Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/682,696

LIFTING DEVICE FOR LIFTING AND LOWERING LOADS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Examiner
WILSON, LEE D
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mohr Lizenz Verwaltungs GMBH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
1458 granted / 1824 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1858
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§102
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1824 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the term “means” . A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The following claims are vague, indefinite, awkwardly, , confusingly worded and/or lacking proper antecedent basis: “its” is recited in claim 1. The limitation must be positively recited rendering the claim indefinite and proper antecedent basis must be established.. “it” is recited in claim 9. The limitation must be positively recited rendering the claim indefinite and proper antecedent basis must be established.. “their own” is recited in claim 10. The language is narrative and use when referring to a person. This is an object and proper antecedent basis must be established. “is designed” is recited in claim 11. The term is confusing because the whole device is design and not just this part which renders the claim indefinite. The Applicant should use the term formed. Claim Interpretation This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: Lifting and pulling means in claim 1-11. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. (c) Amend the written description of the specification such that it clearly links the structure, material, or acts disclosed therein to the function recited in the claim, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)). If applicant is of the opinion that the written description of the specification already implicitly or inherently discloses the corresponding structure, material, or acts and clearly links them to the function so that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize what structure, material, or acts perform the claimed function, applicant should clarify the record by either: (a) Amending the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function and clearly links or associates the structure, material, or acts to the claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (b) Stating on the record what the corresponding structure, material, or acts, which are implicitly or inherently set forth in the written description of the specification, perform the claimed function. For more information, see 37 CFR 1.75(d) and MPEP §§ 608.01(o) and 2181. The number of Wands Factors that are met are shown below and stratify all requirements under 112 F or sixth par. (A) The breadth of the claims; Are enable (B) The nature of the invention; Is found within the art meets all requirements. (C) The state of the prior art; is common for a lifit and puller which acts upon a workpiece. (D) The level of one of ordinary skill; PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale The level of the invention renders a device which is patentable. (E) The level of predictability in the art; The Lift is common in the art but the structure and configuration is novel. (F) The amount of direction provided by the inventor; The specification provides information on how to make and use the industry Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Mohr 10737915 Mohr discloses the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown below In Bold since both are from the inventor Mohr: (currently amended) 1. heavy loads, comprising two frame assemblies (2, 3) 2 & 3 which are positioned one above the other with respect to a vertical direction, in particular are or can be oriented so as to be in parallel with one another, the lower frame assembly (2) of which is arranged suspended on the upper frame assembly (3) by lifting and pulling means (H1-H4), such that the lower frame assembly (2) can be raised on the upper frame assembly (3) by winding the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) (H1-H4 winding and traction pulls) using a raising and lowering device, and can be lowered with respect to the upper frame assembly (3) by unwinding the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4), each of the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) being deflected at least once in the extension thereof in order to stabilize the lower frame assembly (2), which can undergo excursion, with respect to the upper frame assembly (3), in at least one first lateral direction (R1) which is transverse to the vertical direction (Z), such that a diagonal portion (H1d- H4d) of each lifting and pulling means (H1-H4), which extends SO as to be inclined relative to the vertical direction (Z) as a result, intersects with such a diagonal portion (H1d-H4d) of another lifting and pulling means (H1-H4), which portion is directly adjacent and extends in a manner inclined in the opposite direction, wherein a course of each lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) in its own lifting and pulling means plane, which planes are oriented so as to be side- by-side and so as to be mutually parallel, oblique pulling means (S1-S4) S1a-S2d,, S2a-S2d which can be wound and unwound by means of a tensioning device 5 and which in each case extend in one of the oblique pulling means planes which are positioned side- by-side and so as to be mutually parallel, and in this case are oriented so as to be at right angles to the lifting and pulling means planes, extending between the two frame assemblies (2, 3), of which pulling means two directly adjacent oblique pulling means (S1-S4) in each case intersect with one another such that the lower frame assembly (2), which can undergo excursion relative to the upper frame assembly (3) in a second lateral direction (R2), in particular extending at right angles to the first lateral direction (R1), transversely to the vertical direction (Z), is also stabilized, relative to the upper frame assembly (3), with respect to said second lateral direction (R2). See Fig.1 (currently amended) LiftingThe lifting apparatus (1) according to claim 1, 2. characterized in thatwherein in each case two lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) can be deflected together, towards the lower frame assembly (2), at a deflection shaft (5a, 5b) 40 located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3). (currently amended) Lifting The lifting apparatus (1) according to either claim 1 or 3. claim 2, characterized in thatclaim 1, wherein each lifting and pulling means (H1- H4) is deflected towards the upper frame assembly (3), at a