Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/682,336

POSITIONING METHOD AND DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021111631
Examiner
DEAN, RAYMOND S
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
625 granted / 890 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
933
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
88.4%
+48.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 890 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 4, 6 – 9, 15, 31 – 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Prakash et al. (US 2021/0329584). Regarding Claim 1, Prakash teaches a positioning method, performed by a terminal, comprising: sending first indication information to an access network device, wherein the first indication information is configured to indicate at least one of: a type of the terminal, and positioning reference signaling measurement information (Section 0082, positioning reference signals (PRS), PLEASE NOTE: Section 0066 of Applicants’ specification indicate that the “at least one of” limitation can be disjunctive therefore Examiner has interpreted said limitation as disjunctive). Regarding Claim 4, Prakash teaches a positioning method, performed by an access network device, comprising: receiving first indication information from a terminal, wherein the first indication information is configured to indicate at least one of: a type of the terminal, and positioning reference signaling measurement information (Section 0082, positioning reference signals (PRS), PLEASE NOTE: Section 0066 of Applicants’ specification indicate that the “at least one of” limitation can be disjunctive therefore Examiner has interpreted said limitation as disjunctive); and sending second indication information to a core network device, wherein the second indication information is generated according to the first indication information (Section 0083, UE can assist core network entity in calculating an estimate of its position thus there will be a transmission or connection to said core network entity that enables the transmission of positioning information to said core network entity). Regarding Claim 9, Prakash teaches a positioning method, performed by a core network device, comprising: receiving second indication information from an access network device (Section 0083, UE can assist core network entity in calculating an estimate of its position thus there will be a transmission or connection to said core network entity that enables the transmission of positioning information to said core network entity), wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate at least one of the followings: a type of a terminal, and positioning reference signaling measurement information (Section 0082, positioning reference signals (PRS), PLEASE NOTE: Section 0066 of Applicants’ specification indicate that the “at least one of” limitation can be disjunctive therefore Examiner has interpreted said limitation as disjunctive). Regarding Claims 2, 15, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claims 1, 9. Prakash further teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is at least one of: a measured strength value of positioning reference signaling; a measured time difference of arrival of the positioning reference signaling; a calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling; and a calibrated time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling (Section 0082, time difference of arrival (TDOA), PLEASE NOTE: Section 0070 of Applicants’ specification indicate that the “at least one of” limitation can be disjunctive therefore Examiner has interpreted said limitation as disjunctive). Regarding Claim 3, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 2. Prakash further teaches determining the calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling by calibrating the measured strength value of the positioning reference signaling according to the type of the terminal; or determining the calibrated time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling by calibrating the time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling according to the type of the terminal (Section 0082, TDOA, UE can be different types such as mobile phone, tablet computer or smartwatch for example (Section 0040)). Regarding Claim 6, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Prakash further teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a measured time difference of arrival of positioning reference signaling (Section 0082, TDOA), and the method further comprises: determining a calibrated time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling by calibrating the measured time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling according to the type of the terminal (Section 0082, TDOA, UE can be different types such as mobile phone, tablet computer or smartwatch for example (Section 0040)); and generating the second indication information according to the calibrated time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling, wherein the second indication information comprises the calibrated time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling (Section 0082, TDOA). Regarding Claim 7, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Prakash further teaches wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate at least one of: the type of the terminal, and the positioning reference signaling measurement information (Section 0082, positioning reference signals (PRS), PLEASE NOTE: Section 0066 of Applicants’ specification indicate that the “at least one of” limitation can be disjunctive therefore Examiner has interpreted said limitation as disjunctive). Regarding Claim 8, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Prakash further teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is at least one of: a measured strength value of positioning reference signaling; a measured time difference of arrival of the positioning reference signaling; a calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling; and a calibrated time difference of the arrival of the positioning reference signaling (Section 0082, time difference of arrival (TDOA), PLEASE NOTE: Section 0070 of Applicants’ specification indicate that the “at least one of” limitation can be disjunctive therefore Examiner has interpreted said limitation as disjunctive). Regarding Claim 31, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Prakash further teaches a terminal, comprising: a processor, and a memory storing a computer program that, when executed by the processor, causes the method of claim 1 (Figure 3, Section 0066) Regarding Claim 32, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Prakash further teaches a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored therein instructions that, when executed, cause the method of claim 1 to be implemented (Figure 3, Section 0066, memory (382)). Regarding Claim 33, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Prakash further teaches an access network device, comprising: a processor, and a memory storing a computer program that, when executed by the processor, causes the method of claim 4 to be implemented (Figure 3, Section 0066). Regarding Claim 34, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 9. Prakash further teaches a core network device, comprising: a processor, and a memory storing a computer program that, when executed by the processor, causes the method of claim 9 to be implemented (Figure 1, EPC (160), 5GCN (190), serving gateways such as serving gateway (166) comprise processors and memory storing executable code run by said processors). Regarding Claim 35, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Prakash further teaches a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored therein instructions that, when executed, cause the method of claim 4 to be implemented (Figure 3, Section 0066, memory (342)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5, 13, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Prakash et al. (US 2021/0329584) in view of Zhang et al. (US 2021/0410103). Regarding Claim 5, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Prakash does not teach wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a measured strength value of positioning reference signaling, and the method further comprises: determining a calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling by calibrating the measured strength value of the positioning reference signaling according to the type of the terminal; and generating the second indication information according to the calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling, wherein the second indication information comprises the calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling. Zhang, which also teaches positioning, teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a measured strength value of positioning reference signaling (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions), and the method further comprises: determining a calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling by calibrating the measured strength value of the positioning reference signaling according to the type of the terminal (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions, UE can different types such as cellphones, smartphones, or laptops for example (Section 0039)); and generating the second indication information according to the calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling, wherein the second indication information comprises the calibrated strength value of the positioning reference signaling (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Prakash with the above features of Zhang for the purpose of improving positioning estimates as taught by Zhang. Regarding Claim 13, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 9. Prakash does not teach wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate positioning reference signaling measurement information, wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value, and the method further comprises: determining a position of the terminal according to the calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value. Zhang, which also teaches positioning, teaches wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate positioning reference signaling measurement information, wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions), and the method further comprises: determining a position of the terminal according to the calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions which enable the determination of the position). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Prakash with the above features of Zhang for the purpose of improving positioning estimates as taught by Zhang. Regarding Claim 14, Prakash combination teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 13. Prakash further teaches wherein the calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value comprises: a calibrated strength value of positioning reference signaling, or a calibrated time difference of arrival of the positioning reference signaling (Section 0082, TDOA). Claim(s) 10 – 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Prakash et al. (US 2021/0329584) in view of Zhang et al. (US 2021/0410103), as applied to Claim 9 set forth above, and further in view of Choi et al. (US 2019/0349881) Regarding Claim 10, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 9. Prakash further teaches wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate the positioning reference signaling measurement information (Section 0082, positioning reference signals (PRS)). Prakash does not teach wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate the type of the terminal and, wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a positioning reference signaling measurement value, and the method further comprises: determining a positioning algorithm according to the type of the terminal; and determining a position of the terminal by processing the positioning reference signaling measurement value with the positioning algorithm. Zhang, which also teaches positioning, teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a positioning reference signaling measurement value (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions), and the method further comprises: determining a positioning algorithm according to the type of the terminal (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions, UE can different types such as cellphones, smartphones, or laptops for example (Section 0039)); and determining a position of the terminal by processing the positioning reference signaling measurement value with the positioning algorithm (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions which enable the determination of the position). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Prakash with the above features of Zhang for the purpose of improving positioning estimates as taught by Zhang. Prakash combination does not teach wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate the type of the terminal. Choi, which also teaches positioning, teaches wherein the indication information is configured to indicate the type of the terminal (Section 0125). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Prakash combination with the above features of Choi for the purpose of providing narrowband internet of things (NB IoT) capability which provides long battery life and high connection density, which are benefits of NB IoT. Regarding Claim 11, Prakash teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 9. Prakash further teaches wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate the positioning reference signaling measurement information (Section 0082, positioning reference signals (PRS)). Prakash does not teach wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate the type of the terminal and, wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a positioning reference signaling measurement value, and the method further comprises: calibrating the positioning reference signaling measurement value according to the type of the terminal; and determining a position of the terminal according to a calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value. Zhang, which also teaches positioning, teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement information is a positioning reference signaling measurement value (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions), and the method further comprises: calibrating the positioning reference signaling measurement value according to the type of the terminal (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions, UE can different types such as cellphones, smartphones, or laptops for example (Section 0039)); and determining a position of the terminal according to a calibrated positioning reference signaling measurement value (Section 0112, signal strengths of PRS transmissions which enable the determination of the position). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Prakash with the above features of Zhang for the purpose of improving positioning estimates as taught by Zhang. Prakash combination does not teach wherein the second indication information is configured to indicate the type of the terminal. Choi, which also teaches positioning, teaches wherein the indication information is configured to indicate the type of the terminal (Section 0125). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Prakash combination with the above features of Choi for the purpose of providing narrowband internet of things (NB IoT) capability which provides long battery life and high connection density, which are benefits of NB IoT. Regarding Claim 12, Prakash combination teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 10. Prakash further teaches wherein the positioning reference signaling measurement value comprises: a measured strength value of positioning reference signaling, or a measured time difference of arrival of the positioning reference signal (Section 0082, TDOA). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND S DEAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7877. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 6:00-2:30, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached at 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND S DEAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645 Raymond S. Dean January 23, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640804
MIMO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES
4y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641400
Vehicle-To-Vehicle Communication System
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640822
CELLULAR FIELD TESTING AUTOMATION TOOL INCLUDING CARRIER AGGREGATION COMBINATION ALIGNMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630305
MONITORING SYSTEM, MONITORING SATELLITE, AND COMMUNICATION SATELLITE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627369
SATELLITE-BASED COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+15.3%)
3y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 890 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month