Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/679,711

CIRCUIT BOARD ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
May 31, 2024
Priority
Dec 02, 2021 — CN 202123032771.3 +2 more
Examiner
SMITH, COURTNEY L
Art Unit
2835
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1087 granted / 1272 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1299
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1272 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim(s) 1 and 20; “a floating contact structure” is unclear; whereas the assertion is made without asserting any origin or force deemed to cause a floating movement, and thus the assertion is deemed to read on more than one plausible claim construction which may constitute different inventive structures; wherein an external or manual force on movable parts between the cover and frame may constitute a floating structure for connection/disconnection prior to operation during install or repair, OR during an operative electrical condition of the chip component then a movable connection between the cover and the frame may cause the cover to float upon being heated OR upon selectively disposing a chip component of different sizes then a movable connection between the chip component may be adjusted to varying float positions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 6-13, and 19-20, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (English 2007/0210082). Regarding Claim(s) 1, 20; English discloses an electronic device (as constituted by a cellular telephone or wireless electronic device—as set forth by para. 0171)—claim 20; a circuit board assembly, comprising: a first circuit board, a chip component (whereas assembly-100 includes a circuit board-120 mounting a heat generating electronic component 116 defining an integrated circuit—as set forth by para. 0069 or microelectronic device—para. 0061), and at least one heat sink (110), and atleast one first shielding component located on a periphery of the chip component (as depicted by frame-102 is disposed around a periphery of 116-as depicted by Fig.’s 1-5; whereas an EMI shielding and thermal management assembly includes a frame—as set forth by para. 0066), and suggests wherein one side of the chip component is electrically connected to the first circuit board (as depicted by Fig. 1—whereas a bottom side of 116 is mounted to the pcb, and where the integrated circuit package or microelectronic device-116 is mounted on the printed circuit board, suggests operative electrical connection thereto via SMT, as set forth by para. 0061), and the other side of the chip component is in contact with the heat sink (whereas 116 is thermally coupled to the heat sink-110 via thermal interfaces 106—as set forth by para. 0071); and each first shielding component of the at least one first shielding component comprises a shielding frame and a shielding cover (as depicted by Fig.’s 1-5; whereas the EMI shielding and thermal management assembly includes the frame-102 and a cover 104—as set forth by para.’s 0066 and 0068); an end that is of the shielding frame and that is away from the shielding cover is fastened to the first circuit board (as depicted by Fig.’s 1-5—whereas a free end of 102 contacts the pcb via solder, as set forth by para. 0006 and 0061), and at least a part of the shielding cover is located between the chip component and the heat sink (as depicted by Fig.’s 1-5—whereas atleast surface(s) of 104 that corresponds to 106 or 108 is disposed between 116 and 110 OR atleast edges defining a horizontal and perimeter surface of 104 is disposed at a horizontal plane between 116 and 110); and the shielding cover is movably connected to the shielding frame to form a floating contact structure, so that the shielding cover is capable of moving in a vertical direction relative to the shielding frame (as depicted by Fig.’s 4-5 respectively, whereas in atleast one construction the cover is attached to the frame in a first latched position and a second latched position in which the cover constitutes vertical movement relative to the frame by being movable downward —as set forth by para.’s 0002 and 0058; and as further set forth by para. 0067—whereas a relatively small movement of the cover results from thermal contraction in which the cover can generate a force on the thermal interface/phase change material i.e. at 106). Except English does not explicitly disclose the one side of the chip electrically connected to the first circuit board; and the shielding cover is movably connected to the shielding frame to form a floating contact structure. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the suggested one side at a bottom surface of the microelectronic device as electrically connecting the pcb via a surface mount technology soldering process since it was known in the art that the assembly may be automated with reduced inductance and resistance enhancing electronic function. Note: In accordance to a desired float type and origin or force thereon along with associated manual, install and/or operational attributes then other 103 rejection(s) may be applicable when modifying a selected thickness of a thermal interface material based in-part on a height of the cover and the component—as set forth by para.’s 0067(last three lines) and compressible flexibility of the interface material at 0169. Further, Note: para. 0063 discloses varying corresponding i.e. ribs, slots may couple between the cover and the frame. Regarding Claim 6; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 1, further comprising at least one second shielding component, wherein the second shielding component is located between the shielding cover and the heat sink (whereas 108 constitutes a second shielding component between the cover 104 and the heat sink 110; wherein para. 0071 discloses 108 comprises EMI/RFI absorbing particles). Regarding Claim 7; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 6, wherein the second shielding component is of an elastic shielding material (wherein para. 0071 discloses 108 comprises elastic materials including silicone elastomer and/or fiberglass mesh and rubber). Regarding Claim 8; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 1, wherein the shielding cover comprises a first portion (as constituted by a top horizontal surface of 104) and a second portion connected to the first portion (as constituted by a vertical side surfaces of 104 connected to the top first portion); and at least a part of the first portion is located between the chip component and the heat sink (whereas the top horizontal portion of 104 is between the chip and the heat sink—as depicted by Fig. 1), and the second portion is movably connected to the shielding frame, so that the shielding cover is capable of moving in the vertical direction relative to the shielding frame (as depicted by Fig.’s 1-3--whereas the vertical side portion of 104 comprises movable fastens to vertical side portions of the frame—as further set forth by para.’s 0063 and 0074, wherein the cover is pressed vertically downward onto the frame and a locking snap engages the frame). Regarding Claim 9; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 8, wherein the shielding frame comprises a third portion and a fourth portion connected to the third portion; and an end that is of the third portion and that is away from the fourth portion is fastened to the first circuit board, and the fourth portion is parallel to the first portion (as depicted by Fig. 1—whereas an end of a vertical frame portion is soldered to the circuit board, and is disposed away from a horizontal third portion from which 102 extends). Regarding Claim 10; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 9, wherein the second portion is movably connected to the third portion, so that the shielding cover is capable of moving in the vertical