Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/681,555

METHOD FOR ASCERTAINING THE DEFORMATION OF A TIRE SUBJECTED TO A LOAD WHILE ROLLING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Priority
Aug 06, 2021 — FR FR2108545 +1 more
Examiner
BOLDUC, DAVID J
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
607 granted / 721 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
734
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
84.8%
+44.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 721 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/30/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 23 recites the limitation "the positive energy density S+ and negative energy density S-“. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding Claim 14, the claim recites “defining at least one first energy density S (205) from the at least one portion of the angularly resampled normalized wheel-turn signal SigTdR, S+ when the at least one portion of the angularly resampled normalized wheel-turn signal SigTdR is greater than a threshold A or S-“ which is unclear. It is unclear, as written if S- is an alternative threshold for A. Furthermore, it is unclear whether S- the symbol after S corresponds to a superscript minus sigh, or that it is a hyphen in which case it is grammatically incorrect. The claim will be examined as best can be understood to recite “defining at least one first energy density S (205) from the at least one portion of the angularly resampled normalized wheel-turn signal SigTdR as a positive energy density S+ or a negative energy density S-; wherein the at least one first energy density S is defined as S+ when the at least one portion of the angularly resampled normalized wheel-turn signal SigTdR is greater than a threshold A; and wherein the at least one first energy density S is defined as S-“. This interpretation will also resolve the antecedent basis issue in claim 23. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-26 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID J BOLDUC whose telephone number is (571)270-1602. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay, Jr. can be reached at (571) 272-1672. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID J BOLDUC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629464
DEVICES FOR DELIVERING AT LEAST ONE FLOWING MEDIA, ASSOCIATED SENSOR MODULES, AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF MECHANICALLY AND ELECTRICALLY COUPLING A SENSOR MODULE TO A DEVICE FOR DELIVERING AT LEAST ONE FLOWING MEDIA
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624948
Physical Quantity Sensor And Electronic Device
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618813
METHOD FOR DETECTING GLYCOSIDIC BONDS OF PLANT POLYSACCHARIDES
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12601719
COLUMN DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601675
MAGNETIC PIPE SENSOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 721 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month