Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/684,482

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING POWER

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Examiner
LUKS, JEREMY AUSTIN
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
846 granted / 1149 resolved
+5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1186
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1149 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Principally, the claims are directed toward a perpetual motion machine in that claims 1 and 2 require “wherein the chamber arrangement enclosure is configured to store antimatter therein using magnetic and/or electrostatic fields; wherein the antimatter in the chamber arrangement enclosure is configured to cause rotation of the flywheel assembly, said rotation providing a driving force to the flywheel assembly for generation of power via a turbine connected thereto; wherein a weight of the matter in the flywheel assembly corresponds to a negative weight of the antimatter in the chamber arrangement enclosure.” Additionally, Applicant’s disclosure states that “no external supply of energy is provided to the flywheel assembly for maintaining its rotation (Specification, Page 4, Line 31-Page 5, Line 1).” The principle of the claimed system implies also that no antimatter is consumed, since it is trapped in the ring- shaped chamber. The antimatter can therefore also not be seen as a source of energy. In other words, the system generates mechanical energy out of nothing. This is contrary to the law of conservation of energy and to the first law of thermodynamics. Applicant states also that "modern physics research has identified that a force of gravitational attraction between two positive masses; however, when one of the two positive masses is replaced by a corresponding antimatter mass, the antimatter mass experiences a repulsion between matter and antimatter," and that "the strength of this repulsive gravitational force has been found to be much stronger than Newtonian gravity" (Specification, Page 4, Line 18-27). Experimental evidence does not support that there is any gravitational difference between matter and antimatter (see Matter and antimatter respond to gravity in the same way, study finds). Since no difference in gravity exists, there is no repulsive force provided by simply having a mass of antimatter. Since there is no difference in gravity, the system does not provide repulsion/rotation of the flywheel, and the calculations found in the specification for the amount of antimatter required are not correct. Both matter and antimatter have the same mass (see page 6 of NASA Antimatter Propulsion) therefore antimatter cannot have negative mass as described in the specification and utilized as the basis for calculations. Further, in opposition to the disclosure, mainstream physics current understanding is that matter and antimatter interact with gravity in the same way (see Johnston “Antimatter and matter respond to gravity in the same way, experiment reveals”) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the disclosed invention is inoperative and therefore lacks utility. As set forth above, matter and antimatter have the same mass and gravity and therefore, the basis for the theoretical calculations critical to the operability of the claimed invention do not work. Therefore, the invention is inoperative and lacks utility. There is no experimental evidence to support the claimed invention of massless propulsion utilizing the theoretical differences in the mass and gravity of matter and antimatter. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention lacks patentable utility. Since the claimed invention is inoperative, the invention also lacks patentable utility. The invention has no other purpose than power generation. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEREMY AUSTIN LUKS whose telephone number is (571)272-2707. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9:00-5:00). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at (571) 270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEREMY A LUKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597408
SOUND ABSORBING DEVICES FOR PANELS WITH OPENINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587048
ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583284
VENTILATION DEVICE FOR A VENTILATION, HEATING AND/OR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571603
SILENCER FOR MULTI BARREL WEAPON SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559249
ENGINE EXHAUST CENTER BODY WITH ACOUSTIC ATTENUATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1149 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month