Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/678,074

Methods for distributed data management

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
May 30, 2024
Examiner
IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O
Art Unit
2494
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
452 granted / 636 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
662
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 are allowed. Claim Objections Claims 3 -10, 13, and 16-18 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim should refer to other claims in the alternative only. See MPEP § 608.01(n). Accordingly, the claims have not been further treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because claim 20 represents a claim that does not fall within one of the four statutory categories of invention. Since the claimed computer readable media may be software carried on a wave, the claim as a whole can be considered to be only a carrier wave which is not a "process", "machine" or "article of manufacture". The claim may be amended by changing “computer readable medium” to -- non-transitory computer readable medium --, thus excluding that portion of the scope covering transitory signals. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11 - 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Levy, publication number: US 2020/0311307. As per claim 11, Levy teaches A computer implemented method for distributed data management on a central server, comprising: generating a query for a user device (Query, [0057][0095]); sending the query to the user device (Query sent to validators, [0099][0103-0104]); receiving a signed data envelope and an identifier from the user device in response to the query (Support server receiving data from validators, [0110], hints, [0099][0104][0121]); providing the identifier to at least one validator (random shares and lists to S Servers, [0105][0110]); and receiving a result from the at least one validator based on whether data of the signed data envelope satisfies a condition of the query (receiving results regards a match, [0117]). As per claim 12, Levy teaches comprising pushing the signed data envelope and the identifier to the at least one validator, or making the signed data envelope and the identifier available for collection by the at least one validator (multiple s-servers, [0115]). As per claim 13, Levy teaches wherein the central server receives a plurality of signed data envelopes and associated identifiers and provides the plurality of signed data envelopes and associated identifiers to a plurality of validators and combines the results from the plurality of validators (Aggregators, [0114]). As per claims 14 and 19-21, Levy teaches a computer implemented method for distributed data management using a validator, comprising: receiving an identifier of a user device and a query from a central server (Hints [0099][0110][0121][0104] and query [0057][0095]); providing a validation public key (Key, [0081]) and identifier of the user device for the user device (hints, [0099][0104][0121]); receiving a data envelope associated with the identifier of the user device, wherein the data envelope is encrypted with the validation public key (encrypting data, [0081], Hash, [0057]); determining if data in the data envelope satisfies at least one condition of the query (determining match, [0115][0117]); and transmitting to the central server a result based on whether the data in the data envelope satisfies the at least one condition of the query (transmitting match result, [0115][0117]). As per claim 15, Levy teaches wherein the data envelope is signed with a private key forming a key pair with a public key of the user device (Encryption, [0081]). As per claim 16, Levy teaches wherein the validation public key and the identifier of the user device are sent to the user device or made available for the user device to collect (Key, [0081], Hint, [0104]). As per claim 17, Levy teaches wherein receiving an identifier of a user device and a query from a central server comprises receiving a plurality of identifiers and selecting one for processing (aggregator, [0115]). As per claim 18, Levy teaches wherein the validator is a user device (S-server, [0108-0113]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLUGBENGA O IDOWU whose telephone number is (571)270-1450. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jung Kim can be reached at 5712723804. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLUGBENGA O IDOWU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2494
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591707
Privacy Preserving Insights and Distillation of Large Language Model Backed Experiences
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587397
MULTI DIMENSION BLOCKCHAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585753
VALIDATED MOVEMENT OF SHARED IHS HARDWARE COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562912
APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) PROVISIONING USING DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556416
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ATOMIC, CONSISTENT AND ACCOUNTABLE CROSS-CHAIN REWRITING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+19.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month