Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/681,883

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WATCHING GAME AFTER CHARACTER IS ELIMINATED, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Examiner
CUFF, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Netease (Hangzhou) Network Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
580 granted / 708 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 708 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, a game watching camera, a target camera, a position of the game watching camera, a position of the target camera, an orientation of the game watching camera, an orientation of the target camera, a sliding operation, a marking operation on a map area, a target map area, a click operation on the map area, a long press operation, a first marked point in the map area, a starting point of a route, a continuous sliding operation, an end point of the continuous sliding operation, a second marked point, a marked route, a touch display screen, an initial orientation, a click operation, a direction between a preset point, a clicking position of the click operation, a small window display must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 and 11-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 12 recite, “… in response to that a virtual character corresponding to the terminal device is eliminated; …” Claim 11 recites, “… in response to that a virtual character corresponding to the electronic device is eliminated; …” These phrases are not clear because they are grammatically incorrect and confusing by the order in the claims. The word “that” appears to have been added by mistake. The displaying step is in response to the character being eliminated. It is not wrong to put it at the end of the limitation, but it would be easier to read if the “in response to” phrase came at the beginning of the limitation. When the claims were amended to replace “after” to “in response to”, the verb “is” should probably be changed to “being”. The examiner suggests the following possible verbiage for this limitation, -- in response to a virtual character corresponding to the terminal device being eliminated in the game, displaying, by a terminal device, in a graphical user interface of the terminal device, a game watching screen identical to a target game screen of a target virtual character being watched; -- The examiner also added “in the game” to the phrase “being eliminated”. This is a minor change, but it emphasizes that the game is being played in a virtual environment as part of the claim language. This is important in regards to 35 USC 101. Merely watching and displaying could be considered to be an abstract idea. Playing a game in a virtual environment cannot reasonably be considered a mental process abstract idea. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 11-21 are rejected under 35 USC 112 and the drawings have serious claim related objections, but would be allowable if the application was amended to resolve these issues. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Tieger et al. (US PG pub 2020/0197807) teaches controlling camera perspectives and displays of video gameplay. Yang (US PG pub 2021/0268380) teaches adjusting viewing angles with an onscreen sliding feature. The cited prior art does not show or teach that the above features are triggered by a virtual character elimination. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A CUFF whose telephone number is (571)272-6778. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571 272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL A CUFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582907
DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582914
GAME MANAGEMENT DEVICE, GAME MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558632
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551803
WORD GAME SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551795
AUTOMATED PERSONALIZED VIDEO GAME GUIDANCE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 708 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month