Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/684,811

ACTUATOR AND MACHINE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Examiner
GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fanuc Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
871 granted / 1148 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1182
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1148 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 01/20/2006 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, seepages 4-7, filed 01/27/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-13 under 102 and 103 respectively have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Petersen (US PG Pub 2006/0261690). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 8-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao (CN 211940993) in view of Petersen (US PG Pub 2006/0261690). As to independent claim 1, Zhao teaches an actuator (see figure 1) comprising: a motor (6, 18); a container (5) that contains the motor (6, 18); a detection unit (10) configured to detect operation of the motor (6,18) ; and a fixing unit (the encoder assembly shell is provided with the incremental photoelectric rotary encoder and the absolute photoelectric encoder; the encoder assembly shell is installed on the encoder assembly bracket; the coder component bracket is fixedly connected with the right end of the motor shell through multiple bolts, see paragraph [0008]) that fixes, on an outer side in a radial direction of the detection unit (10), an end surface of the container 5) on an opposite side to an output side of the motor (6, 18) to a housing of a machine (through the speed reducer shell (2), see paragraph [0020]) as shown in figure 1. However Zhao teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except wherein the detection unit is fixed, directly or via a braking unit, to the end surface of the container. Petersen teaches the detection unit (58, 80) is fixed, directly or via a braking unit, to the end surface of the container (12, 134) as shown in figures 3 and 5, for the advantageous benefit of improving the efficiency of the motor and design flexibility of the motor. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Zhao by using the detection unit is fixed, directly or via a braking unit, to the end surface of the container, as taught by Petersen, to improve the efficiency of the motor and design flexibility of the motor. As to claim 4/1, Zhao teaches wherein the container (2) is fitted into a cylindrical portion of the housing (through the speed reducer shell (2), see paragraph [0020]) as shown in figure 1 . As to claim 5/1, Zhao teaches wherein the container (2) is in metallic contact with a cylindrical portion of the housing(through the speed reducer shell (2), see paragraph [0020]) as shown in figure 1 . As to claim 8/1, Zhao teaches wherein the container (5) is exposed to outside air as shown in figure 1. As to claim 9/1, Zhao teaches further comprising a fixing unit (see figure 1)that fixes a reducer (19) to an end surface of the container (5) on an output side of the motor as shown in figure 1. As to claim 10/1, Zhao teaches machine comprising the actuator as shown in figure 1. As to claim 11/10, Zhao teaches wherein the actuator is fixed to an outer surface of the housing (through the speed reducer shell (2), see paragraph [0020]) as shown in figure 1. As to claim 12/10, Zhao teaches wherein the actuator is fitted into a cylindrical portion of the housing (through the speed reducer shell (2), see paragraph [0020]) as shown in figure 1. As to claim 13/1, Zhao teaches wherein the machine includes a robot (see title). Claim(s) 2-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao (CN 211940993) and Petersen (US PG Pub 2006/0261690) as applied in claim 1 above, and further in view of Tanaka (JP10174368). As to claim 2/1, Zhao in view of Petersen teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except wherein the container includes an inner side cylindrical body that contains the motor, an outer side cylindrical body that surrounds the inner side cylindrical body with a cavity interposed between the inner side cylindrical body and the outer side cylindrical body, and a plurality of ribs that connect the inner side cylindrical body and the outer side cylindrical body. However Tanaka teaches the container (1) includes an inner side cylindrical body (1a) that contains the motor, an outer side cylindrical body (3) that surrounds the inner side cylindrical body (1a) with a cavity interposed between the inner side cylindrical body (1a) and the outer side cylindrical body (3), and a plurality of ribs (4) that connect the inner side cylindrical body (1a) and the outer side cylindrical body (3) as shown in figure 1, for the advantageous benefit of improving cooling of electric machine and rigidity of ventilation cover. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Zhao in view of Petersen by using the container includes an inner side cylindrical body that contains the motor, an outer side cylindrical body that surrounds the inner side cylindrical body with a cavity interposed between the inner side cylindrical body and the outer side cylindrical body, and a plurality of ribs that connect the inner side cylindrical body and the outer side cylindrical body, as taught by Tanaka, to improve cooling of electric machine and rigidity of ventilation cover. As to claim 3/2, Zhao and Petersen in view of Tanaka teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except wherein the plurality of ribs form a truss structure in a circumferential direction about an axis of the actuator. However Tanaka teaches the plurality of ribs (4) form a truss structure in a circumferential direction about an axis of the actuator as shown in figure 1, for the advantageous benefit of improving cooling of electric machine and rigidity of ventilation cover. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Zhao in view of Tanaka by using the plurality of ribs form a truss structure in a circumferential direction about an axis of the actuator, as taught by Tanaka, to improve cooling of electric machine and rigidity of ventilation cover. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao (CN 211940993) and Petersen (US PG Pub 2006/0261690) as applied in claim 1 above, and further in view of Qu (CN102810943). As to claim 6/1, Zhao in view of Petersen teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except further comprising a thermal conductive material with which a gap between the container and cylindrical portion of the housing is filled. However Qu teaches a thermal conductive material (14) with which a gap between the container (1) and cylindrical portion of the housing (9) is filled as shown in figure 1, for the advantageous benefit of improving the performance of the motor. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Zhao in view of Petersen by using a thermal conductive material with which a gap between the container and cylindrical portion of the housing is filled, as taught by Qu, to improve the performance of the motor. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7850. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:30-2:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, OLUSEYE IWARERE can be reached at (571)270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834 February 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 27, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592595
ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH AXIAL AND RADIAL PERMANENT MAGNETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592601
MOTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587068
ELECTRIC MOTOR COOLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583593
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OIL MAINTENANCE IN GEARBOXES FOR eVTOL AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580434
ROTOR FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ROTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1148 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month