Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/684,856

CAMPTOTHECIN COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 01, 2021 — CN 202111020912.1 +1 more
Examiner
DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE
Art Unit
1622
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Shanghai Best-Link Bioscience LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
0%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
0%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 1 resolved
-60.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
40
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority The present application claims priority to the applications, CN 202111020912.1 and PCT/CN2022/116085, with the effective filing dates of 1 Sept 2021 and 31 Aug 2022, respectively. Claim Status This Office Action is in response to Applicant’s Response to Restriction Requirement filed, 1 June 2026. Applicant’s election with traverse of Group I and Compound 1: PNG media_image1.png 124 209 media_image1.png Greyscale in the reply filed 1 June 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that because the claimed subject matter of Groups I-V are sufficiently related such that an undue burden would not be presented to the Examiner and that claims 1-18 and 21-22 fall within the recitation of 37 CFR 1.475(b)(3). Applicant further submits that the claimed compounds of claim 1 are different from the prior art (Chari (WO 2020/219287, filed 9 Jul 2020; of record, see PTO-892 mailed 13 Apr 2026) and Masuda (US 10,195,288, issued 5 Feb 2019; of record, see PTO-892 mailed 13 Apr 2026) and that R7 of the R5 group of claim 1 exhibits proliferation inhibitory activity against at least one MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-435s cells that are superior to that of Compound 6a (Chari). However, this is not found persuasive. The Examiner notes that the application is a National Phase (371) application, and thus Applicant applies a different standard to traverse the restriction requirement, which is irrelevant to National Phase (371) applications. In regard to Applicant’s assertion that the compounds of claim 1 exhibit superior activity than Compound 6a of Chari (Table 4 of the specification, [1084]; Tables 1-4), Compound 1 does not exhibit an unexpected effect over Terasawa (U.S. Patent No. 5,834,476, issued 10 Nov 1998) in view of Li (ACS Med. Chem. Lett.¸2019, 10, 1386-1392) and Schonherr (ACIE, 2013, 52, 12256-12267). Terasawa teaches derivatives of camptothecin that are water-soluble with excellent antitumor activity and a high degree of safety: PNG media_image2.png 185 221 media_image2.png Greyscale (abstract). Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47). Terasawa fails to teach a compound of Formula (I). Li teaches camptothecin derivatives and antibody-drug conjugates and structure-activity relationships (SAR) therein (abstract; Figure 1, page 1836; page 1387, column 1, paragraphs 1-3; page 1387, paragraph 1). Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives bind to topisomerase I/DNA complex to prevent reannealing, which can cause cell death due to partially cleaved DNA (page 1386, column 1, paragraph 2). Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives have at least five rings (A-E) and that the E-ring is in equilibrium between the closed and open forms: PNG media_image4.png 163 329 media_image4.png Greyscale (page 1386, column 1, paragraph 2; page 1386, Figure 1). Li teaches that the E-ring when open is reported to be far less active, because it’s charge inhibits diffusion into cells and >99% of it is bound by human serum albumin in plasma (page 1386, column 2, paragraph 1). Li teaches that the fluorine substituent on the A ring at the C11 position typically increase cytotoxicity several fold and that the selectivity at C20, must be in the (S) configuration ((9S) in Terasawa; page 1386, column 2, paragraph 1; page 1387, column 2, paragraph 1). Li teaches that exatecan bears an additional F ring (“F-ring”) and was found to be less prone to hydrolysis in human plasma (~30% remaining in the E-ring) and attributed the lactone stability to the C11 fluorine and F-ring (page 1387, column 1, paragraph 1). Li teaches that the F-ring is not required for E-ring stabilization and that the F-ring complicates synthetic efforts and SAR studies (page 1387, column 1, paragraph 3; page 1387, column 2, paragraph 1; page 1391, column 1, paragraph 2). Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387). Additionally, Li teaches that more hydrophobic analogs had higher potencies against the two cancer cell lines tested (page 1389, column 2, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches the phenomenon characterized in medicinal chemistry as the magic methyl effect on potency (abstract). Schonherr teaches that the methyl group is one of the most prevalent functionalities in biologically active molecules, which are commonly installed to improve a molecule’s biological activity and physical properties (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 1). Schonherr teaches that methylation is used to optimize many properties of a drug candidate, such as methylating next to a metabolic hot spot to sterically block metabolism and lengthen half-life (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1). Schonherr teaches the improvements in binding affinity observed upon introducing a methyl group have been attributed to desolvation effects (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches that methylation energetically favors binding and lowers the IC50 value (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches that estimates place the value for ΔΔG_transfer upon a proton for methyl replacement at about 0.8 kcal/mol for transfer from water to a protein and that this corresponds to an approximate 3.5-fold boost in potency from methylation based on ΔΔG_transfer alone (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2). However, Schonherr teaches that the effect may even be greater in that a single methyl group may boost potency approximately 10-fold if the new methyl group sits nicely in a hydrophobic pocket of the active site (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2; page 