direction relative to the shielding frame (as already set forth by para.’s 0063 and 0074, and depicted by Fig.’s 1-3). Regarding Claim 11; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 10, wherein the second portion is parallel to the third portion (as already set forth—whereas each portion is vertically disposed). Regarding Claim 12; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 10, wherein a protruding portion is disposed on one of the second portion and the third portion, and an opening is disposed on one of the second portion and the third portion; and the protruding portion moves back and forth in the opening in the vertical direction (as already set forth by para.’s 0063 and 0074—whereas the second portion of the cover-104 comprises interlocked or snapped the third portion of the frame, and one of the second portion or the third portion may comprise openings e.g., recesses, voids, cavities, slots, grooves, holes, depressions, combinations thereof, etc which constitutes atleast in part extending vertically and the other of the second portion and third portion comprises protrusions which is interlocked or snapped when the cover is pressed vertically downward). Regarding Claim 13; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 12, except, explicitly wherein a size of the opening in the vertical direction is greater than a size of the protruding portion in the vertical direction. However, it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to modify the size of the opening in the vertical direction so as to readily receive a protrusion of a smaller size in accordance with corresponding shapes and/or to reduce a pressing force to prevent damage thereto, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of a component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). Regarding Claim 19; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 1, wherein the heat sink comprises a heat sink body and a boss connected to the heat sink body; and a surface that is of the boss and that is away from the heat sink body is in contact with the chip component (as depicted by Fig.1 whereas 108 constitutes a base connected to a bottom surface of heat sink 110, wherein 108 is metal or fiberglass meshes in a base of rubber—as set forth by para. 0071). Claim(s) 2-5, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (English 2007/0210082) as applied to claim 1 above, in view of (Xiong 2023/0290743). Regarding Claim 2; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 1, except explicitly wherein the chip component comprises a chip body and a second circuit board connected to the chip body; and a surface that is of the second circuit board and that is away from the chip body is electrically connected to the first circuit board, and a surface that is of the chip body and that is away from the second circuit board is in contact with the heat sink. However, Xiong the chip component comprises a chip body and a second circuit board connected to the chip body; and a surface that is of the second circuit board and that is away from the chip body is electrically connected to the first circuit board, and a surface that is of the chip body and that is away from the second circuit board is in contact with the heat sink (whereas 2-Fig. 2 constitutes a chip package including a chip-21 and a mechanical part-24, and a first circuit board electrically connected via electrical connection structure-3 to a second circuit board-1), and thus it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the first circuit board electrically connected to a second circuit since it was known in the art that that electrical interconnection to another electronic component may be employed so as to enhance design flexibility in accordance with a desired application. Regarding Claim 3; English discloses the circuit board assembly according to claim 2, further comprising a heat conducting member, wherein the heat conducting member is located between the chip body and the heat sink (as depicted by Fig. 1--whereas 106 constitutes a heat conducting member between the chip body and the heat sink). Regarding Claim 4; English discloses the already modified circuit board assembly according to claim 2, wherein the chip component further comprises a mechanical part, the mechanical part and the chip body are located on a same surface of the second circuit board, and the mechanical part is located on a periphery of the chip body, and the at least a part of the shielding cover is located between the mechanical part and the heat sink (as already modified by mechanical part 24 disposed at a periphery of the chip body-21, and further wherein a height of a reinforcement structure including a cover portion 72 has a height larger than the chip package structure-2 which includes the mechanical part—as set forth by para. 0023). Regarding Claim 5; English discloses the already modified circuit board assembly according to claim 2, wherein the second circuit board is electrically connected to the first circuit board through at least one electrical connector (as already set forth); and a projection region of the at least one electrical connector on the first circuit board is located in a projection region of the first shielding component on the first circuit board (whereas Xiong -Fig. 2 depicts the electrical connection structure includes a ball grid array extending from the first second board within a projection region of shield component 7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-18, are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding Claim 14; the circuit board assembly according to claim 10, wherein a first avoidance opening is disposed on the fourth portion; and the second portion passes through the first avoidance opening, and the second portion moves back and forth in an extension direction of the first avoidance opening. Regarding Claim 17; the circuit board assembly according to claim 10, wherein a second avoidance opening is disposed on an end that is of the third portion and that is close to the first circuit board; the shielding cover further comprises a sixth portion, wherein the sixth portion is connected to an end that is of the second portion and that is away from the first portion; and the sixth portion extends into the second avoidance opening, and the sixth portion moves back and forth in the second avoidance opening in the vertical direction. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot; whereas modified rejection(s) are herein presented to read on the amended claim language. The office hereby notes that the applicant may consider the tapered construction of 132 in combination with 170 and the relative difference in depths, heights or thicknesses thereof in the vertical direction—as depicted by Fig.’s 15 and 17 so as to present a distinct claim construction. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COURTNEY SMITH whose telephone number is (571)272-9094. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jayprakash Gandhi can be reached at 571-272-3740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COURTNEY L SMITH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2835
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750984
Server Rack for Electronic Components
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745368
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN INTERLOCKING FEATURE ON A POWER MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745638
PIEZOELECTRIC MEMS-BASED ACTIVE COOLING FOR HEAT DISSIPATION IN COMPUTE DEVICES
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744364
CONTROL HOUSING SYSTEM AND SELF-DRIVING VEHICLE HAVING A CONTROL HOUSING SYSTEM OF THIS TYPE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745375
DRY COOLING ARRANGEMENT FOR A DATACENTER
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month