Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/683,109

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SL COMMUNICATION ON BASIS OF SL DRX COMPATIBILITY IN NR V2X

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 12, 2024
Priority
Aug 12, 2021 — provisional 63/232,620 +4 more
Examiner
BETTENDORF, SAMUEL ROBERGE
Art Unit
2414
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
15 granted / 16 resolved
+35.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
41
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
79.2%
+39.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 16 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments and Amendments Applicant’s arguments, see Remark’s page 1, filed 18 May 2026 AD, with respect to claim 1 objection has been fully considered and are persuasive. The objection has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see Remark’s, filed 18 May 2026 AD, with respect to the rejection of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have been fully considered and is persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Lohr et al. (US 20240196455 A1) or Lohr in view of Cheng et al. (US 20230040436 A1) or Cheng in further view of Freda et al. (WO 2021206952 A1) or Freda for claims 1, 2, 4-6, 9, 11-16, 18, and 19. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Lohr et al. (US 20240196455 A1) or Lohr in view of Cheng et al. (US 20230040436 A1) or Cheng in further view of Freda et al. (WO 2021206952 A1) or Freda in further view of Li et al. (US 20220287143 A1) or Li for claims 7-8. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Lohr et al. (US 20240196455 A1) or Lohr in view of Cheng et al. (US 20230040436 A1) or Cheng in further view of Freda et al. (WO 2021206952 A1) or Freda in further view of Latheef et al. (US 20230292400 A1) or Latheef for claims 3, 17, and 20. Li teaches a service ID related to a quality of service or QoS profile. However, Li fails to explicitly teach a second service ID related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support and the message for establishing a unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 4-6, 9, 11-16, 18, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lohr et al. (US 20240196455 A1) or Lohr in view of Cheng et al. (US 20230040436 A1) or Cheng in further view of Freda et al. (WO 2021206952 A1) or Freda. Claim 1 Lohr teaches, A method comprising: … …based on a service identifier (ID), monitoring, by the first device, a message for establishing a unicast connection;  (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...since expected PSID and/or ITS-AID services may be known to a receiver and mapped to a default QoS, the receiver of a potential DCR may be able to expect and monitor transmissions of certain PQIs. As may be appreciated, an ability for a receiver UE to expect and/or monitor PQIs may not be limited to unicast communication...)  receiving, by the first device from a second device, the message for establishing the unicast connection; and   (See Lohr paragraph 0039, a remote unit 102 (e.g., a second user equipment) may receive information indicating initiation of a sidelink unicast establishment procedure with a first user equipment...)  based on the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing, by the first device, the unicast cast connection with the second device,   (See Lohr paragraph 0039, the remote unit 102 may perform sidelink communication using a predetermined sidelink discontinuous reception configuration during the sidelink unicast establishment procedure.)  …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored based on a first inter-UE DRX configuration, and… (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...a common, predefined, and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used by peer UEs when establishing a unicast link between the peer UEs (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).)  Shows monitoring the unicast link based on between peer UEs or SL DRX configuration  However, Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, …obtaining, by a first device, at least one inter-user equipment (inter-UE) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration;…  …wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support, and wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,... Nevertheless, Cheng, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …obtaining, by a first device, at least one inter-user equipment (inter-UE) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration;…  (See Cheng paragraph 0064, …the Tx/Rx UE 405 and the Rx/Tx UE 410 may negotiate, via a sidelink, a configuration for sidelink DRX.) …wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support, (See Cheng paragraph 0087, if the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may not disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may assume that communications for the service type are always transmitted by a UE that supports sidelink DRX. In some aspects, if the transmission profile does not indicate that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may disable sidelink DRX.) Shows the UE enabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service and wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,... (See Cheng paragraph 0086, …the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX, in connection with a service type of interest to the receiver UE 605, based at least in part on whether the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required (e.g., which may be explicitly indicated or implicitly indicated).) Shows the UE disabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling data of the claimed invention to combine a first device monitoring for a message to establish a unicast connection, receive from a second device the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing the unicast connection between the first and second device, and monitoring for the unicast connection based on a inter-user equipment or inter-UE discontinuous reception or DRX configuration as disclosed by Lohr with the obtaining, by the first device, a inter-UE DRX configuration, a first service ID related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support and a second service ID related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support as disclosed by Cheng to increase the efficiency of the system (i.e. to reduce the amount of energy required for UEs supporting DRX). Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. Nevertheless, Freda, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. (See Freda 0137, Following a configuration failure between a first WTRU and a second WTRU, one or more of the following may occur. The first and second WTRUs may continue to operate (e.g., communicate) without DRX on a unicast link.) Shows two UEs communicating without DRX on a unicast link Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling data of the claimed invention to combine a first device monitoring for a message to establish a unicast connection, receive from a second device the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing the unicast connection between the first and second device, and monitoring for the unicast connection based on a inter-user equipment or inter-UE discontinuous reception or DRX configuration as disclosed by Lohr with monitoring the message for establishing a unicast connection without inter-UE DRX as disclosed by Freda to increase the efficiency of the system (i.e. to increase the probability of receiving the message for establishing a unicast connection). Claim 2 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein the message for establishing the unicast connection is a direct communication request message, a direct communication accept message a PC5 radio resource control (RRC) message or a PC5-signaling message. (See Lohr paragraph 0060, ...during establishment of a unicast link (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure), an initiating UE (TX UE) sends a direct communication request (“DCR”) message to initiate the unicast link (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).) The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 4 Lohr teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein the message for establishing the unicast connection includes the first service ID. (See Lohr paragraph 0061, a common, predefined, and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used for transmission and/or reception of SL-SRB0, SL-SRB1, and SL-RB2 during a unicast link establishment procedure until and including a direct communication accept (“DCA”) message is sent and/or received.) Shows a direct communication accept message utilized to establish a unicast link (See Lohr paragraph 0061, a DCA message includes QoS information (e.g., information about PC5 QoS flows requested by an initiating UE (TX UE) for each PC5 QoS flow, a PFI, corresponding PC5 QoS parameters (e.g., PQI and/or other parameters such as MFBR and/or GFBR), and/or associated V2X service types).) Shows a DCA message may include service ID of PQI The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 5 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, The method of claim 4, wherein, based on the service ID included in the message for establishing the unicast connection, the message for establishing the unicast connection is received from the second device. (See Lohr paragraph 0061, ...in response to transmission and/or reception of a DCA message, peer UEs of a unicast link may apply DRX configurations predefined and/or preconfigured for QoS flows, e.g., the QoS flows signaled within the DCA message (e.g., PQIs associated with the QoS flows—for each PQI a predefined and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used).) Shows the reception of the DCA by peer UEs The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 6 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein the first inter-UE DRX configuration is an inter-UE DRX configuration related to the first service ID. (See Lohr paragraph 0061, ...predefined SL DRX configurations may be used (e.g., derived based on PQI of established QoS-flows and/or SL RBs)...) The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 9 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, …the first iner-UE DRX configuration is selected by the first device among the at least one inter-UE DRX configuration to monitor the message for establishing the unicast connection. (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...since expected PSID and/or ITS-AID services may be known to a receiver and mapped to a default QoS, the receiver of a potential DCR may be able to expect and monitor transmissions of certain PQIs. As may be appreciated, an ability for a receiver UE to expect and/or monitor PQIs may not be limited to unicast communication...) However, Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, The method of claim 1, wherein, based on that i) the service ID is the first service ID, ii) the first service ID is related to the transmission profile representing the compatibility of inter-UE DRX support and iii) the transmission profile is related to the first inter-UE DRX configuration,… Nevertheless, Cheng, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein, based on that i) the service ID is the first service ID, ii) the first service ID is related to the transmission profile representing the compatibility of inter-UE DRX support and iii) the transmission profile is related to the first inter-UE DRX configuration,… (See Cheng paragraph 0087, if the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may not disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may assume that communications for the service type are always transmitted by a UE that supports sidelink DRX. In some aspects, if the transmission profile does not indicate that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may disable sidelink DRX.) Shows the UE enabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 11 Lohr fails to explicitly teach limitations of claim 11. Nevertheless, Cheng, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein, based on that i) the service ID is the second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to the transmission profile representing the incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… (See Cheng paragraph 0086, …the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX, in connection with a service type of interest to the receiver UE 605, based at least in part on whether the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required (e.g., which may be explicitly indicated or implicitly indicated).) Shows the UE disabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service The motivation to combine Lohr and Cheng in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Freda, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …the first device monitors the message for