Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/684,572

Predetermined Breaking Body for a Shaft of a Machine, Shaft Having a Predetermined Breaking Body, and Machine Having a Shaft of This Type

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Examiner
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1456 granted / 1798 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1839
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1798 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Drawings The drawings are objected to because at Fig. 5 reference character 25 fails to indicate a reinforcing element. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Blandford, US 4,447,217. Blandford discloses a predetermined breaking body (10) of a shaft (col. 2, lines 37 & 42) of a machine (col. 1, line 7), comprising: a first sub-body (11); a second sub-body (12); and a predetermined breaking element (60, 43), wherein the first and second sub-bodies are connected to one another, so as to conjointly rotate, along a longitudinal center axis of the predetermined breaking body via the predetermined breaking element (see Figs. 1-2), the predetermined breaking element is anisotropic, such that during transmission of a torque between the sub-bodies, the predetermined breaking element yields in a first torsion direction under a first predetermined ultimate torsional moment (col. 4, lines 33-36) and yields in a second torsion direction opposed to the first torsion direction under a second predetermined ultimate torsional moment (col. 4, lines 28-32), and the predetermined ultimate torsional moments differ in size (col. 4, lines 28-36). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Dinitz discloses a metallic predetermined breaking body (10) comprising a predetermined breaking element with material recess (24, 26). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Greg Binda whose telephone number is (571)272-7077. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 et. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Greg Binda/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577977
INTEGRATED COMPOSITE DRIVE SHAFTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571431
FLEXIBLE METALLIC COUPLINGS FOR DRIVE SHAFTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571432
UNIVERSAL JOINT ASSEMBLY FOR SURGICAL TOOLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560205
CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT AND DRIVESHAFT INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553493
DAMPER APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1798 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month