DETAILED ACTION
Notice of AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
Priority
Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. In particular, this Application is the national stage application of an international application, which claims foreign priority to a Chinese application, filed on 13 Aug 2021.
Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement, submitted on 12 Feb 2024, is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1, 14, 16, 17, 22, 24-26, 28-32, and 34-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Abedini ‘144 (US 20210297144).
Regarding claim 1, Abedini ‘144 teaches an information determination method, the method being applied by a first communication node and comprising:
• acquiring resource transmission direction configuration information and beam indication information (Abedini ‘144, ¶¶102-104 and step 604 in figure 6 – repeater receives configuration information from the base station, where configuration information may include “indication of the forwarding direction” and a “beamforming configuration”),
• wherein the beam indication information is used for indicating a beam used by the first communication node in at least one time unit (Abedini ‘144, ¶104 – beamforming configuration includes beam directions to be used by the repeater for forwarding a signal in in a given direction over a set of resources; Abedini ‘144, ¶¶92, 97 – resource may be TDD-based time resources, such as symbols, slots, etc.); and
• determining a forwarding state of a resource according to the resource transmission direction configuration information and the beam indication information (Abedini ‘144, ¶¶102, 115, 128 (repeater determines the forwarding direction based on the indication of the forwarding direction when it is included in the configuration information and forwards the signal based on the beamforming configuration),
• wherein the forwarding state comprises at least one of downlink (DL) forwarding, uplink (UL) forwarding, or no forwarding. Abedini ‘144, ¶96 (forwarding direction includes uplink, downlink, and null).
Regarding claims 14 and 25, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a wherein for a time unit, the beam indication information comprises at least one of: a beam used on a DL resource; a beam used on an UL resource. Abedini ‘144, ¶¶104, 115 (beamforming configuration includes beam directions).
Regarding claim 16, Abedini ‘144 also teaches wherein a forwarding state of an F resource is determined in the following manner: the forwarding state of the F resource is no forwarding. Abedini ‘144, ¶¶96, 98, 114 (no forwarding on null resources).
Regarding claim 17, Abedini ‘144 teaches an information determination method, the method being applied by a second communication node and comprising:
• configuring resource transmission direction configuration information and beam indication information (Abedini ‘144, ¶¶102-104 and step 604 in figure 6 – base station transmits configuration information to the repeater, where configuration information may include “indication of the forwarding direction” and a “beamforming configuration”),
• wherein the beam indication information is used for indicating a beam used by the first communication node in at least one time unit (Abedini ‘144, ¶104 – beamforming configuration includes beam directions to be used by the repeater for forwarding a signal in in a given direction over a set of resources; Abedini ‘144, ¶¶92, 97 – resource may be TDD-based time resources, such as symbols, slots, etc.); and
• sending the resource transmission direction configuration information and the beam indication information to a first communication node (Abedini ‘144, figure 6 – in step 604, the base station transmits configuration information to repeater)
• so that the first communication node determines a forwarding state of a resource according to the resource transmission direction configuration information and the beam indication information. Abedini ‘144, ¶¶102, 115 (repeater determines the forwarding direction based on the indication of the forwarding direction when it is included in the configuration information and forwards the signal based on the beamforming configuration).
Regarding claim 22, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor (Abedini ‘144, ¶146 – apparatus 902’ may be a repeater), wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network; the memory is configured to store at least one program; and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 1. Abedini ‘144, ¶50 and figure 1 (repeater 140 is in communication with UEs 120, base stations 110, and network controller 130, which includes the core network); supra. (rejection of claim 1).
Regarding claim 23, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a non-transitory storage medium, which is configured to store a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform the information determination method of claim 1. Abedini ‘144, figure 10 (repeater 140, which may be apparatus 902’, includes a computer readable medium/memory 1008); supra. (rejection of claim 1).
Regarding claim 24, Abedini ‘144 also teaches wherein the DL forwarding refers to that the first communication node performs amplify-and-forward on data sent by a second communication node to a user equipment (UE), the UL forwarding refers to that the first communication node performs amplify-and-forward on data sent by the UE to the second communication node, and no forwarding refers to that the first communication node performs no forwarding operation. Abedini ‘144, ¶79 (gain component of repeater amplifies an input signal and outputs the amplified signal); Abedini ‘144, figure 6 and ¶87 (repeater be used to establish an access link between a base station and UE and sending uplink and downlink signals accordingly); see also Abedini ‘144, ¶¶96, 98, 114 (no forwarding on null resources).
Regarding claim 26, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor (Abedini ‘144, ¶155 – apparatus 1102’ may be a base station), wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network (Abedini ‘144, ¶50 and figure 1 (base station 110 is in communication with UEs 120, repeater 140, and network controller 130, which includes the core network); the memory is configured to store at least one program (Abedini ‘144, figure 12 – apparatus 1102’ includes a computer readable medium/memory 1208); and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 14. Supra. (see rejection of claim 14).
