Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/681,507

Communicating early and non-early data between a user device and a core network

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
YOUNG, STEVE R
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
385 granted / 577 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
608
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1, 3-7, 11-13, 15-16, 18, 20-23 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US# 2022/0303946 hereinafter referred to as Kim). RE Claim 13, Kim discloses a method implemented in a user equipment (UE) for communicating data with a core network (CN) via a radio access network (RAN) (See Kim FIG 12), the method comprising: performing, by the UE and in an inactive state of a protocol associated with controlling radio resources, an early data communication with the CN (See Kim [0005]-[0006], [0009], [0014] – UE operating in inactive/idle state; protocol to control resources by transmitting using MT-EDT); determining, by the UE and while the UE continues to operate in the inactive state (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – determining RRC state to operate in), whether non-early downlink (DL) data is available for communicating between the UE and the CN, including: receiving, from the RAN and via a non-early data radio bearer, a DL data packet (See Kim [0234]-[0239] – receiving third message which can include DL data), or receiving, from the RAN and via a signaling radio bearer, a message indicating that non-early DL data is available See Kim [0232]-[0239] – third message indicates availability of non-EDT DL data (i.e. indicating to transition to connected state)); and when the non-early data is available, transitioning to a connected state of the protocol See Kim [0232]-[0239] – UE transitioning to connected state). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-7, 12, 18, 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US# 2022/0303946 hereinafter referred to as Kim) in view of Dai et al. (US# 2024/0373497 hereinafter referred to as Dai). RE Claim 1, Kim discloses a method implemented in a base station operating in a radio access network (RAN), for facilitating data communication between a UE and a core network (CN) (See Kim FIG 12), the method comprising: determining, by the base station, that downlink (DL) data received from the CN is available for transmitting to the UE (See Kim [0006], [0009], [0014] – determining DL data for transmitting to the UE) operating in an inactive state of a protocol for controlling radio resources (See Kim [0005]-[0006], [0009], [0014] – UE operating in inactive/idle state; protocol to control resources by transmitting using MT-EDT or not); determining, by the base station, whether the UE can perform early-data communication of second data (See Kim [0178] – determine to use MT-EDT based on UE capability); and selecting, by the base station, a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on (i) whether the UE can perform early-data communication (See Kim [0178] – determine to use MT-EDT based on UE capability) and (ii) whether the DL data qualifies for early data transmission (EDT) to the UE (See Kim [0231]-[0232] – based on size of DL data determines in part whether the data qualifies for EDT). Kim does not specifically disclose determining, by the base station, whether the UE is performing early-data communication of second data; and selecting, by the base station, a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on whether the UE is performing early-data communication. However, Dai teaches of determining, by the base station, whether the UE is performing early-data communication of second data (See Dai [0016], [0091] – base station determining if ongoing SDT communication for the UE); and selecting, by the base station, a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on whether the UE is performing early-data communication (See Dai [0016], [0091] – base station determining a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on determining if ongoing SDT communication for the UE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the EDT communication system, as disclosed in Kim, comprising determining, by the base station, whether the UE is performing early-data communication of second data; and selecting, by the base station, a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on whether the UE is performing early-data communication, as taught in Dai. One is motivated as such in order to improve efficiency while lowering latency and overhead (See Dai Background; Summary). RE Claim 3¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the selecting includes: When the DL data does not qualify for EDT, selecting a paging procedure, including transmitting to the UE a paging message (See Dai [0073] – for non-SDT DL data, sending paging message to UE). RE Claim 4¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the selecting includes: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, selecting a procedure for resuming a suspended radio connection between the UE and the RAN, including transmitting to the UE a command to resume the radio connection, including omitting a paging procedure (See Dai [0091] - In the case that there is an ongoing SDT procedure for the UE, in step 310, the receiving BS may transmit the RRC resume message to indicate the UE to enter into the RRC_CONNECTED state for transmission of the downlink non-SDT data and/or the