Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/679,103

BRACKET ASSEMBLIES, WIRING HARNESS INTEGRATION ASSEMBLIES, AND BATTERY MODULES

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 30, 2024
Priority
Jun 16, 2023 — CN 202321556707.1
Examiner
LYNCH, VICTORIA HOM
Art Unit
1724
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
733 granted / 849 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 849 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections 2. Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: the limitation “the acquisition wiring harness are arranged” in line 12 includes a drafting error. Appropriate correction is required. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as “the acquisition wiring harness is arranged”. 3. Claim 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: the limitation “the acquisition wiring harness are arranged” in line 15 includes a drafting error. Appropriate correction is required. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as “the acquisition wiring harness is arranged”. 4. Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: the limitation “wherein wherein there is a gap” includes a drafting error. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as “wherein there is a gap”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 6. Claims 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 7. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the fixing part" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as "the fixing portion" as there is antecedent basis. 8. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the two second connecting parts" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as "the two second connecting portions" as there is antecedent basis. 9. Claim 7 is rejected as depending from claim 6. 10. Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 11. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the fixing part" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as "the fixing portion" as there is antecedent basis. 12. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the two second connecting parts" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as "the two second connecting portions" as there is antecedent basis. 13. Claim 14 is rejected as depending from claim 13. 14. Claims 16 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 16 recites the limitation “the bracket assembly for a battery module” in line 6. It is not clear whether it is the same or different battery module as recited in line 1. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as “the bracket assembly for the battery module”. 15. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the cells" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this Office Action, the limitation has been interpreted as "the plurality of cells" as there is antecedent basis. 16. Claims 17-20 are rejected as depending from claim 16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 17. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 18. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-12 and 14-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oshiba et al. (US 2014/0370341) as cited in IDS dated 3/26/25. Regarding claim 1, Oshiba discloses a bracket assembly for a battery module(Figs. 4 & 6-9, [0030], [0053]-[0055], [0064]-[0065], [0074]-[0083], [0097], [0098], [0104]-[0112]), comprising: a wiring harness bracket (restricting component 300, Figs. 4, & 6-8) configured to mount an acquisition wiring harness(wiring 440, Figs. 3 & 4, [0076]-[0079]), wherein a side of the wiring harness bracket is provided with a mounting portion (main body 511, Figs. 7-9) for mounting a connector, and a first connecting portion is protrudingly arranged on the mounting portion(rails and square holes on the inner surface of 511a in Fig. 9); and a fixing bracket (connector holder 512, Figs. 8 & 9) detachably connected ([0108]) to the wiring harness bracket(Fig. 7), wherein the fixing bracket comprises a fixing portion (openings 512 a-c, Fig. 9) and a second connecting portion (the extremities of 512, the connector holder 512 being inserted into a groove formed in the connector holder attachment portion 511a, [0108], Fig. 9) that are connected to each other, the fixing portion is configured to mount the connector([0111]-[0112]), and the second connecting portion is detachably connected to the first connecting portion(Figs 8 & 9). Regarding claim 2, Oshiba discloses a sliding block is connected to a side of the second connecting portion facing the first connecting portion, the first connecting portion is provided with a chute at a side of the first connecting portion facing the second connecting portion, the chute extends in a direction away from the mounting portion, the chute forms a mounting port at a side of the first connecting portion away from the mounting portion, and the sliding block is slidably fitted into the chute through the mounting port (see sliding and locking engagement of 512 with chamfered edges and 511 with rails in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 3, Oshiba discloses a stop block is protrudingly arranged on a bottom of the chute, a side of the sliding block facing the stop block is provided with an avoidance slot, the avoidance slot extends through the sliding block in a sliding direction of the sliding block, the avoidance slot is configured to avoid the stop block, an abutment block is protrudingly arranged on a bottom of the avoidance slot, and the abutment block is configured to abut against a side of the stop block away from the mounting port(see sliding and locking engagement of 512 and 511 with engagement portions 511 c in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 4, Oshiba discloses there is a gap between the sliding block and the second connecting portion, stop portions are protrudingly arranged on two opposite side walls of the chute, and each of the stop portions is configured to abut against a side of the sliding block facing the second connecting portion ( see pair of brackets around attachment portion 511 a in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 5, Oshiba discloses there are two first connecting portions protrudingly arranged on the mounting