establishing the unicast connection in an always active state. (See Freda paragraph 0118, A DRX configuration may be provided for a unicast link. DRX may be configured (e.g., for a unicast link), for example, during link establishment/configuration signaling over PC5.) Shows a DRX configuration for unicast over PC5 or sidelink (See Freda paragraph 0118, A Tx WTRU may assume that an Rx WTRU does not perform an activity state behavior and the unicast link may still be established, for example, if an Rx WTRU rejects an activity state configuration. A Tx WTRU may implement a different activity state configuration, for example, in the case of rejection (e.g., in the case where an Rx WTRU rejects an activity state configuration). A Rx WTRU may perform (e.g., always perform) monitoring of sidelink according to a resource pool, for example, in the case when the Rx WTRU rejects an activity state configuration.) Shows monitoring a sidelink for unicast linking in an always active state The motivation to combine Lohr and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 12 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein the first inter-UE DRX configuration includes information related to an inter-UE DRX timer and information related to an inter-UE DRX cycle. (See Lohr paragraph 0054, ...each SL logical channel (“LCH”), SL service, SL application, and/or SL destination may be associated with a preconfigured and/or fixed SL-DRX-configuration (e.g., which may be defined as a combination of offset_std_On-duration, On-duration-timer, and/or periodicity).) Shows the fixed SL-DRX configuration includes a On-duration-timer and periodicity or cycle The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 13 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein the first inter-UE DRX configuration is a default inter-UE DRX configuration. (See Lohr paragraph 0065, In some embodiments, a common, predefined, and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used by peer UEs when establishing a unicast link between the peer UEs (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).) The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 14 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, A first device comprising: (See Lohr paragraph 0004, An apparatus for sidelink discontinuous reception configuration, in one embodiment, includes a first user equipment.) at least one transceiver; at least one processor; and at least one memory connected to the at least one processor and storing instructions that, based on being executed by the at least one processor, cause the first device to perform operations comprising: (See Lohr paragraph 0041, ...the processor 202 executes instructions stored in the memory 204 to perform the methods and routines described herein. The processor 202 is communicatively coupled to the memory 204, the input device 206, the display 208, the transmitter 210, and the receiver 212.) (See Lohr paragraph 0048, In one embodiment, the transmitter 210 and the receiver 212 may be part of a transceiver.) Shows the transmitter and receiver may be part of a transceiver …based on a service identifier (ID), monitoring a message for establishing a unicast connection; (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...since expected PSID and/or ITS-AID services may be known to a receiver and mapped to a default QoS, the receiver of a potential DCR may be able to expect and monitor transmissions of certain PQIs. As may be appreciated, an ability for a receiver UE to expect and/or monitor PQIs may not be limited to unicast communication...) receiving, from a second device, the message for establishing the unicast connection; and (See Lohr paragraph 0039, a remote unit 102 (e.g., a second user equipment) may receive information indicating initiation of a sidelink unicast establishment procedure with a first user equipment...) based on the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing the unicast connection with the second device,… (See Lohr paragraph 0039, the remote unit 102 may perform sidelink communication using a predetermined sidelink discontinuous reception configuration during the sidelink unicast establishment procedure.) …the message for establishing unicast connection is monitored based on a first inter-UE DRX configuration, and… (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...a common, predefined, and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used by peer UEs when establishing a unicast link between the peer UEs (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).) Shows monitoring the unicast link based on between peer UEs or SL DRX configuration However, Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, …obtaining at least one inter-user equipment (inter-UE) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration;… …wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… Nevertheless, Cheng, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …obtaining at least one inter-user equipment (inter-UE) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration;… (See Cheng paragraph 0064, …the Tx/Rx UE 405 and the Rx/Tx UE 410 may negotiate, via a sidelink, a configuration for sidelink DRX.) …wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… (See Cheng paragraph 0087, if the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may not disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may assume that communications for the service type are always transmitted by a UE that supports sidelink DRX. In some aspects, if the transmission profile does not indicate that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may disable sidelink DRX.) Shows the UE enabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… (See Cheng paragraph 0086, …the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX, in connection with a service type of interest to the receiver UE 605, based at least in part on whether the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required (e.g., which may be explicitly indicated or implicitly indicated).) Shows the UE disabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service The motivation to combine Lohr and Cheng in the independent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. However, Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. Nevertheless, Freda, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. (See Freda 0137, Following a configuration failure between a first WTRU and a second WTRU, one or more of the following