downlink non-SDT signaling without performing a RAN paging procedure). RE Claim 5¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the selecting includes: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, selecting a procedure for transmitting non-EDT data over a suspended radio connection (See Kim [0234] – deciding RRC state is RRC-IDLE state with suspend), including transmitting to the UE a data packet that includes at least a portion of the DL data, while the UE continues to operate in the inactive state (See Kim [0234]-[0239] – generating third message based on the decided RRC state; third message can include DL data). RE Claim 6¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the selecting includes: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, selecting a procedure for notifying the UE of non-early DL data (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – determining procedure for notifying UE of non EDT), including transmitting to the UE a message associated with the protocol for controlling radio resources (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – i.e. transmitting third message on decided RRC state), the message indicating arrival of the first data, while the UE continues to operate in the inactive state (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – third message indicates arrival of the first data (i.e. DL data can be included in third message) while UE operates in inactive state (i.e. RRC-IDLE)). RE Claim 7¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 1 above, implemented in a central unit (CU) of the base station including the CU and a distributed unit (DU) (See Kim [0215] – i.e. DU connected to CU). RE Claim 12, Kim discloses a base station comprising processing hardware and a transceiver, configured to: determine that downlink (DL) data received from the CN (See Kim FIG 12) is available for transmitting to the UE (See Kim [0006], [0009], [0014] – determining DL data for transmitting to the UE) operating in an inactive state of a protocol for controlling radio resources (See Kim [0005]-[0006], [0009], [0014] – UE operating in inactive/idle state; protocol to control resources by transmitting using MT-EDT or not); determine whether the UE can perform early-data communication of second data (See Kim [0178] – determine to use MT-EDT based on UE capability); and select a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on (i) whether the UE can perform early-data communication (See Kim [0178] – determine to use MT-EDT based on UE capability) and (ii) whether the DL data qualifies for early data transmission (EDT) to the UE (See Kim [0231]-[0232] – based on size of DL data determines in part whether the data qualifies for EDT). Kim does not specifically disclose determining whether the UE is performing early-data communication of second data; and selecting a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on whether the UE is performing early-data communication. However, Dai teaches of determining whether the UE is performing early-data communication of second data (See Dai [0016], [0091] – base station determining if ongoing SDT communication for the UE); and selecting a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on whether the UE is performing early-data communication (See Dai [0016], [0091] – base station determining a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on determining if ongoing SDT communication for the UE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the EDT communication system, as disclosed in Kim, comprising determining whether the UE is performing early-data communication of second data; and selecting a procedure for communicating the DL data based at least in part on whether the UE is performing early-data communication, as taught in Dai. One is motivated as such in order to improve efficiency while lowering latency and overhead (See Dai Background; Summary). RE Claim 18¸ Kim discloses a method, as set forth in claim 13 above. Kim does not specifically disclose further comprising: subsequently to transitioning to the connected state, communicating the non-early DL data using (i) a first radio bearer configured for early data communication and (ii) a second radio bearer configured for non-early data communication. However, Dai teaches of further comprising: subsequently to transitioning to the connected state, communicating the non-early DL data using (i) a first radio bearer configured for early data communication (See Dai [0071] - upon initiating a RRC resume procedure for the SDT initiation (i.e. for the first SDT), the UE may reestablish at least the SDT packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) entities and resume the SDT DRBs that are configured for small data transmission and SDT signaling radio bearer (SRB)) and (ii) a second radio bearer configured for non-early data communication (See Dai [0092] - Then, after receiving the RRC resume message, in step 311, the UE may enter into the RRC_CONNECTED state for receiving the downlink non-SDT data and/or the downlink non-SDT signaling. For example, the UE may resume all non-SDT RBs of the downlink non-SDT data and/or the downlink non-SDT signaling). