Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/683,298

ADHESIVE RESIN COMPOSITION AND FILM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Priority
Aug 18, 2021 — JP 2021-133540 +1 more
Examiner
STANLEY, JANE L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
560 granted / 958 resolved
-1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1002
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 958 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the recitation of a melt flow rate is indefinite as it is not made clear if this is a property of the adhesive resin composition as a whole or a recitation of copolymer (B) only. This includes claims 2-7 as they depend from claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hoya (US PGPub 2010/0056691). Regarding claim 1, Hoya teaches polypropylene resin compositions (G’) comprising a combination of 99 to 14 parts by weight of a soft propylene copolymer (B) and 1 to 86 parts of a graft modified polymer (F) ([0031]; [0634]; claims). Hoya teaches the graft modified polymer (F) is an ethylene/ɑ-olefin copolymer ([0597]) which has been graft modified with a vinyl compounds, preferably an unsaturated carboxylic acid or anhydride ([0606]-[0610]), preferably maleic acid anhydride ([0611]; [0659]). Hoya further teaches the content of the vinyl compound is 0.01 to 10 wt% of the graft modified polymer ([0622]) and teaches the base copolymer has a melt flow rate (MFR, 190ºC, 2,16 kg load) of 0.1 to 20 g/10in ([0601]). Hoya teaches the soft propylene copolymer (B) is a copolymer of 55 to 90 mol% of propylene structural units and 10 to 45 mol% of structural units derived from at least one C2-C20 ɑ-olefin, excluding propylene ([0263]-[0266]; [0278]). Hoya further teaches the soft propylene copolymer (B) has a melt flow rate (MFR, 190ºC, 2,16 kg load) of 0.01 to 100 g/10min ([0264]), preferably 0.01 to 30 ([0268]). Regarding the preamble recitation of ‘an adhesive’: i) it is noted that the preamble of the claim(s) is not considered a limitation and is of no significance to claim construction (see Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 182 F.3d 1298, 1305, 51 USPQ2d 1161, 1165 (Fed. Cir. 1999); and MPEP § 2111.02); and ii) a chemical composition and its properties are inseparable (see MPEP 2112.01)). Regarding claim 2, Hoya teaches the resin composition as set forth above and, as noted, teaches the melt flow rate (MFR, 190ºC, 2,16 kg load) of the graft modified polymer (F) of 0.1 to 20 g/10in ([0601]). Regarding claims 3-4, Hoya teaches the resin composition as set forth above and, as noted, teaches and exemplifies the vinyl grafting compound as maleic anhydride ([0611]; [0659]) and teaches the amount of the vinyl grafting compound is from 0.01 to 10 wt% of the graft modified polymer ([0622]). Regarding claims 5-7, Hoya teaches the resin composition as set forth above and teaches the compositions are suitable for forming shaped articles including multilayer materials ([0635]-[0638]). The recitation that the basic formulation containing said resin composition in the form of a multilayer article is to be a packaging film for batteries (claim 6) or an electrode sealing material for lithium ion batteries (claim 7) does not confer patentability to the claims since the recitation of an intended use does not impart patentability to otherwise old compounds or compositions (see In re Tuominen, 671 F.2d 1359, 213 USPQ 89 (CCPA 1982); see In re Schreiber, 44 USPQ 2d 1429, (Fed. Cir. 1997)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-7 are alternatively rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hoya (US PGPub 2010/0056691) in view of Iwashita et al. (US PGPub 2019/0300688). Hoya teaches the resin compositions as set forth in claims 1 and 5 above and teaches multilayer films. Hoya is silent as to the end uses of packaging film for batteries (claim 6) or electrode sealing material for lithium ion batteries (claim 7). However, Iwashita teaches polypropylene resin compositions comprising a combination of polypropylenes (abstract), soft polypropylene ([0187]) and graft modified ethylene copolymers ([0257]-[0259]; [0276]) and teaches known and suitable end uses of such polymer compositions is monolayer or multilayer films which may be utilized as packaging films for lithium ion batteries ([0284]-[0285]). Iwashita and Hoya are analogous art and are combinable because they are concerned with the same field of endeavor, namely propylene resin compositions comprising substantially similar soft polypropylene and graft modified ethylene copolymer components suitable for multilayer materials. At the time of filing a person having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to for packaging film materials for lithium ion batteries as taught by Iwashita using the compositions of Hoya and would have been motivated to do so as Iwashita teaches such is a known and suitable end use for such compositions. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANE L STANLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-3870. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM to 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at 571-272-1197. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANE L STANLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1767
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679976
NOVEL TRIBOELECTRIC NANOGENERATOR
5y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681222
SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE COMPLEX, SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE COMPLEX DISPERSION LIQUID, SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE COMPLEX COMPOSITION, AND SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE COMPLEX CURED FILM
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680010
COMPOSITE MATERIAL
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680008
COOLANT COMPOSITION
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662612
METHOD FOR FILTERING POLISHING ADDITIVE-CONTAINING LIQUID, POLISHING ADDITIVE-CONTAINING LIQUID, POLISHING COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR PRODUCING POLISHING COMPOSITION, AND FILTER
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+29.9%)
3y 0m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 958 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month