may occur. The first and second WTRUs may continue to operate (e.g., communicate) without DRX on a unicast link.) Shows two UEs communicating without DRX on a unicast link The motivation to combine Lohr and Freda in the independent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 15 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, A processing device comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory connect to the at least one processor and storing instructions that, based on being executed by the at least one processor, cause a first device to perform operations comprising; (See Lohr paragraph 0041, ...the processor 202 executes instructions stored in the memory 204 to perform the methods and routines described herein. The processor 202 is communicatively coupled to the memory 204, the input device 206, the display 208, the transmitter 210, and the receiver 212.) …based on a service identifier (ID), monitoring a message for establishing a unicast connection; (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...since expected PSID and/or ITS-AID services may be known to a receiver and mapped to a default QoS, the receiver of a potential DCR may be able to expect and monitor transmissions of certain PQIs. As may be appreciated, an ability for a receiver UE to expect and/or monitor PQIs may not be limited to unicast communication...) receiving, from a second device, the message for establishing the unicast connection; (See Lohr paragraph 0039, a remote unit 102 (e.g., a second user equipment) may receive information indicating initiation of a sidelink unicast establishment procedure with a first user equipment...) based on the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing the unicast connection with the second device,… (See Lohr paragraph 0039, the remote unit 102 may perform sidelink communication using a predetermined sidelink discontinuous reception configuration during the sidelink unicast establishment procedure.) …the message for establishing the unicast is monitored based on a first inter-UE DRX configuration, and… (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...a common, predefined, and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used by peer UEs when establishing a unicast link between the peer UEs (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).) Shows monitoring the unicast link based on between peer UEs or SL DRX configuration However, Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, …obtaining at least one inter-user equipment (inter-UE) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration;… …wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… Nevertheless, Cheng, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …obtaining at least one inter-user equipment (inter-UE) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration;… (See Cheng paragraph 0064, …the Tx/Rx UE 405 and the Rx/Tx UE 410 may negotiate, via a sidelink, a configuration for sidelink DRX.) …wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a transmission profile representing compatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… (See Cheng paragraph 0087, if the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may not disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may assume that communications for the service type are always transmitted by a UE that supports sidelink DRX. In some aspects, if the transmission profile does not indicate that sidelink DRX is required, the receiver UE 605 may disable sidelink DRX.) Shows the UE enabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service wherein, based on that i) the service ID is a second service ID, and ii) the second service ID is related to a transmission profile representing incompatibility of inter-UE DRX support,… (See Cheng paragraph 0086, …the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX. For example, the receiver UE 605 may selectively disable sidelink DRX, in connection with a service type of interest to the receiver UE 605, based at least in part on whether the transmission profile indicates that sidelink DRX is required (e.g., which may be explicitly indicated or implicitly indicated).) Shows the UE disabling sidelink DRX based on the transmission profile (See Cheng paragraph 0082, …the receiver UE 605 may receive, from an application, information identifying a service type of the application, one or more quality of service (QoS) parameters associated with the application and/or the service type, a transmission (Tx) profile associated with the application and/or the service type,…) Shows the UE receiving from an application information for identifying a service type of the application and a transmission profile associated with the application or service The motivation to combine Lohr and Cheng in the independent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. However, Lohr, fails to explicitly teach, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. Nevertheless, Freda, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored without application of inter-UE DRX. (See Freda 0137, Following a configuration failure between a first WTRU and a second WTRU, one or more of the following may occur. The first and second WTRUs may continue to operate (e.g., communicate) without DRX on a unicast link.) Shows two UEs communicating without DRX on a unicast link The motivation to combine Lohr and Freda in the independent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 16 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, The first device of claim 14, wherein the message for establishing the unicast connection is a direct communication request message, a direct communication accept message, a PC5 radio resource control (RRC) message, or a PC5-signaling message. (See Lohr paragraph 0060, during establishment of a unicast link (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure), an initiating UE (TX UE) sends a direct communication request (“DCR”) message to initiate the unicast link (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).) Claim 18 Lohr teaches limitations of claim 18 as stated in claim 4. The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claim 19 Lohr teaches limitations of claim 19 as stated in claim 16. The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, and Freda in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 1. Claims 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lohr et al. (US 20240196455 A1) or Lohr in view of Cheng et al. (US 