Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/681,026

MONITORING DEVICE, MONITORING METHOD, AND MONITORING PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §101§103
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Examiner
HAILU, KIBROM T
Art Unit
2461
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
677 granted / 847 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
887
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 847 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-4 are objected to because of the following informalities: The claims include the abbreviation, “INT” for ‘In-band Network Telemetry’. The abbreviation needs to be defined at least where it is mentioned for the first time. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim is directed to a monitoring program. However, as recited, the program is reasonably interpreted as entirely software (as also described in para. [0069] of the spec.), which amounts to a non-statutory descriptive material per se. The claim is directed to the monitoring program, and cited computer in the claim is generic. See MPEP § 2106.01. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guo et al. (US 2021/0281514 A1) in view of Song et al. (US 2021/0084530 A1). Regarding claim 1, Guo discloses a monitoring device (102) comprising: processing circuitry (704) configured to set a first node (232 or 804a) that is a node on a transmission side that switches a route of a packet (204) in user communication to copy the packet in the user communication, enable an INT setting (e.g. figs. 2C-2D, enable to set the in band telemetry data or information as latency, jitter, loss, and so on), and transmit the copied packet to each of routes that are switching destination candidates (paths 1-3) (figs. 2A, 8; paragraph [0051]-[0054], illustrating a network element or router at a transmission side is set that switches or selects a path based on the transmitting the same packet to each path, where the packet is telemetry packet including telemetry information); set a second node (234 or 806a) that is a node on a reception side that accommodates the routes that are switching destination candidates (figs. 2A, 8; paragraph [0051]-[0054], explaining that a network element or router at a reception end is set to receive the packet with telemetry information from each of the corresponding paths in performing the switching or selecting a path). Guo does not explicitly disclose to collect INT information of the copied packet and discard the copied packet, and acquire the INT information of the copied packet from the second node. Song teaches to collect INT information of the copied packet and discard the copied packet, and acquire the INT information of the copied packet from the second node (paragraph [0004]; [0013]; [0041]; [0044]; [0047]-[0049]; and so on). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use to collect INT information of the copied packet and discard the copied packet, and acquire the INT information of the copied packet from the second node as taught by Song into Guo in order to increase accuracy, efficiency, and to reduce congestion. Regarding claim 2, Guo further discloses comprising: processing circuitry configured to visualize communication quality of each of the routes that are the switching destination candidates in the user communication based on the acquired INT information (paragraph [0047]; [0067]; [0069]; [0073]-[0077]; [0089]-[0090]). Regarding claims 3-4, the claims include features identical to the subject matter mentioned in the rejection to claim 1. The claims are mere reformulation of claim 1 in order to define the corresponding method, and a monitoring program, and the rejection to claim 1 is applied hereto. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIBROM T HAILU whose telephone number is (571)270-1209. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, HUY D VU can be reached at (571)272-3155. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIBROM T HAILU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604272
HANDLING OF MEASUREMENT RELAXATION AND OTHER ACTIVITY SKIPPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604216
ALLOCATING RESOURCE ENTITIES FOR TRACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592987
PATH VISIBILITY, PACKET DROP, AND LATENCY MEASUREMENT WITH SERVICE CHAINING DATA FLOWS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581552
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RELAY COMMUNICATION IN SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574898
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND TERMINAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 847 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month