Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/682,465

COLD-ROLLED STEEL SHEET, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND WELDED JOINT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Priority
Oct 13, 2021 — JP 2021-168157 +1 more
Examiner
ZHENG, LOIS L
Art Unit
1733
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
NIPPON STEEL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
504 granted / 744 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
792
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
82.6%
+42.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 744 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-4 are currently under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO2020/129402, whose English equivalent is Yoshioka et al. US 2022/0056549 (Yoshika). Yoshika teaches a cold-rolled steel sheet(abstract,[0082)] having a chemical composition that applies to the claimed chemical composition as followed: Chemical Composition Instant Claim 1 (mass%) Yoshioka (mass%) (claim 1) Table 1, Steel No. B C 0.200-0.450 0.13-0.40 0.39 Si 0.01-2.50 ≤ 1.5 0.4 Mn 0.6-3.5 ≤ 1.7 0.9 Al 0.001-0.100 ≤ 0.20 0.044 Ti 0.001-0.100 0.002-0.10 0.024 N ≤ 0.0100 ≤ 0.0025 0.0028 P ≤ 0.0400 ≤ 0.01 0.006 S ≤ 0.0100 0.0010 O ≤ 0.0060 ≤ 0.0025 0.0011 B 0-0.0100 0.0002-0.0035 0.0024 Mo 0-0.500 Nb 0-0.200 0.002-0.030 0.0012 Cr 0-2.00 V 0-0.500 Co 0-0.500 Ni 0-1.000 Cu 0-1.000 W 0-0.100 Ta 0-0.100 Sn 0-0.050 Sb 0-0.050 As 0-0.050 Mg 0-0.050 Ca 0-0.040 Y 0-0.050 Zr 0-0.050 La 0-0.050 Ce 0-0.050 Remainder Fe & Impurities Fe & impurities Fe & impurities Metallographic structure At ¼ to ¾ sheet thickness: Retained Austenite: 0-10% Martensite and/or tempered martensite: 90.0-100% Retained Austenite: 0-5% Martensite+bainite: 95-100% [0056] teaches martensite may be 100% Martensite+bainite: 100% P content at prior γ grain boundary: ≤ 10.0 mass% At ¼ to ¾ sheet thickness: ≤ 0.060 mass% 0.022 Mn content at prior γ grain boundary: ≤ 10.0 mass% Tensile Strength ≥ 1310 ≥ 1320 2075 Regarding claim 1, many of the Steel Nos. shown in Table 1 of Yoshioka have chemical compositions that read on the claimed chemical composition, as exemplified by Steel No. B, which also exhibits tensile strength that reads on the claimed tensile strength. Broader teaching of Yoshioka further discloses an embodiment wherein martensite may be present as 100%[0056]. Therefore, a cold-rolled steel sheet having a chemical composition, martensite amount and tensile strength that read on the claimed chemical composition is well withing the scope of Yoshioka’s teaching. Alternatively, since the cold-rolled steel sheet of Yoshioka has the same chemical composition, same martensite amount and tensile strength as those of claimed cold-rolled steel sheet, one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected that the cold-rolled steel sheet to have the same or significantly similar metallographic structure, including the claimed amounts of retained austenite and martensite at ¼ to ¾ sheet thickness and the claimed P and Mn contents prior γ grain boundary, absent persuasive evidence to the contrary. Regarding claim 4, Yoshioka further teaches that at least one of the steel sheets are welded , which reads on the claimed plurality of steel sheets are joined together, implying the presence of claimed welding joint. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art is Yoshioka as discussed in section 4 above. However, Yoshioka discloses a manufacturing process that, either alone or in combination, does not include the claimed breakdown process, high-temperature heat treatment process and the claimed hot rolling process using a rolling mill with four or more stands as well as their corresponding process conditions as recited in claim 2. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. WO2020/039696 teaches cold-rolled steel sheet that comprises significantly similar chemical composition as claimed and a tensile strength that reads on the claimed tensile strength, but does not teach the claimed P and Mn content at prior γ grain boundary. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LOIS L ZHENG whose telephone number is (571)272-1248. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:15-4:45. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Hendricks can be reached at 571-272-1401. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LOIS ZHENG Primary Examiner Art Unit 1733 /LOIS L ZHENG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629766
CARBON STEEL AND AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL ROLLING CLAD PLATE MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630906
HIGH CORROSION AND HEAT RESISTANT ALUMINUM ALLOY
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12584185
COLD-ROLLED STEEL SHEET HAVING EXCELLENT THERMAL-RESISTANCE AND MOLDABILITY, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12545978
ALUMINUM ALLOY AND COMPONENT PART PREPARED THEREFROM
2y 11m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539534
ALUMINUM COATED BLANK AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 1m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+12.8%)
3y 8m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 744 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month