Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/681,336

CAMERA MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Priority
Aug 03, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0102232 +1 more
Examiner
TALLMAN, ROBERT E
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
625 granted / 765 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
786
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
68.9%
+28.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 02/05/2024 and 10/06/2025 were filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, and 5-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a2) as being anticipated by Kim (US 2021/0029280 A1). Regarding claim 1 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module comprising: a first body (300) including a barrel portion having a hole (see annotated fig. 9 below) formed therein; a lens module (100) disposed at least partially in the hole (para. 0086), and includes-including a barrel having a lens disposed therein and a flange (B: see annotated fig. 9 below) portion protruding from the-an outer surface of the barrel to be disposed on the barrel portion (para. 0086); and a ground member having both ends coupled to the barrel portion and the flange portion, respectively (C: see annotated fig. 7 below). [AltContent: textbox (B: flange)] PNG media_image3.png 479 264 media_image3.png Greyscale [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (A: hole)] Regarding claim 2 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the ground member includes a pogo pin (). Regarding claim 3 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the pogo pin includes a body coupled to the barrel portion, and a pin elastically coupled to the body and coupled to the flange portion (para. 0083). Regarding claim 5 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where a groove into which the ground member is coupled is disposed on an upper surface of the barrel portion or a lower surface of the flange portion (see fig. 7). Regarding claim 6 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where a sealing member is disposed between the barrel portion and the flange portion, and the barrel portion and the flange portion are spaced apart in an optical axis direction (see fig. 7). Regarding claim 7 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the first body and the lens module are made of metal, and at least some of the surfaces of the first body and the lens module have a coating region (see fig. 7; para. 0078). Regarding claim 8 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the surface of the barrel portion and the flange portion to which the ground member is coupled are a region other than the coating region, and a metal layer is exposed therefrom (para. 0078). Regarding claim 9 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where a side of the flange portion is disposed more inwardly than a side of the barrel portion, and the ground member is disposed more inwardly than the sealing member (para. 0078). Regarding claim 10 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, comprising: a first body (300; see annotated fig. 9 above in the rejection of claim 1); a lens module disposed on an inner side of the first body (100; para. 0086); and a pogo pin coupled to the first body and the lens module (322; para. 0083). Regarding claim 11 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the sealing member is epoxy (para. 0078). Regarding claim 12 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where an outer surface of the sealing member is inclined to connect a side surface of the flange portion and a side surface of the barrel portion (see fig. 7; para. 0078). Regarding claim 13 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where a groove into which the body is coupled is formed on an upper surface of the barrel portion (see fig. 7), and where, based on an optical axis direction, a length of the groove is equal to a length of the body (see fig. 7). Regarding claim 14 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the first body and the lens module are each ground areas (para. 0090). Regarding claim 15 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where an inner surface of the sealing member is disposed outside an inner surface of the barrel portion (para. 0078). Regarding claim 16 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, further comprising: a second body coupled to a rear of the first body (400); and a substrate disposed between the first body and the second body (Para. 0105). Regarding claim 17 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the first body includes a barrel portion with a hole formed on an inside, where the lens module includes a flange portion disposed on the barrel portion, and where the pogo pin is disposed between the barrel portion and the flange portion (para. 0078). Regarding claim 18 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where a sealing member is disposed between the barrel portion and the flange portion, and the barrel portion and the flange portion are spaced apart in an optical axis direction (para. 0078). Regarding claim 19 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where a side of the flange portion is disposed more inwardly than a side of the barrel portion, and the pogo pin is disposed more inwardly than the sealing member (para. 0078). Regarding claim 20 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, where the first body and the lens module are each ground areas (para. 0090). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 2021/0029280 A1) in view of McKinley (US 2014/0184899 A1). Regarding claim 4 Kim teaches (figs. 2, 3, and 7-15) a camera module, except where the ground member includes a spring. McKinley teaches (fig. 2B) where the ground member includes a spring (para. 0073). It would have been obviously to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have modified the camera system as taught by Kim with the utilization of a spring as taught by McKinley for the benefit of increasing the connection between the bodies through the use of the spring force. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Further similar optical camera modules are taught by Tamasanis et. al. (US 9766473 B1), Noh et. al. (US 2022/0357487 A1), and Noh et. al. (US 2023/0350273 A1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E TALLMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3958. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 a.m. -6 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Robert E. Tallman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12613078
IMAGING APPARATUS WITH THERMAL AUGMENTATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607839
MICROSCOPE SYSTEM AND MICROSCOPE CONTROL DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607902
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AN IMAGING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607786
OPTICAL FILM AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12585097
OPTICAL APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month