portion(rails and square holes on the inner surface of 511 a in Fig.9), the two first connecting portions are arranged side by side in a first direction(see Y direction in Fig. 9); the fixing bracket comprises two second connecting portions (the extremities of 512 in Fig. 9) connected to opposite ends of the fixing portion in the first direction, and the two second connecting portions are connected in one-to-one correspondence with the two first connecting portions(Fig. 8). Regarding claim 7, Oshiba discloses the first side surface is provided with at least two mounting slots, and the at least two mounting slots are spaced apart from each other in the first direction(see Y direction in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 8, Oshiba discloses a wiring harness integration assembly([0030], [0064]-[0065], [0074]-[0083], [0097], [0098], [0104]-[0112], Figs. 4 & 6-9), comprising: a bracket assembly([0053]-[0055], Figs. 4 & 6-9), an acquisition wiring harness (wiring 440, Figs. 3 & 4, [0076]-[0079]) and a connector (Figs. 4 & 9); wherein the bracket assembly for a battery module comprises: a wiring harness bracket (restricting component 300, Figs. 4, & 6-8) configured to mount the acquisition wiring harness (wiring 440, Figs. 3 & 4, [0076]-[0079]), wherein a side of the wiring harness bracket is provided with a mounting portion (main body 511, Figs. 7-9) for mounting the connector, and a first connecting portion is protrudingly arranged on the mounting portion (rails and square holes on the inner surface of 511a in Fig. 9); and a fixing bracket (connector holder 512, Figs. 8 & 9) detachably connected ([0108]) to the wiring harness bracket (Fig. 7), wherein the fixing bracket comprises a fixing portion (openings 512 a-c, Fig. 9) and a second connecting portion (the extremities of 512, the connector holder 512 being inserted into a groove formed in the connector holder attachment portion 511a, [0108], Fig. 9) that are connected to each other, the fixing portion is configured to mount the connector ([0111]-[0112]), and the second connecting portion is detachably connected to the first connecting portion (Fig 9); wherein the acquisition wiring harness is arranged on the wiring harness bracket of the bracket assembly(Figs. 3 & 4); and wherein the connector is mounted on the fixing portion of the fixing bracket in the bracket assembly(Fig. 9), the connector is electrically connected to the acquisition wiring harness([0112]). Regarding claim 9, Oshiba discloses a sliding block is connected to a side of the second connecting portion facing the first connecting portion, the first connecting portion is provided with a chute at a side of the first connecting portion facing the second connecting portion, the chute extends in a direction away from the mounting portion, the chute forms a mounting port at a side of the first connecting portion away from the mounting portion, and the sliding block is slidably fitted into the chute through the mounting port (see sliding and locking engagement of 512 with chamfered edges and 511 with rails in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 10, Oshiba discloses a stop block is protrudingly arranged on a bottom of the chute, a side of the sliding block facing the stop block is provided with an avoidance slot, the avoidance slot extends through the sliding block in a sliding direction of the sliding block, the avoidance slot is configured to avoid the stop block, an abutment block is protrudingly arranged on a bottom of the avoidance slot, and the abutment block is configured to abut against a side of the stop block away from the mounting port(see sliding and locking engagement of 512 and 511 with engagement portions 511 c in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 11, Oshiba discloses there is a gap between the sliding block and the second connecting portion, stop portions are protrudingly arranged on two opposite side walls of the chute, and each of the stop portions is configured to abut against a side of the sliding block facing the second connecting portion ( see pair of brackets around attachment portion 511 a in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 12, Oshiba discloses there are two first connecting portions protrudingly arranged on the mounting portion(rails and square holes on the inner surface of 511 a in Fig.9), the two first connecting portions are arranged side by side in a first direction(see Y direction in Fig. 9); the fixing bracket comprises two second connecting portions (the extremities of 512 in Fig. 9) connected to opposite ends of the fixing portion in the first direction, and the two second connecting portions are connected in one-to-one correspondence with the two first connecting portions(Fig. 8). Regarding claim 14, Oshiba discloses the first side surface is provided with at least two mounting slots, and the at least two mounting slots are spaced apart from each other in the first direction(see Y direction in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 15, Oshiba discloses at least one side of the connector is provided with an elastic member, the elastic member abuts against a side wall of a mounting slot on the fixing portion so that the connector is mounted into the mounting slot (see elastic members on connectors 513 through 515 in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 16, Oshiba discloses a battery module (Fig. 1, [0051]-[0054]) comprising a plurality of cells (200, Fig. 4 & 5, [0064]) and a wiring harness integration assembly ([0030], [0064]-[0065], [0074]-[0083], [0097], [0098], [0104]-[0112], Figs. 4 & 6-9), wherein the plurality of cells are electrically connected to the wiring harness integration assembly([0065], [0077]-[0080]), wherein the wiring harness integration assembly comprises a bracket assembly ([0053]-[0055], Figs. 4 & 6-9), an acquisition wiring harness (wiring 440, Figs. 3 & 4, [0076]-[0079]) and a connector (Figs. 4 & 9), wherein the bracket assembly for the battery module comprises: a wiring harness bracket (restricting component 300, Figs. 4, & 6-8) configured to mount the acquisition wiring harness (wiring 440, Figs. 3 & 4, [0076]-[0079]), wherein a side of the wiring harness bracket is provided with a mounting portion (main body 511, Figs. 7-9) for mounting the