12258, column 1, paragraph 1). Schonherr teaches that installing a methyl group will not always lead to an increase in potency but that they must be space in the active site to accommodate the methyl group (page 12258, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12258, column 2, paragraph 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the instantly claimed invention to select the (1R,9S) isomer of Terasawa and substitute the F-ring for a methylated alkylamine as taught by Li and Schonherr to increase potency, stabilize the E-ring to maintain good solubility, and simplify the structure for easier derivatization for SAR purposes to arrive at instant claim 1 (Compound 1). One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a selection, with a reasonable expectation of success, because: Terasawa teaches that camptothecin is a pentacyclic alkaloid with antitumor activity due to inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis (column 1, lines 25-29); Terasawa teaches that camptothecin is scarcely soluble in water, which is a problem for administration to a patient (column 1, lines 40-41); Terasawa teaches that opening of the lactone and converting to sodium carbonate provides a water-soluble camptothecin derivative but that derivation exhibits greatly reduced antitumor activity (column 1, lines 42-46); Terasawa teaches camptothecin derivatives that retain the lactone for activity whilst increasing solubility (column 1, lines 51-58); Terasawa teaches Example 50: PNG media_image6.png 215 466 media_image6.png Greyscale , which has an unspecified amine stereocenter and both diastereomers are obtained: PNG media_image7.png 218 459 media_image7.png Greyscale (1S,9S) and PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47); accordingly, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47); Li teaches camptothecin derivatives and antibody-drug conjugates and structure-activity relationships (SAR) therein; Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives bind to topisomerase I/DNA complex to prevent reannealing, which can cause cell death due to partially cleaved DNA; Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives have at least five rings (A-E) and that the E-ring is in equilibrium between the closed and open forms: PNG media_image4.png 163 329 media_image4.png Greyscale ; Li teaches that the E-ring when open is reported to be far less active, because it’s charge inhibits diffusion into cells and >99% of it is bound by human serum albumin in plasma; Li teaches that the fluorine substituent on the A ring at the C11 position typically increase cytotoxicity several fold and that the selectivity at C20, must be in the (S) configuration ((9S) in Terasawa); Li teaches that exatecan bears an additional F ring (“F-ring”) and was found to be less prone to hydrolysis in human plasma (~30% remaining in the E-ring) and attributed the lactone stability to the C11 fluorine and F-ring; Li teaches that the F-ring is not required for E-ring stabilization and that the F-ring complicates synthetic efforts and SAR studies; Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale ; additionally, Li teaches that more hydrophobic analogs had higher potencies against the two cancer cell lines tested; Schonherr teaches that the phenomenon characterized in medicinal chemistry as the magic methyl effect on potency; Schonherr teaches that the methyl group is one of the most prevalent functionalities in biologically active molecules, which are commonly installed to improve a molecule’s biological activity and physical properties; Schonherr teaches that methylation is used to optimize many properties of a drug candidate, such as methylating next to a metabolic hot spot to sterically block metabolism and lengthen half-life; Schonherr teaches that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets; Schonherr teaches the improvements in binding affinity observed upon introducing a methyl group have been attributed to desolvation effects; Schonherr teaches that methylation energetically favors binding and lowers the IC50 value; Schonherr teaches that estimates place the value for ΔΔG_transfer upon a proton for methyl replacement at about 0.8 kcal/mol for transfer from water to a protein and that this corresponds to an approximate 3.5-fold boost in potency from methylation based on ΔΔG_transfer alone; however, Schonherr teaches that the effect may even be greater in that a single methyl group may boost potency approximately 10-fold if the new methyl group sits nicely in a hydrophobic pocket of the active site; and Schonherr teaches that installing a methyl group will not always lead to an increase in potency but that they must be space in the active site to accommodate the methyl group. Thus, an artisan having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a selection to predictably arrive at Compound 1: PNG media_image1.png 124 209 media_image1.png Greyscale , which is a compound of Formula (I). Claims 1-18 and 21-22 are pending. Claims 12 and 14-17 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group (Group II: claim 12; Group III: claims 14-15; Group IV: claim 16; Group V: claim 17), there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claims 19-20 were canceled. Claims 1-11, 13, 18, and 21-22 are under consideration in the instant office action. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statements filed 19 August 2024 and 14 Mar 2026 and the references cited therein have been considered, unless indicated otherwise. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 1. Claim(s) 1-11, 13, 18, and 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Terasawa (U.S. Patent No. 5,834,476, issued 10 Nov 1998) in view of Li (ACS Med. Chem. Lett.