Regarding claim 28, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor (Abedini ‘144, ¶146 – apparatus 902’ may be a repeater), wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network (Abedini ‘144, ¶50 and figure 1 (repeater 140 is in communication with UEs 120, base station 110, and network controller 130, which includes the core network);
the memory is configured to store at least one program; and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 16. Abedini ‘144, ¶50 and figure 1 (repeater 140 is in communication with UEs 120, base stations 110, and network controller 130, which includes the core network); supra. (rejection of claim 16).
Regarding claim 29, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor (Abedini ‘144, ¶155 – apparatus 1102’ may be a base station), wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network (Abedini ‘144, ¶50 and figure 1 (base station 110 is in communication with UEs 120, repeater 140, and network controller 130, which includes the core network); the memory is configured to store at least one program (Abedini ‘144, figure 12 – apparatus 1102’ includes a computer readable medium/memory 1208); and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 17. Supra. (see rejection of claim 17).
Regarding claim 30, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor, wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network; the memory is configured to store at least one program; and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 24. Supra. (see rejections of claim 22 and 24).
Regarding claim 31, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor, wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network; the memory is configured to store at least one program; and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 25. Supra. (see rejections of claim 25 and 26).
Regarding claim 32, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a non-transitory storage medium, which is configured to store a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform the information determination method of claim 14. Abedini ‘144, figure 10 (repeater 140, which may be apparatus 902’, includes a computer readable medium/memory 1008); supra. (rejection of claim 14).
Regarding claim 34, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a non-transitory storage medium, which is configured to store a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform the information determination method of claim 16. Abedini ‘144, figure 10 (repeater 140, which may be apparatus 902’, includes a computer readable medium/memory 1008); supra. (rejection of claim 16).
Regarding claim 35, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a non-transitory storage medium, which is configured to store a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform the information determination method of claim 17. Abedini ‘144, figure 12 (apparatus 1102’, which may be a base station, includes a computer readable medium/memory 1208); supra. (see rejection of claim 17).
Regarding claim 36, Abedini ‘144 also teaches a non-transitory storage medium, which is configured to store a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform the information determination method of claim 24. Abedini ‘144, figure 10 (repeater 140, which may be apparatus 902’, includes a computer readable medium/memory 1008); supra. (see rejection of claim 24).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 15, 27, and 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abedini ‘144 (US 20210297144) in view of Liu ‘482 (US 20230262482).
Regarding claim 15, Abedini ‘144 teaches the method of claim 1, but does not explicitly teach “wherein determining the forwarding state of the resource comprises one of the following: in a case where a beam used on a DL resource in the time unit is indicated, a forwarding state of the resource is the DL forwarding; in a case where a beam used on an UL resource in the time unit is indicated, a forwarding state of the resource is the UL forwarding; or in a case where no beam is indicated for use on the resource in the time unit, a forwarding state of the resource is no forwarding.” However, Liu ‘482 teaches a relay node receiving a “first indication information” from a base station. Liu ‘482, figure 2 (s202). The first indication information indicates either a uplink or downlink access beam to be used by the relay node to forward a signal in one or more time units. Liu ‘482, ¶¶150, 152, 161; see also id. at ¶¶168-170 for no forwarding situation. At the time of the invention (pre-AIA ) or at the effective filing date of the invention (AIA ), it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to enable the repeater, taught by Abedini ‘144, to determine the forwarding direction of a time unit based on the specified beam identified in first indication information, as taught by Liu ‘482, in order to manage the beams of the relay node to improve coverage. Liu ‘482, ¶¶129, 149.
Regarding claim 27, the combination of Abedini ‘144 and Liu ‘482 also teaches a communication device, comprising a communication module, a memory, and at least one processor (Abedini ‘144, ¶146 – apparatus 902’ may be a repeater), wherein the communication module is configured to perform communication interaction between a first communication node, a second communication node, a third communication node, and a core network; the memory is configured to store at least one program; and when executed by the at least one processor, the at least one program causes the at least one processor to perform the information determination method of claim 15. Abedini ‘144, ¶50 and figure 1 (repeater 140 is in communication with UEs 120, base stations 110, and network controller 130, which includes the core network); supra. (rejection of claim 15).
Regarding claim 33, the combination of Abedini ‘144 and Liu ‘482 also teaches non-transitory storage medium, which is configured to store a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform the information determination method of claim 15. Abedini ‘144, figure 10 (repeater 140, which may be apparatus 902’, includes a computer readable medium/memory 1008); supra. (see rejection of claim 15).
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN S LAMONT whose telephone number is (571) 270-7514 and email address is benjamin.lamont@uspto.gov (see MPEP 502.03, which allows for written authorization via the USPTO electronic filing system or mail, but not via email). The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am to 3pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Vu can be reached at 571-272-3155. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Benjamin Lamont/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461