Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/682,041

COMPOSITE MEDICAL BALLOON WITH ENHANCED OUTER FILM LAYER AND RELATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2021 — provisional 63/230,988 +1 more
Examiner
OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
944 granted / 1203 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1236
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1203 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-14) in the reply filed on 7/14/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 9, 12 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al (US 6,756,094) in view of Eskaros et al (US 2008/0140173). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses a composite medical balloon, comprising: a base balloon 118 comprising first and second tapered portions (regions 134 in fig 4) and a barrel portion (center portion between two sections labelled 134) there between, a first neck portion (one of left or right portions labelled 138 in fig 4) adjacent the first tapered portion, and a second neck portion adjacent the second tapered portion (other of portions labelled 138 that is not the first neck portion); and an outer layer 126 overlying the base balloon (fig 4), the outer layer comprising a film including a wider portion for fully covering the barrel portion (fig 2), and narrower portions for covering the first and second tapered portions, the first neck portion and the second neck portion (fig 2) While Wang substantially discloses the invention as claimed, it does not disclose the film having a single longitudinal seam. Eskaros discloses a balloon catheter where it discloses a film having a single longitudinal seam 13 (¶33). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of filing, to modify Wang such that the film has a single longitudinal seam as taught by Eskaros as it is a known, alternative means by which to form a film/outer layer around an internal balloon. Regarding claim 2, further including a fiber layer 122 between the base balloon and the outer layer (Col.4 ll 16-23). Regarding claim 3, wherein the first neck portion is formed as a narrow cylinder fashioned to attach to a catheter shaft (figs 4 and 8). Regarding claim 4, wherein the film forming the outer layer comprises a balloon shaped cut-out having a first portion having a first width approximately the same as a diameter of the barrel portion of the base balloon (fig 4). Regarding claim 5, wherein the balloon shaped cut- out comprises a second portion having a second width approximately the same as a diameter of the first tapered portion of the base balloon (fig 4). Regarding claim 6, wherein the balloon shaped cut- out comprises a third portion having a second width approximately the same as a diameter of the second tapered portion of the base balloon (fig 4). Regarding claim 7, wherein the single longitudinal seam comprises overlapping longitudinal edge portions of the film bonded together (see combination in clam 1 above and fig 8 of Eskaros). Regarding claim 9, wherein the outer layer has a length less than a length of the base balloon (length of center cylindrical section is less than that of all of base balloon). Regarding claim 12, Wang discloses a catheter including a composite medical balloon. See claim 1 above where Wang and Eskaros teach the composite medical balloon of claim 1. Regarding claim 13, Wang discloses a composite medical balloon, comprising: a base balloon 118 comprising a first neck portion (one of left or right portions labelled 138 in fig 4) adjacent a first tapered portion (adjacent portion 134), the first tapered portion meeting a barrel portion (center portion between portions labelled 134), a second tapered portion (other of portion 134 that is not first tapered portion), the second tapered portion meeting a second neck portion (other of portion labelled 138 that is not first neck portion); and an outer layer 126 overlying the base balloon, the outer layer comprising a film including a wider portion for fully covering the barrel portion, narrower portions for covering the first and second tapered portions, the first neck portion and the second neck portion (fig 4). While Wang substantially discloses the invention as claimed, it does not disclose the film having a longitudinal seam formed by a bond facing the base balloon. Eskaros discloses a balloon catheter where it discloses a film having a single longitudinal seam 13 formed by a bond facing the base balloon (¶33). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of filing, to modify Wang such that the film has a single longitudinal seam as taught by Eskaros as it is a known, alternative means by which to form a film/outer layer around an internal balloon. Claim(s) 8 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al (US 6,756,094) in view of Eskaros et al (US 2008/0140173) and Shah (US 5,469,863). Regarding claims 8 and 14, while Wang in view of Eskaros substantially discloses the invention as claimed, it does not disclose the outer layer comprises an everted tube such that the single longitudinal seam faces an outer surface of the base balloon. Shah discloses a device which has a balloon with a longitudinal seam 44 (figs 7 and 8). Shah also discloses in an alternative embodiment (fig 6) that the seam may be external or everted after forming (Col.11 ll 47-50). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of filing, to modify Wang in view of Eskaros such that the outer layer comprises an everted tube such that the single longitudinal seam faces an outer surface of the base balloon as taught suggested by Shah to decrease the device surface area and prevent the seam from damaging tissues as the balloon is inserted and/or inflated. Claim(s) 10 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al (US 6,756,094) in view of Eskaros et al (US 2008/0140173) and Pepper et al (US 2010/0243135). Regarding claims 10 and 11, wherein the film covers a barrel portion of the base balloon (fig 4). While Wang substantially discloses the invention as claimed, it does not disclose further including a different material covering one or both tapered end portions of the balloon, nor the different material comprises a spirally wrapped film. Pepper discloses other methods of making a non-compliant medical balloon, which may include spirally wrapping a film around the tapered end portions (and barrel portion) of the balloon (¶78-¶80). This method allows for varying thickness, pitch and number of wraps to vary the properties of the balloon as desired (¶78-¶80). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of filing, to modify Wang such that it includes a different material covering one or both tapered end portions of the balloon, the different material comprising a spirally wrapped film as taught by Pepper to convey non-compliant properties while also controlling other properties such as thickness and elasticity, as desired. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRADLEY JAMES OSINSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3640. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 9AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at (571)270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRADLEY J OSINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746182
ANTI-LOOSENING FIXING STRUCTURE FOR BOTTOLE BODY OF FLANGEING BOTTLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740795
INTRALUMINAL VASCULAR DEVICE, PARTICULARLY FOR SCLEROTHERAPY, AND METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734294
Infusion Unit
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734297
MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721956
PRESSURIZED NEBULIZER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.3%)
3y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1203 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month