Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/677,988

COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING DATA PROCESSING PROGRAM, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, AND DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 30, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, HIEP T
Art Unit
2137
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
747 granted / 790 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
800
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 790 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-9 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As per claim 1: In lines 4-8, the phrasing is unclear. Should the phrase in line 4-8 be replaced with –obtaining , from a terminal of a data viewer, a list including at least one issuer of endorsement data trusted by the viewer, when the terminal requesting a storage server to generate an endorsement graph including the connection of the endorsement data and the authenticity of the data endorsed over the Internet; and --? See also claim 8, lines 4-8 and claim 9, lines 2-7. For claims 2-7: The claims are also rejected as including the deficiency in the independent claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 8 and 9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. None of the prior art of record teaches or fairly suggests claimed features of obtaining, form a terminal of data viewer, the list of endorsement data issuer(s) trusted by the viewer responsive to the request, by the viewer, the endorsement graph that contains connection of the endorsement data and the authenticity of the data endorsed over the Internet; and then caching at least a part of the endorsement graph based on the obtained list. Consequently, claims 2-7 would also be allowable over the prior art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Llore et al., US 9,886,701, teaches generating endorsement log [see col. 1, the last two lines]. Shenoy et al., US 2013/0097143, teaches aggregating endorsement data among users [see para. 0069]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIEP T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4197. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30AM - 4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arpan P. Savla can be reached at 571-272-1077. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HIEP T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2137
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602169
RELIABILITY GAIN IN MEMORY DEVICES WITH ADAPTIVELY SELECTED ERASE POLICIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591373
Reliable Flash Storage
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585401
Cloud-Based Storage Management Of Edge Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566571
COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING A DATA TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12547329
TECHNIQUES FOR MAPPING MEMORY ALLOCATION TO DRAM DIES OF A STACKED MEMORY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 790 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month