Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/681,887

CODED ANCHORS FOR SIMPLE LOCALIZATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Examiner
LIU, HARRY K
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
1186 granted / 1303 resolved
+39.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1328
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1303 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 3 and 15 are objected to because of the following informalities: missing a period at end of claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-9, 13-21, 23-32, 34-40 and 42-47 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over IWABUCHI (US-20230171624-A1) in view of Geng (US-20220179036-A1). Regarding claims 1, 13, IWABUCHI discloses an apparatus comprising: a processor circuit (processor 131, see Fig. 6, paragraph 0089) and a memory circuit, wherein the memory is arranged to store instructions for the processor circuit (memory 132, Fig. 6, paragraph 0089), wherein the processor circuit is arranged to receive a plurality of coded beams at a receiver via a plurality of non-line-of-sight paths (reflector modulates the incident measurement signal during reflection to add information about a reflection direction ID being different for each of the multiple reflection directions to each of the multiple reflected measurement signals, Abstract)(reflectors are designed to receive and reflect coded beams) from a plurality of reflectors, wherein a first code of the plurality of coded beams identifies a first reflector (see Fig. 2, reflectors 200-A and 200-B receives signals from BS 100, retransmit the signals with beam ID and reflector ID)(paragraph 0041-0044); wherein the processor circuit is arranged to measure at least one propagation parameter for a portion of the plurality of coded beams (reflection direction ID may include both identification information for identifying the reflector 200 and identification information for identifying the reflection direction in the reflector 200, paragraph 0044), IWABUCHI does not specifically disclose the processor circuit is arranged to determine the location of the receiver based on the at least one propagation parameter and a location of identified reflectors. Geng teaches a positioning system using LOS and NLOS signals (reflected from reflector, Abstract) in determining position of a terminal. It would have been obvious to modify IWABUCHI by Gen by taking advantage of coded beams direction ID system and modify the system to do the positioning function which is a very common application. Regarding claims 2-3, 14-15, IWABUCHI as modified with Geng discloses all claim limitations in the rejection of claims 1 and 13 and further discloses performing beamforming (by Geng, paragraph 0015, claims 3), multilateration (triangulation, Abstract, claims 2 and 14) and a mapping database (use of reflection direction ID associating reflector, reflection path and signal originated is a mapping database, for claim 15). Regarding claims 4, 16, 23, 27, 35 and 43, IWABUCHI discloses wherein the reflector comprises a static surface (reflector is static object) or a hardware circuit, wherein the static surface is arranged for reflecting at least one of the plurality of coded beams, wherein the hardware circuit is arranged to retransmit the at least one of the plurality of coded beams (the reflector modulates the incident measurement signal during reflection to add information about a reflection direction ID being different for each of the multiple reflection directions to each of the multiple reflected measurement signals, Abstract)(reflector retransmit with modulated signals). Regarding claims 5, 17, 24, 28, 36 and 44, IWABUCHI discloses wherein the code of at least one of the plurality of coded beams is signaled by a channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) resource indicator or a pre-coded channel state information reference signal measurement signal MS may be a reference signal (measurement signal MS may be a reference signal, paragraph 0041, Fig. 2)(CSI-RS is a term used in 5G to describe channel condition). Regarding claims 6, 18, 25, 29, 37 and 45, IWABUCHI discloses wherein the processor circuit is arranged to distinguish line-of-sight and at least one of a plurality of non-line-of-sight components based on a time of arrival or signal strength or a combination of multiple receipts of a portion of the plurality of coded beams with the same code (determining one LOS path between the reflector and the terminal device may be based on at least one of a power of the second radio signal on each of the two or more paths, paragraph 0010, Geng). Regarding claims 7, 19, 26, 30, 38 and 46, IWABUCHI discloses determining a path length of a second coded beam of the plurality of coded beams based on at least one of a time of flight of the second coded beam or a time of arrival of the second coded beam (using RSSI to process communication quality evaluation with ranking, paragraph 0104-0105)(ranking determines communication path to use for positioning). Regarding claims 8, 20, 31 and 39, Geng discloses wherein the location of the receiver is determined by a localization algorithm (network device can get the terminal device's position with two LOS paths by using triangulation, paragraph 0090)(triangulation is a localization algorithm). Regarding claims 9, 21, 32 and 40, Geng discloses determining the location of the receiver by measuring an angle of arrival for a portion of the plurality of coded beams arriving from two or more of the identified reflectors and using triangulation (refer to rejection of claim 8 above, positioning using triangulation is use of angle of arrival). Regarding claims 34, 42 and 47, IWABUCHI discloses computer program stored on a non-transitory medium, wherein the computer program when executed on a processor performs the method as claimed in claims 13-15 (control program are stored in the memory device 132, the memory device 132 include a volatile memory and a non-volatile memory, paragraph 0089). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10, 22, 33 and 41 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY K LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-1338. The examiner can normally be reached on every M-F 10 AM to 6:30 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please leave a voice message with application serial number and nature of call, a response within 24 hours can be expected during regular business days. Also, the Examiner’s supervisor Hodge, Robert W. can be reached at (571) 272-6496. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-270-2338. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY K LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3645 Tel: (571) 270-1338 Fax: (571) 270-2338 Email: harry.liu@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596166
CONFIGURATION OF POSITIONING MODELS UTILIZING MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596170
REAL-TIME LOCATING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596198
METHOD FOR PROVIDING GNSS-RELEVANT ROUTE INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597687
PHASE SHIFTER, ANTENNA, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585024
IONOSPHERIC SCINTILLATION AND TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+5.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1303 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month