Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/682,437

SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY ADHESIVE LAYER, ADHESIVE LAYER FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME, MEMBER FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY, AND NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Priority
Aug 31, 2021 — JP 2021-141961 +2 more
Examiner
RAYMOND, BRITTANY L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Zeon Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
797 granted / 1031 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1054
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.2%
+15.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1031 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6 and 9-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Annaka (U.S. Patent Publication 2020/0127263). Regarding claim 1, Annaka discloses a slurry composition for a non-aqueous battery porous membrane comprising: a binder composition that comprises a particulate polymer A and particulate polymer B; a water-soluble polymer; and a dispersion medium, wherein the particulate polymer A (acting as polymer B of present invention) has a glass-transition temperature of 20°C or lower, wherein the particulate polymer B (acting as polymer A of present invention) has a glass-transition temperature of 0 to 150 °C, and wherein the solid content of the slurry is 10-50 mass% (Paragraphs 0013, 0071, 0100, 0131, 0146, 0230 and Table 1). As to claim 2, Annaka teaches that the particulate polymer B can include a (meth)acrylic acid alkyl ester monomer unit (Paragraph 0110). Regarding claim 3, Annaka states that the particulate polymer A can be an acrylic polymer (Paragraph 0038). As to claim 6, Annaka discloses that the binder can also contain a defoamer or preservative (Paragraph 0029). Regarding claim 9, Annaka teaches that the slurry is applied to a substrate to form a film that improves adhesiveness (Paragraph 0147). As to claims 10, 11 and 13, Annaka discloses that the slurry composition is applied to a substrate using gravure coating to form an applied film for use in a non-aqueous secondary battery (Paragraphs 0147, 0158). Regarding claim 12, Annaka teaches that the substrate can be an organic separator with the slurry composition being coated on the surface of the separator (Paragraphs 0149-0150). Annaka teaches every limitation of claims 1-3, 6 and 9-13 of the present invention and thus anticipates the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Annaka (U.S. Patent Publication 2020/0127263) in view of Asai (U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0342711). The teachings of Annaka have been discussed in paragraph 3 above. Annaka fails to disclose that the water-soluble polymer includes an acid group-containing monomer unit in a proportion of not less than 5 mass% and not more than 50 mass%, and that the slurry composition has a pH of not lower than 7 and not higher than 9. Asai discloses a non-aqueous secondary battery adhesive layer comprising: organic particles, a water-soluble polymer, and a dispersion medium (Paragraphs 0029, 0032). Regarding claim 4, Asai teaches that the water-soluble polymer comprises a carboxylic acid compound in an amount of 20 to 70 mass% (Paragraphs 0081, 0086). As to claim 5, Asai discloses that the pH of the mixture is adjusted to 8 and not higher than 9 (Paragraph 0094). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the present invention that the water-soluble polymer of Annaka could contain an acid group-containing monomer unit in a proportion of 5 to 50 mass% because Asai teaches that this improves internal resistance and allows for the viscosity of the slurry to be set appropriately to improve adhesiveness. It also would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the pH of the slurry of Annaka could be between 7 and 9 because Asai teaches that this allows for the different components to react efficiently to form an adhesive layer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRITTANY L RAYMOND whose telephone number is (571)272-6545. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9 am-6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at 571-272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRITTANY L. RAYMOND Primary Examiner Art Unit 1722 /BRITTANY L RAYMOND/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749693
FUEL CELL SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744248
LITHIUM BATTERY ELECTROLYTE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744276
BATTERY CASE, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK, AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE BATTERY CASE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE BATTERY CASE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738508
HETEROELEMENT-DOPED HIGH-GRAPHITE POROUS CARBON BODY, CATALYST COMPRISING SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738524
FUEL CELL STACK HAVING CASTING MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FUEL CELL STACK
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 9m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1031 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month