Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/680,439

FLUID CONTROL DEVICES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 31, 2024
Examiner
TU, AURELIE H
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Magnolia Medical Technologies Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
126 granted / 227 resolved
-14.5% vs TC avg
Strong +62% interview lift
Without
With
+62.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
288
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§103
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 227 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 2-35 are currently pending. Claims 2-22 remain withdrawn. Claims 23, 28, 30, and 31 have been amended. Claims 32-35 have been added. Claim Objections Claim 34 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the blood barrier” in line 2 of claim 34 should read as “the selectively permeable blood barrier”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 23-35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rogers et al. ‘445 (US Pub No. 2018/0177445 – previously cited). Regarding claim 23, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches a device (Title), comprising: a containment channel (Fig. 23C sequestration chamber 2320 and [0137]) in fluid communication with an inlet (Fig. 23C inlet port 2316 and [0137]) and an outlet (Fig. 24B one or more apertures 2424 and ([0141]); a sampling channel (Fig. 24B blood sequestration chamber 2418 and [0141]) in fluid communication with the inlet and the outlet ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420, forcing the inner chamber housing to the second position.”); a selectively permeable blood barrier (Fig. 24B blood barrier 2420 and [0142]) disposed between the containment channel and the outlet (Fig. 24B one or more apertures 2424 and ([0141]), the selectively permeable blood barrier configured such that a suction force introduced at the outlet causes (i) a flow of gas from the containment channel through the selectively permeable blood barrier and (ii) a volume of blood to flow into the containment channel and toward the selectively permeable blood barrier ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420, forcing the inner chamber housing to the second position.”); and a movable seal disposed, in a first state, between the inlet and the sampling channel to prevent the volume of blood from flowing through the sampling channel to the outlet, the movable seal configured to transition from the first state to a second state in response to an increase in a portion of the suction force in the sampling channel, wherein the increase in the portion of the suction force is a result of the volume of blood in the containment channel ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420…”). Regarding claim 24, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches a housing (Fig. 23C blood sequestration device 2300’ and [0137]) having the inlet (Fig. 23C inlet port 2316 and [0137]) and the outlet (Fig. 24B one or more apertures 2424 and ([0141]), the housing defining each of the containment channel (Fig. 23C sequestration chamber 2320 and [0137]) and the sampling channel ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420, forcing the inner chamber housing to the second position.”). Regarding claim 25, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches a flow path between an end portion of the containment channel and the outlet, at least a portion of the flow path is configured to modulate the suction force introduced at the end portion of the containment channel ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420, forcing the inner chamber housing to the second position.”). Regarding claim 26, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches the inlet configured to be fluidically coupled to a patient ([0137]; “an inlet port 2316 to connect with a patient needle”). Regarding claim 27, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches the outlet configured to be fluidically coupled to a sample bottle that is at least partially evacuated, wherein fluidically coupling the outlet to the sample bottle introduces the suction force at the outlet ([0058]; “Vacutainer”). Regarding claim 28, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein the movable seal comprises an elastomeric material ([0145]; “elastomeric material”). Regarding claim 29, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein a portion of the sampling channel is physically and fluidically disposed between the selectively permeable blood barrier and the outlet (see Fig. 24B). Regarding claim 30, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein a portion of the movable seal, in the second state, defines a portion of a flow path through the sampling channel ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420, forcing the inner chamber housing to the second position.”). Regarding claim 31, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein the sampling channel, when the movable seal is in the second state, is configured such that the suction force along the flow path draws a subsequent volume of blood from the inlet, through the sampling channel, to the outlet while bypassing at least a portion of the volume of blood contained in the containment channel ([0142]; “In operation, the inner chamber housing 2419 is in the first position toward the inlet port 2412, such that the one or more apertures 2424 are closed, and the blood sequestration chamber 2418 is in a direct path from the patient needle. Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420, forcing the inner chamber housing to the second position.”). Regarding claim 32, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein the movable seal transitioning from the first state to the second state includes the movable seal being moved, in response to the icrease in the portion of the suction force, from a first position to a second position ([0142]; “Upon venipuncture of a patient, and drawing of blood by way of a syringe or Vacutainer, or other blood collection device 2404, the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber 2418. As the initial aliquot of blood flows into the blood sequestration chamber, it displaces air therein and eventually the blood contacts the blood barrier 2420…”). Regarding claim 33, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches a lock configured to engage the movable seal to at least temporarily maintain the movable seal in the second position ([0142]; “locking mechanism”). Regarding claim 34, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein the movable seal is configured to move relative to the blood barrier ([0141]-[0142]; “The blood sequestration chamber 2418…[that includes an air permeable blood barrier 2420]…is movable from a first position to receive and sequester a first aliquot of blood, to a second position to expose one or more apertures 2424 at a proximal end of the inner chamber housing 2419 to allow blood to bypass and/or flow around the inner chamber housing 2419 and through a blood sample channel 2422.”). Regarding claim 35, Rogers et al. ‘445 teaches wherein the housing has an inner surface that defines each of the containment channel and the sampling channel (Blood sequestration device 2300’ has an inner surface that defines the sequestration chamber 2320 and main collection channel 2322, as seen in Fig. 23C in by the tubing.), and the movable seal in the first state forms a seal with a portion of the inner surface to prevent the volume of blood from flowing through the sampling channel ([0137]; “A valve 2324 closes off and opens the collection chamber 2322, and the device 2300’ can be used…”). Response to Arguments Applicant has indicated the amendments to claim 23 would aid in advancing prosecution as Rogers et al. ‘445 does not teach “each and every limitation set forth in the claim.” Examiner respectfully disagrees, as Applicant has failed to indicate which limitations Rogers et al. ‘445 does not teach. Regarding the moveable seal limitation in claim 23, Examiner respectfully disagrees as the one or more apertures 2424 of Rogers et al. ‘445 can be opened and closed, as mentioned in [0142], indicating that there is a seal that can be “moved,” or as interpreted by the Examiner, “opened and closed.” As such, Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive and the 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection has been maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AURELIE H TU whose telephone number is (571)272-8465. The examiner can normally be reached [M-F] 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Valvis can be reached at (571) 272-4233. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AURELIE H TU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 25, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593995
A BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593992
SPHYGMOMANOMETER, PERSONAL AUTHENTICATION METHOD ON A SPHYGMOMANOMETER, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591305
INTELLIGENT HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE AND METHOD WHICH CAN BE CARRIED OUT USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588869
METHOD AND APPARATUS PROVIDING AN ONGOING AND REAL TIME INDICATOR FOR SURVIVAL AND MAJOR MEDICAL EVENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575788
SYSTEMS, METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND DEVICES FOR FACILITATING TREATMENT FOR ANORECTAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DISORDERS OF USERS USING BIOFEEDBACK THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+62.1%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 227 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month