Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/680,960

BED WITH FEATURES FOR RISK DETECTION AND REFINING DETECTION OPERATIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 31, 2024
Examiner
SANTOS RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH M
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sleep Number Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 577 resolved
-1.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
591
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 20, it is unclear as to what is the difference between “the general model” and “the model” since “the general model” is just a refining of the model; in other words, in claim 20 “the model” appears to be the same “as the general mode” as set forth in claim 19. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 10, 11, 13-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Youngblood (US 2020/00077942). With respect to claim 1, Youngblood discloses a system (Fig. 1-4) comprising: a bed having a mattress (see para. 0033); one or more sensors configured to: sense at least one physiological phenomenon of a user of the bed (see para. 0109-0115, 0118-0124); generate one or more data streams based on the sensing of the physiological phenomenon of the user; a computing system comprising at least one processor and computer memory, the computing system configured to: receive the one or more data streams; (see para. 0135, 0155) provide, as input, sleep-data from the data stream for the user to a sleep classifier and receive, as output, a sleep metric, (see para. 0156) wherein the sleep classifier comprises a model defining relationships between sleep-data and disorder risk or relevant sleep metric; (para. 0156) use the sleep metric for the user reflective of a phenomena of sleep; and intermittently updating, after generating the sleep metric, the sleep metric using the data streams by changing the model (see para. 0156-0158). PNG media_image1.png 554 738 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, Youngblood discloses wherein intermittently updating, after generating the sleep metric, the sleep metric using the data streams comprises using stored records of previous sleep sessions (see para. 0154). With respect to claim 3, Youngblood discloses wherein the sleep classifier is an insomnia-risk classifier (see para. 0137) With respect to claim 4, Youngblood discloses the computing-system further configured to initiate a home automation device responsive to updating the sleep metric (see para. 0155, 0157). With respect to claim 5, Youngblood discloses wherein the model is created by machine-learning analysis of a training set of training-sleep-data and training-sleep-data (see para. 0154). With respect to claim 10, Youngblood discloses wherein the mattress compresses at least one air bladder and wherein the one or more sensors include a pressure sensor in fluid communication with the air bladder (see para. 0153) . With respect to claim 11, Youngblood discloses wherein the computing-system comprises a single housing that is mechanically connected to a bedframe that supports the mattress (see 0032). With respect to claim 13, Youngblood discloses a controller for a bed, the controller comprising a memory and one or more processors (fig. 2-4), the controller configured to: receive one or more data streams; provide, as input, sleep-data from the data stream for the user to a sleep classifier and receive, as output, a sleep metric, (see para. 0156) wherein the sleep classifier comprises a model defining relationships between sleep-data and disorder risk or relevant sleep metric; (para. 0156) use the sleep metric for the user reflective of a phenomena of sleep; and intermittently updating, after generating the sleep metric, the sleep metric using the data streams by changing the model (see para. 0156-0158). With respect to claim 14, Youngblood wherein the controller is further configured to initiate a home automation device responsive to updating the disorder-risk metric (see para. 0152). With respect to claim 15, Youngblood wherein the model is generated by refining a general model that is trained on a general population according to sensed data of the user gathered while the user sleeps (para. 0154). With respect to claim 16, Youngblood a bed configured to: receive one or more data streams; provide, as input, sleep-data for a user to a disorder-risk classifier and receive, as output, a disorder-risk metric, wherein the disorder-risk classifier comprises a model defining relationships between sleep-data and disorder risk; use the disorder-risk metric for the user reflective of risk that the user will or is experiencing symptoms consistent with a disorder; and intermittently updating, after generating the disorder-risk metric, the disorder-risk metric using the data streams by changing the model (0152, 0153, 0154, 0156-0171). With respect to claim 17, Youngblood wherein the bed is further configured further configured to initiate a home automation device responsive to updating the disorder-risk metric (para. 0152). With respect to claim 18, Youngblood, wherein the data streams includes sensed data of the user collected while the user is sleeping on or proximate to the bed (see para. 0155). With respect to claim 19, Youngblood, wherein the model is generated by refining a general model that is trained on a general population based upon the sensed data of the user collected while the user is sleeping on or proximate to the bed (0153-0157). With respect to claim 20, Youngblood, wherein the general model is configured to predict the disorder risk more accurately for the general population than is the model and wherein the model is configured to predict the disorder risk more accurately for the user of the bed than is the general model (0153-0157). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-9, 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Youngblood (US 2020/00077942) in view of Vakulin et al (US 2021/0327584) With respect to claim 6, Youngblood disclose the system, as set forth above but fails to explicitly teach wherein the sleep classifier is implemented as at least one of the group consisting of a random forest and a passive-aggressive classifier. Vakulin in the same field of endeavor in the subject of sleep disorder identification, discloses wherein the sleep classifier is implemented as at least one of the group consisting of a random forest and a passive-aggressive classifier (see para. 0149). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date for the the sleep classifier is implemented as at least one of the group consisting of a random forest and a passive-aggressive classifier in order to better identify sleep disorders (Vakulin, para. 0012). With respect to claim 7, Vakunin further discloses wherein the sleep-data is a feature vector created from sleep-data for the user across a plurality of sleep sessions (see para. 0140, 0159). With respect to claim 8, Vakunin further discloses wherein the feature vector comprises features selected from the group i) age, ii) gender, iii) respiration rate, iv) heart rate, v) motion, vi) sleep quality, vii) sleep duration, viii) restful sleep duration, viii) time to fall asleep, ix) demographic data, and x) number of individuals in a bed (see the sensor data, para. 0023). With respect to claim 9, Vakunin further discloses wherein the feature vector comprises features selected from the group i) average heart rate, ii) percent of quality values for heart rate estimation, iii) percent motion, iv) restful time, v) respiration rate, vi) sleep debt, vii) sleep duration, and viii) sleep quality (para. 0023). With respect to claim 12, Vakunin further discloses wherein the sleep classifier is one of the group consisting of i) a machine-learning classifier, and ii) a regression machine (see para. 0172). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH M SANTOS RODRIGUEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7782. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne M. Kozak can be reached at 571-270-0552. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH M SANTOS RODRIGUEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594022
INTEGRATED, FLEXIBLE, IMPLANTABLE, OPTICAL NEURAL INTERROGATION APPARATUS, COMPUTER-ACCESSIBLE MEDIUM, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR USE AND IMPLEMENTATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594047
CONTRAST AGENT-BASED VASCULAR IMAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593986
TRANSMISSION MODE-PHOTOACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HUMAN BRAIN THROUGH AN ACOUSTIC WINDOW
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588870
ELECTRODE ORIENTATION DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576289
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RELIABLE REPLACEMENT OF ULTRASOUND NEUROMODULATION WEARABLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.9%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month