Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/680,670

AERIAL MOBILE SENSING SYSTEM FOR CROP MONITORING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 31, 2024
Examiner
TOPOLSKI, MAGDALENA
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Adaviv
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
301 granted / 542 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
561
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 542 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract is objected to because of the following informalities: The abstract line 1 recites, “The disclosure relates to” which is implied and should be deleted. Furthermore, line 2 recites, “Disclosed herein are” which is also implied and should be deleted. Similarly line 4, “Also disclosed are”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 4-5 recites, “wherein the resource may include”. It is unclear if the resource is required to include one of the limitations due to the presence of the word “may”. Claim 5 recites, “the delivery mechanism may be configured to interact with actuators”. It is unclear whether the mechanism actually interacts with the actuators or not due to the presence of the term “may be”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) in view of Krakowka (PL 239526, provided herein, see English translation provided herein). For claim 1, Krakowka discloses an aerial crop monitoring system (description and figs., claim 1, “a system for monitoring an area”, the system can be used to monitor crops) comprising: a network of connected tension members (3, 4) arranged in a three-dimensional region (see fig. 1); a carriage (13) coupled to the network and configured to travel along the tension members within the three-dimensional region (see fig. 2) to at least one of deliver a resource or capture data (“The monitoring device 12 comprises, depending on the needs, e.g. a vision camera, a thermal imaging camera, a laser scanner or sound sensors, smoke detectors, chemical or biological substances”); and at least one rigid transfer member (5) coupled to the network and arranged at or proximate to an intersection of at least two tension members, wherein the transfer member is configured to direct the carriage between two tension members (see figs. 1, 3-6). For claim 2, Krakowski further discloses wherein the carriage comprises a sensing unit including a sensor array configured to generate and/or collect data corresponding to a facility or product therein (“The monitoring device 12 comprises, depending on the needs, e.g. a vision camera, a thermal imaging camera, a laser scanner or sound sensors, smoke detectors, chemical or biological substances”). For claim 3, Krakowski further discloses wherein the carriage comprises at least one mechanism for delivering a resource to a facility or products therein (“The monitoring device 12 comprises, depending on the needs, e.g. a vision camera, a thermal imaging camera, a laser scanner or sound sensors, smoke detectors, chemical or biological substances”, chemical and biological substances are a resource to the area). For claim 4, Krakowski further discloses wherein the resource may include one or more of a treatment, lighting, irrigation, feeding, or a change in an ambient condition (chemical and biological substances constitute treatment). For claim 5, Krakowski further discloses wherein the delivery mechanism may be configured to interact with actuators installed within the facility to adjust at least one of plant spacing, location, orientation, lighting, irrigation, feeding, HVAC settings, or other facility parameter (chemical and biological substances are an “other” parameter). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art of record is noted as it pertains to aerial camera systems and/or crop monitoring systems. Notably: De Mello Brandao et al. (US 10372987) teaches an aerial crop monitoring system including a camera moving along a tensioned line. Schonherr et al. (US 2022/0240494) also teaches an aerial crop monitoring system including a camera moving along a tensioned line. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAGDALENA TOPOLSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3568. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 5712705301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAGDALENA TOPOLSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595050
ROTORCRAFT WITH A TAIL BOOM HAVING A DUCT-TYPE PORTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580086
A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE LEVEL OF HARASSMENT OF INSECTS ON A PLURALITY OF ANIMALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569738
PORTABLE GOAL FOR PLAYING A GAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557805
Motion-Activated Animal Repelling Device and Kit
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559223
FLOOR ARRANGEMENT IN AN AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+42.6%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 542 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month