Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/683,294

ELECTRIC MOBILE VEHICLE, PORTABLE TERMINAL DEVICE, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Examiner
WASHINGTON, ERIKA ALISE
Art Unit
2644
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
889 granted / 1000 resolved
+26.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1016
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§102
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1000 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, the wording of the last limitation of independent claim 1 is unclear. The claim recites “a notification unit that notifies temporary a user of the portable terminal device”. Appropriate correct is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Luke et al., US Patent Application Publication Number 2014/0253021 (hereinafter Luke). Regarding claim 1, Luke discloses an electric mobile vehicle [paragraph 0052] to which a power storage pack is attached, the electric mobile vehicle comprising: a controller that obtains a verification code from the power storage pack via wired or wireless communication, the verification code being to be used in a process of exchanging an encryption key that is to be used for short-range wireless communication between the power storage pack and a portable terminal device [paragraphs 0086, 0092]; and a notification unit that notifies a user of the portable terminal device of the verification code obtained from the power storage pack [paragraphs 0087, 0091]. Regarding claim 4, Luke discloses wherein when the controller obtains, from the power storage pack, a notification indicating that the process of exchanging the encryption key that is to be used for the short-range wireless communication between the power storage pack and the portable terminal device has been completed[paragraph 0092], the controller permits the electric mobile vehicle to travel [paragraph 0052]. Regarding claim 5, Luke discloses a portable terminal device comprising: a wireless communication unit configured to perform short-range wireless communication [paragraph 0086]; an obtainment unit that obtains a verification code notified from the electric mobile vehicle according to claim 1, as triggered by an operation performed by a user [paragraph 0086]; and a controller that performs a process of exchanging an encryption key with a power storage pack using the verification code, the encryption key being used for the short-range wireless communication with the power storage pack [paragraphs 0091-0092], the power storage pack being attached to the electric mobile vehicle [paragraph 0052]. Regarding claim 9, Luke discloses a non-transitory machine-readable recording medium that stores a wireless communication program that causes a computer to execute the processes of: obtaining a verification code notified from the electric mobile vehicle according to claim 1, as triggered by an operation performed by a user [paragraph 0086]; and performing a process of exchanging an encryption key with a power storage pack using the verification code, the encryption key being used for short-range wireless communication with the power storage pack [paragraphs 0091-0002], the power storage pack being attached to the electric mobile vehicle [paragraph 0052]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luke. Regarding claim 2, Luke does not specifically disclose wherein the notification unit includes a display unit configured to display the verification code. However, the Examiner takes Official Notice that including a display unit is well known in the art. Before the effective filing date it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Luke to include this feature. The motivation for this modification would have been to combine prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 6-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Luke et al., CN 103843225., disclose security and control of a power storage device based on a user profile for authentication. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIKA WASHINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-7841. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 571-270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EAW/ March 3, 2026 /ERIKA A WASHINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598231
Mobile Offloading for Disconnected Terminal Operation
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597334
ALARM SYSTEM DETECTOR GEOFENCING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587813
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ASSET TRACKING, ASSET GROUPING, AND ERROR RECOVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574188
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISABLING HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST IN INTERNET OF THINGS-NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574998
Multi-Consecutive Slots Transmission with Sidelink Discontinuous Reception
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1000 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month