20230040436 A1) or Cheng in further view of Freda et al. (WO 2021206952 A1) or Freda in further view of Li et al. (US 20220287143 A1) or Li. Claim 7 (Currently Amended) Lohr teaches, …the message for establishing the unicast connection is monitored based on the first inter-UE DRX configuration. (See Lohr paragraph 0065, ...a common, predefined, and/or preconfigured DRX configuration may be used by peer UEs when establishing a unicast link between the peer UEs (e.g., layer-2 link establishment procedure).) Shows monitoring the unicast link based on between peer UEs or SL DRX configuration However, Lohr fails to explicitly teach, The method of claim 1, wherein, based on that i) the service ID is the first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a quality of service (QoS) profile,… Nevertheless, Li, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein, based on that i) the service ID is the first service ID, and ii) the first service ID is related to a quality of service (QoS) profile,… (See Li paragraph 0070, ...sidelink DRX is configured per QoS profile or PC5 QoS identifier (PQI) and a group or service supports only one unique QoS profile or PQI value, then the group or service may be configured with one sidelink DRX corresponding to an associated QoS profile or PQI with multiple source IDs (e.g., Tx UEs).) Shows service ID of PQI related to Qos profile supporting SL DRX Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling data of the claimed invention to combine a first device monitoring for a message to establish a unicast connection, receive from a second device the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing the unicast connection between the first and second device, and monitoring for the unicast connection based on a inter-user equipment or inter-UE discontinuous reception or DRX configuration as disclosed by Lohr with the first service ID related to a quality of service profile or QoS profile as disclosed by Li to increase the efficiency of the system (i.e. to reduce the amount of data transmitted between the two UEs). Claim 8 (Currently Amended) Lohr fails to explicitly teach limitations of claim 8. Nevertheless, Li, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, The method of claim 7, wherein the first inter-UE DRX configuration is an inter-UE DRX configuration related to the QoS profile related to the first service ID (See Li paragraph 0070, ...sidelink DRX is configured per QoS profile or PC5 QoS identifier (PQI) and a group or service supports only one unique QoS profile or PQI value, then the group or service may be configured with one sidelink DRX corresponding to an associated QoS profile or PQI with multiple source IDs (e.g., Tx UEs).) Shows service ID of PQI related to Qos profile supporting SL DRX The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, Freda, and Li in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 7. Claims 3, 17, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lohr et al. (US 20240196455 A1) or Lohr in view of Cheng et al. (US 20230040436 A1) or Cheng in further view of Freda et al. (WO 2021206952 A1) or Freda in further view of Latheef et al. (US 20230292400 A1) or Latheef. Claim 3 Lohr fails to explicitly teach limitations of claim 3. Nevertheless, Latheef, in the same field of endeavor, teaches, The method of claim 1, wherein the service ID is a service ID that the first device is interested in transmitting or receiving through the unicast connection. (See Latheef paragraph 0182, This assistance information may further indicate the index or session id for the MBS service that is desired to be received over unicast methods. In an embodiment, a UE indicates the service id or session ID which it prefers to receive in a unicast method as illustrated.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling data of the claimed invention to combine a first device monitoring for a message to establish a unicast connection, receive from a second device the message for establishing the unicast connection, establishing the unicast connection between the first and second device, and monitoring for the unicast connection based on an inter-user equipment or inter-UE discontinuous reception or DRX configuration as disclosed by Lohr with a first device interested in transmitting or receiving a service ID through a unicast connection as disclosed by Latheef to increase the efficiency of the system (i.e. to increase the accuracy of monitoring the unicast channel). Claim 17 Lohr fails to explicitly teach limitations of claim 17. Nevertheless, Latheef, in the same field of endeavor teach limitations of claim 17 as stated in claim 3. The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, Freda, and Latheef in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 3. Claim 20 Lohr fails to explicitly teach limitations of claim 17. Nevertheless, Latheef, in the same field of endeavor teach limitations of claim 17 as stated in claim 3. The motivation to combine Lohr, Cheng, Freda, and Latheef in the dependent claim consists of the same motivation as stated in claim 3. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sun et al. (US 20230217536 A1) or Sun teaches a user equipment or UE determining the discontinuous reception or DRX cycle and transmits a message to another UE during the “on” state of the DRX cycle. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new grounds of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL ROBERGE BETTENDORF whose telephone number is (571)272-4352. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri, 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edan Orgad can be reached at 571-272-7884. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL ROBERGE BETTENDORF/Examiner, Art Unit 2414 /EDAN ORGAD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2414
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695547
INDICATION INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD, AND APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12676702
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666455
INTERFERENCE ROBUST ADAPTIVE TDD CONFIGURATION WITH MULTI-TRP
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652712
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA UNDER WI-FI DIRECT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641464
Apparatus and Methods for Downlink Positioning
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 16 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month