Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/683,439

TERMINAL AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Examiner
HOLLAND, JENEE LAUREN
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT Docomo Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
570 granted / 685 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.6%
+20.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 685 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. Claims 6-12 are pending. Claims 1-5 are cancelled. Priority 2. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The Information Disclosure Statements dated 02/13/2024 and 02/14/2025 are acknowledged by the Examiner. Specification 4. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claim(s) 6-7 and 9-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being disclosed by Park et al, US 2023/0105294 hereafter Park. As for claim 6, Park discloses: A terminal (Park, Fig. 16, [0288]-[0290], the terminal may include a processor 1601, a transceiver 1602, and a memory 1603) comprising: a transmitter that transmits capability information of the terminal, the capability information relating to support of simultaneous transmission of multiple uplink (UL) transmissions with different priorities (Park, [0179]-[0178], Transmit/report the UE capability for simultaneous PUCCH and PUSCH transmission having different priorities); and a processor that, when the multiple UL transmissions overlap in a time domain (Park, [0178]-[0179], a UL control channel and a data channel having different priorities from each other overlap in one cell in terms of time resources), controls, based on a given condition, to perform simultaneous transmission (Park, [0269] In operation 1407, the terminal may determine one UL control channel and one UL data channel to be transmitted, based on a result of determining whether to perform the simultaneous transmission and a result of the identifying) without performing multiplexing of the multiple UL transmissions (Park, [0274], the terminal may transmit the UL control channel and the UL data channel without multiplexing. [0225], [0227], the terminal may simultaneously transmit the PUCCH and the PUSCH without multiplexing.) As for claim 7, Park discloses the given condition is whether simultaneous transmission of the multiple UL transmissions is applied or not (Park, [0269] In operation 1407, the terminal may determine one UL control channel and one UL data channel to be transmitted, based on a result of determining whether to perform the simultaneous transmission and a result of the identifying). As for claim 9, Park discloses the multiple UL transmissions are a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (Park, [0179]-[0178], the UE capability for simultaneous PUCCH and PUSCH transmission in one cell). As for claim 10, this claim is analyzed and rejected for the same reasons as claim 6 because the corresponding the apparatus of claim 6 can be used to practice the method of claim 10. As for claim 11, Park discloses: A base station (Park, Fig. 17, [0297], the base station may include a processor 1701, a transceiver 1702, and a memory 1703 )comprising: a receiver that receives capability information of a terminal, the capability information relating to support of simultaneous transmission of multiple uplink (UL) transmissions with different priorities (Park, [0179]-[0178], Receive from the UE the capability information for simultaneous PUCCH and PUSCH transmission having different priorities);; and a processor that, when the multiple UL transmissions overlap in a time domain (Park, [0178]-[0179], a UL control channel and a data channel having different priorities from each other overlap in one cell in terms of time resources), controls, based on a given condition, reception processing for the multiple UL transmissions that are simultaneously transmitted, (Park, [0269], one UL control channel and one UL data channel to be received/transmitted, based on a result of determining whether to perform the simultaneous transmission and a result of the identifying) without performing multiplexing of the multiple UL transmission (Park, [0274], [0287], the base station receives, from the terminal, the UL control channel and the UL data channel without multiplexing. [0225], [0227], the terminal may simultaneously transmit the PUCCH and the PUSCH without multiplexing.) As for claim 12, this claim is analyzed and rejected for the same reasons as claims 6 and 11 because the corresponding the apparatuses of claims 6 and 11 can be used to practice the system of claim 12. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENEE HOLLAND whose telephone number is (571)270-7196. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, IAN MOORE can be reached at (571)272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JENEE HOLLAND Examiner Art Unit 2469 /JENEE HOLLAND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604358
NETWORK-AIDED MULTI-LINK OPERATION FOR SINGLE-RADIO DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598526
Method And Apparatus For Cell Reselection For Network Energy Saving In Mobile Communications
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587828
MANAGING MULTIPLE SUBSCRIBER IDENTITIES IN CELLULAR NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587973
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REPORTING POWER-RELATED INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587984
METHOD FOR SMALL DATA TRANSMISSION IN RRC_INACTIVE STATE AND RELATED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+7.8%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 685 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month