming a layered system by repeated melting and solidifying metal material (Paragraph 7) including martensitic steel (Paragraph 8) having a martensitic starting temperature and a thermal treatment at a first temperature T1 and a second temperature T2 (Paragraph 10). No general teaching of temperatures is provided and only a specific example using SUS 420 J2 is disclosed (Paragraph 120) where the manufacturing temperature is 70 °C and is cooled to 29 °C (Paragraph 121). These temperatures are significantly outside that which is claimed. Matsumoto (US 2020/0023436) teaches three-dimensional manufacturing of an article by irradiation (abstract) using SUS420J2 with a martensitic transformation start temperature of 100 °C (Paragraph 56). As such, the instant claims would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Other art to be made of record is that of Fujita et al. (US 2003/0096136), Mazumder et al. (US 6,925,346), and Yamamoto (US 2021/0213686) all teach additive manufacturing demonstrating the level of ordinary skill in the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SETH DUMBRIS whose telephone number is (571)272-5105. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:00 AM - 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SETH DUMBRIS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1784 /SETH DUMBRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683061
LAMINATED CORE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673482
LAYERED AND SCROLLED NANOCOMPOSITES WITH ALIGNED SEMI-INFINITE GRAPHENE INCLUSIONS AT THE PLATELET LIMIT
7y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673370
ELECTROSTATIC POWDER REMOVER FOR POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674231
Al-RICH AlTiN-BASED FILMS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668858
Titanium Porous Body, and Method for Producing Titanium Porous Body
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 891 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month