Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/678,867

AUXILIARY CIRCUIT FOR ESTIMATING MILLER PLATEAU, AND DRIVING CIRCUIT AND POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 30, 2024
Priority
Sep 18, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0124254
Examiner
SKIBINSKI, TOMI SWEET
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
737 granted / 881 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
891
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
77.8%
+37.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 881 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 14-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nishimura (US PGPUB 2024/0106424). Regarding claim 1, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses an auxiliary circuit configured to estimate a Miller plateau of a power transistor in a power conversion system, the auxiliary circuit comprising: a filtering circuit [Cfb and RFB] electrically connected to a switching node of the power conversion system and configured to filter a voltage of the switching node [SN] a sensing circuit electrically connected to an output node of the filtering circuit and configured to detect whether the voltage of the switching node becomes equal to a predetermined voltage level based on a voltage of the output node of the filtering circuit [202B; paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2] Regarding claim 2, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein an output node of the sensing circuit is electrically connected to a gate driver for the power transistor [203B]. Regarding claim 3, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein the sensing circuit is further configured to detect a zero-crossing of the voltage of the switching node [paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2; Figure 3]. Regarding claim 4, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein the sensing circuit is further configured to detect a zero-crossing of the voltage of the switching node from a negative direction to a positive direction [paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2; Figure 3]. Regarding claim 5, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein the sensing circuit is further configured to output a low state output signal or a high state output signal based on a detection result, and wherein the sensing circuit is further configured to change the output signal from a low state to a high state based on the voltage of the switching node becoming equal to the predetermined voltage level [paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2; Figure 3]. Regarding claim 14, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein the filtering circuit comprises a high pass filter configured to filter a voltage of the switching node [Cfb and RFB]. Regarding claim 15, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses a driving circuit for a power conversion system, the driving circuit comprising: an auxiliary circuit configured to estimate a Miller plateau of a power transistor [200B] a gate driver electrically connected to the auxiliary circuit [203B] wherein the auxiliary circuit comprises a filtering circuit [Cfb and RFB] electrically connected to a switching node of the power conversion system and configured to filter a voltage of the switching node [SN] a sensing circuit electrically connected to an output node of the filtering circuit and configured to detect whether the voltage of the switching node becomes equal to a predetermined voltage level based on the voltage of the output node of the filtering circuit, and wherein the gate driver is configured to drive the power transistor based on a detection result of the sensing circuit [202B; paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2] Regarding claim 16, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein the sensing circuit is further configured to output a low state output signal or a high state output signal based on the detection result, and wherein the gate driver is further configured to drive the power transistor based on the output signal of the sensing circuit [paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2; Figure 3]. Regarding claim 17, Figure 2B of Nishimura discloses wherein the gate driver is further configured to drive the power transistor to increase the gate voltage of the power transistor by a first increment amount based on the output signal of the sensing circuit being in the low state, and to drive the power transistor to increase the gate voltage of the power transistor by a second increment amount greater than the first increment amount based on the output signal of the sensing circuit changing from the low state to the high state [paragraphs 37 and 38; paragraph 2; Figure 3]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 18-20 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tomi S Skibinski whose telephone number is (571)270-7581. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. 8am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at (571)270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOMI SKIBINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 22, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671417
QUBIT STATE PREPARATION USING QUANTUM STEERING
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665549
Radio-frequency Mixer having Transformer with Passive Termination
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658807
DATA TRANSFER THROUGH AN ISOLATED POWER CONVERTER
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656810
CLOCK TREE ROUTING IN A CHIP STACK
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658343
Signal Control Using Temperature and Resistivity Changes in a Conductor
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.2%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 881 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month