connector, and a first connecting portion is protrudingly arranged on the mounting portion (rails and square holes on the inner surface of 511a in Fig. 9); and a fixing bracket (connector holder 512, Figs. 8 & 9) detachably connected ([0108]) to the wiring harness bracket (Fig. 7), wherein the fixing bracket comprises a fixing portion (openings 512 a-c, Fig. 9) and a second connecting portion the extremities of 512, the connector holder 512 being inserted into a groove formed in the connector holder attachment portion 511a, [0108], Fig. 9) that are connected to each other, the fixing portion is configured to mount the connector ([0111]-[0112]), and the second connecting portion is detachably connected to the first connecting portion (Fig 9); wherein the acquisition wiring harness is arranged on the wiring harness bracket of the bracket assembly (Figs. 3 & 4); and wherein the connector is mounted on the fixing portion of the fixing bracket in the bracket assembly (Fig. 9), the connector is electrically connected to the acquisition wiring harness ([0112]). Regarding claim 17, Oshiba discloses at least one side of the connector is provided with an elastic member, the elastic member abuts against a side wall of a mounting slot on the fixing portion so that the connector is mounted into the mounting slot (see elastic members on connectors 513 through 515 in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 18, Oshiba discloses a sliding block is connected to a side of the second connecting portion facing the first connecting portion, the first connecting portion is provided with a chute at a side of the first connecting portion facing the second connecting portion, the chute extends in a direction away from the mounting portion, the chute forms a mounting port at a side of the first connecting portion away from the mounting portion, and the sliding block is slidably fitted into the chute through the mounting port (see sliding and locking engagement of 512 with chamfered edges and 511 with rails in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 19, Oshiba discloses a stop block is protrudingly arranged on a bottom of the chute, a side of the sliding block facing the stop block is provided with an avoidance slot, the avoidance slot extends through the sliding block in a sliding direction of the sliding block, the avoidance slot is configured to avoid the stop block, an abutment block is protrudingly arranged on a bottom of the avoidance slot, and the abutment block is configured to abut against a side of the stop block away from the mounting port(see sliding and locking engagement of 512 and 511 with engagement portions 511 c in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 20, Oshiba discloses there is a gap between the sliding block and the second connecting portion, stop portions are protrudingly arranged on two opposite side walls of the chute, and each of the stop portions is configured to abut against a side of the sliding block facing the second connecting portion ( see pair of brackets around attachment portion 511 a in Fig. 9). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 19. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 20. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oshiba et al. (US 2014/0370341) as cited in IDS dated 3/26/25 as applied to claims 1 and 5 above. Regarding claim 6, Oshiba discloses the fixing portion comprises a first side surface and a second side surface opposite to each other in a second direction(see 512 a-c in X direction in Fig. 9), the first side surface is provided with a mounting slot, the mounting slot extends in the second direction and extends through the second side surface, and a side wall of the mounting slot is configured to abut against the connector(Fig. 9), the two second connecting portions are connected at the edge of one of the side surfaces (Fig. 9) but does not explicitly disclose the two second connecting parts are connected to the second side surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the two second connecting parts are connected to the second side surface, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 244.04 (VI-C). 21. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oshiba et al. (US 2014/0370341) as cited in IDS dated 3/26/25 as applied to claims 8 and 12 above. Regarding claim 13, Oshiba discloses the fixing portion comprises a first side surface and a second side surface opposite to each other in a second direction(see 512 a-c in X direction in Fig. 9), the first side surface is provided with a mounting slot, the mounting slot extends in the second direction and extends through the second side surface, and a side wall of the mounting slot is configured to abut against the connector(Fig. 9), the two second connecting portions are connected at the edge of one of the side surfaces (Fig. 9) but does not explicitly disclose the two second connecting parts are connected to the second side surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the two second connecting parts are connected to the second side surface, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 244.04 (VI-C). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICTORIA HOM LYNCH whose telephone number is (571)272-0489. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM - 4:30 PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at 571-270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VICTORIA H LYNCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770953
BATTERY ELECTRIC SYSTEM WITH ALTERNATING CURRENT SELF-HEATING MODE
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763315
PROCESS FOR MAKING AN ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, AND ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763351
FUEL CELL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FUEL CELL
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763441
POWER STORAGE DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763385
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A RECHARGEABLE ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL OR BATTERY
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 8m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 849 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month