Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/684,694

MINI SLOTTED RANDOM ACCESS PROTOCOL WITH AN AGE THRESHOLD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Priority
Aug 17, 2021 — TÜ 2021/013006 +1 more
Examiner
ZUNIGA ABAD, JACKIE
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
561 granted / 735 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
80.4%
+40.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 735 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim 1 is presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/20/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were received on 02/19/2024. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mutlu et al., (hereinafter Mutlu), NPL “MiSTA: Threshold-ALOHA with Mini Slots”, in view of Yang et al., (hereinafter Yang), NPL “Understanding Age of Information in Large-Scale Wireless Networks”. As per claim 1, Mutlu discloses an operation method of the mini slotted random access protocol with an age threshold [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, Introduction, page 6, col. 2, lines 14-19, an operation method of the mini slotted random access protocol with an age threshold (methodology defined; the Age of Information (AoI) metric has been studied under many network and service models, including random access channels; study a modification of the Threshold ALOHA policy that we refer to as Mini Slotted Threshold ALOHA (MiSTA))], comprising: i. updating, by the users, their age of information, and controlling whether their age exceeds the age threshold or not [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 2, col. 1, System Model, updating, by the users, their age of information, and controlling whether their age exceeds the age threshold or not (mechanism the sources are able to keep track of their ages; Age of Information (AoI) of source; Sources with an age equal to or greater than Γ are said to be active)], ii. if the age of the users is smaller than the age threshold, being inactive during the rest of slots [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, if the age of the users is smaller than the age threshold, being inactive during the rest of slots (sources with age below a predetermined threshold Γ abstain from data transmission; sources with age of information (AoI) below a certain threshold Γ are inactive)], iii. If the age of the users reaches the age threshold, creating a new packet [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 2, col. 1, System Model, page 6, col. 2, Conclusion, If the age of the users reaches the age threshold, creating a new packet (sources with an age equal to or greater than Γ are said to be active, and attempt transmission with probability τ in each slot; sources generate a new packet)], iv. probability TO for users who are active in the first mini slot, and sending a packet in a link layer indicating that they want to use the slot by the users is successful with probability TO [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, page 2, col. 2, Mini Slotted Threshold ALOHA, probability TO for users who are active in the first mini slot, and sending a packet in a link layer indicating that they want to use the slot by the users is successful with probability TO (a mini slot during which active sources test the channel with a certain probability, τ1)], v. abandoning usage of this slot and data slot in it, and waiting as inactive until the next slot by the users fails with probability 1- T0 [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 5, col. 1, abandoning usage of this slot and data slot in it, and waiting as inactive until the next slot by the users fails with probability 1- T0 (Threshold ALOHA (TA), sources with age below a predetermined threshold Γ abstain from data transmission; sources with age of information (AoI) below a certain threshold Γ are inactive)], vi. sending, by the access point, to that user feedback indicating that it can use the slot if a packet at the link layer is sent from a single user [page 2, col. 1, col. 2, System Model, sending, by the access point, to that user feedback indicating that it can use the slot if a packet at the link layer is sent from a single user (a success feedback mechanism in the system such that the AP sends an acknowledgement to a source that successfully made a transmission in that slot)], vii. providing, by the access point, feedback to the users in the channel indicating whether multiple packets are sent from more than one user in this way [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 2, col. 1, System Model, providing, by the access point, feedback to the users in the channel indicating whether multiple packets are sent from more than one user in this way (1-bit feedback per successful transmission, sources can keep track of their ages, and make transmission decisions that are not oblivious of age)], viii. carrying out trial in the second mini slot for users who have not become inactive [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, page 2, col. 2, Mini Slotted Threshold ALOHA, page 5, carrying out trial in the second mini slot for users who have not become inactive (using Mista, attempt probabilities of the active sources during the mini slot and the data slot, MiSTA can be further advanced by increasing the number of mini slots in a time slot)], ix. repeating the flow as stated in the iv., and described in the first mini slot until not more than one user remains active in this mini slot and the subsequent mini slots, or until all mini slots have passed [fig. 1, page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 2, col. 2, Mini Slotted Threshold ALOHA, page 5, col. 2, Extension: Multiple Mini Slotted Threshold ALOHA, (the active sources during the mini slot)], x. probability TW by the users if there are users still active in the data slot [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 3, col. 1, page 4, col. 1, page 5, col. 1, probability TW by the users if there are users still active in the data slot (probabilities of the active sources during the mini slot and the data slot)], xi. at the end of the data slot, broadcasting, by the access point, feedback indicating whether it has been a successful packet transfer or not [page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 2, col. 1, System Model, page 2, col. 2, Mini Slotted Threshold ALOHA, at the end of the data slot, broadcasting, by the access point, feedback indicating whether it has been a successful packet transfer or not (feedback per successful transmission, sources can keep track of their ages, and make transmission decisions)], and xii. updating, by the users, their age of information accordingly, and passing to the next slot [fig. 3, page 1, col. 1, Abstract, col. 2, Introduction, page 2, col. 1, System Model, page 4, col. 2, (the age increases by 1 at the next slot; sources can keep track of their ages, and make transmission decisions)]. Mutlu does not explicitly disclose carrying out a Bernoulli trial. However, Yang teaches carrying out a Bernoulli trial [table 1, page 1, col. 1, Abstract, page 2, col. 1, page 3, col. 1, page 9, col. 1, Simulation and Numerical Results, carrying out a Bernoulli trial (packets of each node are updated according to independent Bernoulli processes)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the method described in Mutlu by including carrying out a Bernoulli trial as taught by Yang because it would provide the Mutlu's method with the enhanced capability of achieving timely updating by minimizing AoI [Yang, page 1, col. 1, col. 2, Introduction]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Feng et al., U.S. Publication No. 2017/0251382 discloses each node transmits a frame in a slot with probability. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACKIE ZUNIGA ABAD whose telephone number is (571)270-7194. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, IAN MOORE can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACKIE ZUNIGA ABAD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640875
CELL-SPECIFIC REFERENCE SIGNAL FOR TRACKING LOOP UPDATE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634002
MULTIPOINT TRANSMISSION FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORKS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627999
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627399
BLIND DETECTION METHOD, DEVICE, TERMINAL AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621901
METHOD FOR DETERMINING EXTENDED DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION PARAMETER, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.8%)
3y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 735 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month