Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/682,342

THERMAL PROCESSING METHOD FOR IMPROVING HIGH-SPEED IMPACT RESISTANCE OF TWO-PHASE TITANIUM ALLOY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2021 — CN 202110906649.X +1 more
Examiner
WALCK, BRIAN D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Chengdu Advanced Metal Materials Industry Technology Research Institute Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
489 granted / 834 resolved
-1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
73.4%
+33.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 834 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “high-speed impact resistance” in claims 1-7 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high-speed impact resistance” is not defined by the claims, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. This renders the nature of the property being improved indefinite which renders the scope of the claims indefinite. Additionally, the terms “special bulletproof armor for special vehicles” in claim 2 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “special bulletproof armor for special vehicles” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. This renders the nature of the armor and vehicles indefinite which renders the scope of the claim indefinite. Additionally, the term “high-low temperature upsetting-drawing” in claim 2 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high-low temperature upsetting-drawing” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. This renders the nature of the temperature of the upsetting drawing indefinite which renders the scope of the claim indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Instant claims 1-7 are directed to a thermal processing method as set forth in the instant claims. The closest prior art of record is CB 112275798 A to Yang et al (an English language machine translation has been relied upon for examination purposes). Yang discloses a thermal processing method of a two-phase titanium alloy, comprising steps of: a. heating a two-phase titanium alloy slab blank, and a temperature and a heat preservation time of each section meeting the following conditions: performing heat preservation for 10-20 minutes at a temperature less than 800 °C (within the claimed range of less than 850° C) in a preheating section, performing heat preservation for 10-20 minutes at a temperature of 920-940 °C (outside the claimed range of 1050-1070° C) in a heating section, and performing heat preservation for 60-90 minutes at a temperature of 940-960 °C (outside the claimed range of 1040-1060° C) in a soaking section; b. by means of a reversing rolling mode, firstly performing transverse rough rolling on the slab blank with a rough rolling temperature of 880-920 °C (outside the instantly claimed 990-1030° C) and a reduction rate of 25-30% (overlapping the instantly claimed reduction rate of 15-25%), and then reversing the slab blank for longitudinal rolling with a rolling temperature of 750-820 °C (within the claimed range of less than 990° C) and a reduction rate of 10-20%. (Yang, para [0007-0008]) Yang differs from the instant claims at least in that heating, soaking, and rough rolling temperatures are outside of the instantly claimed ranges and Yang fails to disclose the limitation of “c. water-cooling the rolled blank to a temperature less than 200° C., and then performing solution heat treatment and aging treatment on the cooled blank.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2005/0051245 A1 to Fukai and CN 111346920 A to Zhang both disclose methods for thermal processing of titanium alloys relevant to the instant claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN D WALCK whose telephone number is (571)270-5905. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 AM - 6:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sally Merkling can be reached at 571-272-6297. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN D WALCK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1738
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668852
STEEL SHEET AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643144
RARE EARTH SINTERED MAGNET
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637744
HOT-DIP GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637743
LOW-ALLOYED MAGNESIUM ALLOY WITH HIGH DUCTILITY AND HIGH DAMPING CAPACITIES AT ROOM TEMPERATURE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630895
HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL SHEET AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
5y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+26.8%)
3y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 834 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month