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the EDT communication system, as disclosed in Kim, further comprising: subsequently to transitioning to the connected state, communicating the non-early DL data using (i) a first radio bearer configured for early data communication and (ii) a second radio bearer configured for non-early data communication, as taught in Dai. One is motivated as such in order to improve efficiency while lowering latency and overhead (See Dai Background; Summary). RE Claim 20¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a base station, as set forth in claim 12 above, wherein to select the procedure, the base station is configured to: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, select a paging procedure, including transmit to the UE a paging message (See Dai [0073] – for non-SDT DL data, sending paging message to UE). RE Claim 21¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a base station, as set forth in claim 12 above, wherein to select the procedure, the base station is configured to: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, select a procedure for resuming a suspended radio connection between the UE and the RAN, including transmit to the UE a command to resume the radio connection, including omitting a paging procedure (See Dai [0091] - In the case that there is an ongoing SDT procedure for the UE, in step 310, the receiving BS may transmit the RRC resume message to indicate the UE to enter into the RRC_CONNECTED state for transmission of the downlink non-SDT data and/or the downlink non-SDT signaling without performing a RAN paging procedure). RE Claim 22¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a base station, as set forth in claim 12 above, wherein to select the procedure, the base station is configured to: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, select a procedure for transmitting non-EDT data over a suspended radio connection (See Kim [0234] – deciding RRC state is RRC-IDLE state with suspend), including transmit to the UE a data packet that includes at least a portion of the DL data, while the UE continues to operate in the inactive state (See Kim [0234]-[0239] – generating third message based on the decided RRC state; third message can include DL data). RE Claim 23¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a base station, as set forth in claim 12 above, wherein to select the procedure, the base station is configured to: when the DL data does not qualify for EDT, select a procedure for notifying the UE of non-early DL data (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – determining procedure for notifying UE of non EDT), including transmit to the UE a message associated with the protocol for controlling radio resources (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – i.e. transmitting third message on decided RRC state), the message indicating arrival of the first data, while the UE continues to operate in the inactive state (See Kim [0232]-[0239] – third message indicates arrival of the first data (i.e. DL data can be included in third message) while UE operates in inactive state (i.e. RRC-IDLE)). Claims 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US# 2022/0303946 hereinafter referred to as Kim) in view of Kim et al. (US# 2024/0155670 hereinafter referred to as Kim ‘670). RE Claim 15¸ Kim discloses a method, as set forth in claim 13 above. Kim does not specifically disclose further comprising: in response to determining that the non-early DL data is available, transmitting to the RAN a request to transition to the connected state. However, Kim ‘670 teaches of in response to determining that the non-early DL data is available (See Kim ‘670 [0089] – can apply to UE for transmit/receive (i.e. UL/DL data)), transmitting to the RAN a request to transition to the connected state (See Kim ‘670 [0007], [0089] - the UE transmits a RRC resume request message for transitioning to a RRC CONNECTED state via a Common Control Channel (CCCH) ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the EDT communication system, as disclosed in Kim, further comprising: in response to determining that the non-early DL data is available, transmitting to the RAN a request to transition to the connected state, as taught in Kim ‘670. One is motivated as such in order to reduce latency of state transition (See Kim ‘670 [0003]-[0010]). RE Claim 16¸ Kim, modified by Dai, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 15 above, wherein transmitting the request includes transmitting a dedicated control channel (DCCH) message or a common control channel (CCCH) message (See Kim ‘670 – i.e. CCCH). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Shah et al. (US# 2024/0196444 – which teaches of handling EDT and non-EDT communication). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steve R Young whose telephone number is (571)270-7518. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G Shah can be reached at (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE R YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598601
RADIO FREQUENCY SHARED PATH INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581395
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIGNALS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580697
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574972
RACH TIMELINE INCORPORATING BANDWIDTH PART SWITCH TO RECEIVE A SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL BLOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574179
ZERO-DELAY GAP PERIOD SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL TRANSMISSIONS WITH ANTENNA SWITCHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+20.5%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month