deflection means 401-404m, in particular deflection roller (6a-6d) 1000, located in the region of the lower frame assembly (2). PNG media_image2.png 698 912 media_image2.png Greyscale (currently amended) LiftingThe lifting apparatus (1) according to any of the 4. preceding claims, characterized in thatclaim 1, wherein each lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) is deflected, at a deflection means, in particular deflection roller (7a-7d) 501 & 502, located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3), towards a deflection means, in particular deflection roller (6a-6d) 1000, located in the region of the lower frame assembly (2), and from there towards a deflection shaft (5a, 5b) located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3). PNG media_image2.png 698 912 media_image2.png Greyscale ] (currently amended) LiftingThe lifting apparatus (1) according to claim 4, 5. characterized in thatwherein each lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) comprises at least one first vertical portion (H1v1, H2v1, H3v1, H4v1) which extends between the deflection means, in particular deflection roller (7a-7d), located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3) and the deflection means, in particular deflection roller (6a-6d), located in the region of the lower frame assembly (2), and at least one second vertical portion (H1v2, H2v2, H3v2, H4v2) which extends between the deflection means, in particular deflection roller (6a-6d), located in the region of the lower frame assembly (2) and the deflection shaft (5a, 5b) located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3), the two vertical portions enclosing, therebetween, an angle of from 0° to 4°. The parts are all here and the angle zero is shown. (currently amended) Lifting The lifting apparatus (1) according to any of the 6. preceding claims, characterized in thatclaim 1, wherein a free end of each lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) is fixed on the lower frame assembly (2), end portions of the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) that are opposite the free ends being coupled to a lifting shaft (4b) of the raising and lowering device (4) which can be rotated by a lifting drive (4a), and being able to be wound around said lifting shaft, at least in part, and unwound therefrom. This is how the device works. (currently amended) Lifting The lifting apparatus (1) according to any of claims 1 7. to 5, characterized in thatclaim 1, wherein a free end of each lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) is fixed on the upper frame assembly (3), end portions of the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) that are opposite the free ends being coupled to a lifting shaft (4b) of the raising and lowering device (4) which can be rotated by a lifting drive (4a), and being able to be wound around said lifting shaft, at least in part, and unwound therefrom. This is how the device works. (currently amended) Lifting The lifting apparatus (1) according to either claim 6 or 8. claim 7, characterized in thatclaim 6, wherein the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) are deflected together, towards the lifting shaft (4b) of the raising and lowering device (4) located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3), at a deflection shaft (5c) located in the region of the upper frame assembly (3). This is how the device works. (currently amended) LiftingThe lifting apparatus (1) according to any of the 9. preceding claims, characterized in thatclaim 1, wherein the tensioning device comprises at least one tensioning drive 5a-5d, which is in particular mechanically independent of a lifting drive (4a) of the raising and lowering device (4), which tensioning drive is coupled to at least one tensioning shaft, it being possible for at least two of the oblique pulling means (S1-S4) to be wound around the tensioning shaft, at least in part, and unwound therefrom. This is how the device works. (currently amended) Lifting] The lifting apparatus (1) according to claim 9, 10. characterized byfurther comprising at least two tensioning shafts, which shafts in each case at least two of the oblique pulling means (S1-S4) can be wound around, at least in part, and from which they can be unwound, the tensioning shafts being at least indirectly coupled, either to their own tensioning drive in each case, or to a common tensioning drive. This is how the device works. (currently amended) LiftingThe lifting apparatus (1) according to any of the 11. preceding claims, characterized in thatclaim 1, wherein at least one of the lifting and pulling means (H1-H4) and/or oblique pulling means (S1-S4) is designed as a strap or belt or cable or chain, or includes at least one of said embodiments, at least in part. These parts such as belt are disclosed . (31) The individual traction means, i.e. the lifting and/or oblique traction means, can all be designed so as to be different from or identical to one another. Preferably, all or at least some of the traction means can thus be a belt or band or cable. Of course, combinations thereof are also conceivable, i.e. for example constructing a single traction means from a belt and a cable. Said belt and cable may contain metal and/or plastics and/or natural fibers for example or be formed of at least one thereof. Allowable Subject Matter The claims read on the applicants old invention and the subject matter which is distinct needs to be identified which may be possible allowable. The inventions are very similar so the rejection is based upon similarity. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The 892 form disclose prior art being made of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEE D WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4499. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6;30-4;30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN KELLER can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEE D. WILSON Examiner Art Unit 3723 Ldw /LEE D WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 February 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 28, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599789
RESCUE ACCESS WEDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595849
SEAL RING INSTALLATION MODULE AND SEAL RING INSTALLATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589976
LIFTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583068
Clamping Arrangement
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564923
MOUNTING TOOL FOR POSITIONING A SHAFT SEALING RING ON A SHAFT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SHAFT SEAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month