¸2019, 10, 1386-1392) and Schonherr (ACIE, 2013, 52, 12256-12267) as evidenced by American Pharmaceutical Review (“Diluent Excipient,” American Pharmaceutical Review, 2026, <americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/pfu/7964385/soids/1402534/Excipient_Search/Diluent>, accessed 17 June 2026) and DC Fine Chemicals (“Excipients: what they are and their importance in the pharmaceutical industry,” DC Fine Chemicals, 16 Sept 2024, <www.dcfinechemicals.com/en/blog/excipients-their-importance-pharmaceutical-industry/>, accessed 17 June 2026). Terasawa teaches derivatives of camptothecin that are water-soluble with excellent antitumor activity and a high degree of safety: PNG media_image2.png 185 221 media_image2.png Greyscale (abstract). Terasawa teaches that camptothecin is a pentacyclic alkaloid with antitumor activity due to inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis (column 1, lines 25-29). Terasawa teaches that camptothecin is scarcely soluble in water, which is a problem for administration to a patient (column 1, lines 40-41). Terasawa teaches that opening of the lactone and converting to sodium carbonate provides a water-soluble camptothecin derivative but that derivation exhibits greatly reduced antitumor activity (column 1, lines 42-46). Terasawa teaches camptothecin derivatives that retain the lactone for activity whilst increasing solubility (column 1, lines 51-58). Terasawa teaches Example 50: PNG media_image6.png 215 466 media_image6.png Greyscale , which has an unspecified amine stereocenter and both diastereomers are obtained: PNG media_image7.png 218 459 media_image7.png Greyscale (1S,9S) and PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47). Accordingly, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47). Regarding claim 1, Terasawa fails to teach a compound wherein R4 and R5 are not linked together to form the F-ring. Li teaches camptothecin derivatives and antibody-drug conjugates and structure-activity relationships (SAR) therein (abstract; Figure 1, page 1836; page 1387, column 1, paragraphs 1-3; page 1387, paragraph 1). Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives bind to topisomerase I/DNA complex to prevent reannealing, which can cause cell death due to partially cleaved DNA (page 1386, column 1, paragraph 2). Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives have at least five rings (A-E) and that the E-ring is in equilibrium between the closed and open forms: PNG media_image4.png 163 329 media_image4.png Greyscale (page 1386, column 1, paragraph 2; page 1386, Figure 1). Li teaches that the E-ring when open is reported to be far less active, because it’s charge inhibits diffusion into cells and >99% of it is bound by human serum albumin in plasma (page 1386, column 2, paragraph 1). Li teaches that the fluorine substituent on the A ring at the C11 position typically increase cytotoxicity several fold and that the selectivity at C20, must be in the (S) configuration ((9S) in Terasawa); page 1386, column 2, paragraph 1; page 1387, column 2, paragraph 1). Li teaches that exatecan bears an additional F ring (“F-ring”) and was found to be less prone to hydrolysis in human plasma (~30% remaining in the E-ring) and attributed the lactone stability to the C11 fluorine and F-ring (page 1387, column 1, paragraph 1). Li teaches that the F-ring is not required for E-ring stabilization and that the F-ring complicates synthetic efforts and SAR studies (page 1387, column 1, paragraph 3; page 1387, column 2, paragraph 1; page 1391, column 1, paragraph 2). Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387). Additionally, Li teaches that more hydrophobic analogs had higher potencies against the two cancer cell lines tested (page 1389, column 2, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches the phenomenon characterized in medicinal chemistry as the magic methyl effect on potency (abstract). Schonherr teaches that the methyl group is one of the most prevalent functionalities in biologically active molecules, which are commonly installed to improve a molecule’s biological activity and physical properties (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 1). Schonherr teaches that methylation is used to optimize many properties of a drug candidate, such as methylating next to a metabolic hot spot to sterically block metabolism and lengthen half-life (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1). Schonherr teaches the improvements in binding affinity observed upon introducing a methyl group have been attributed to desolvation effects (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches that methylation energetically favors binding and lowers the IC50 value (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2). Schonherr teaches that estimates place the value for ΔΔG_transfer upon a proton for methyl replacement at about 0.8 kcal/mol for transfer from water to a protein and that this corresponds to an approximate 3.5-fold boost in potency from methylation based on ΔΔG_transfer alone (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2). However, Schonherr teaches that the effect may even be greater in that a single methyl group may boost potency approximately 10-fold if the new methyl group sits nicely in a hydrophobic pocket of the active site (page 12257, column 2, paragraph 2; page 12258, column 1, paragraph 1). Schonherr teaches that installing a methyl group will not always lead to an increase in potency because there must be space in the active site to accommodate the methyl group (page 12258, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12258, column 2, paragraph 1), which Terasawa shows that there is space for incorporation of a methyl (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the instantly claimed invention to select the (1R,9S) isomer of Terasawa and substitute the F-ring for a methylated alkylamine as taught by Li and Schonherr to increase potency, stabilize the E-ring to maintain good solubility, and simplify the structure for easier derivatization for SAR purposes to arrive at instant claim 1 (Compound 1). One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a selection, with a reasonable expectation of success, because: -Terasawa teaches derivatives of camptothecin that are water-soluble with excellent antitumor activity and a high degree of safety: PNG media_image2.png 185 221 media_image2.png Greyscale , -Terasawa teaches that camptothecin is a pentacyclic alkaloid with antitumor activity due to inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis, -Terasawa teaches that camptothecin is scarcely soluble in water, which is a problem for administration to a patient, -Terasawa teaches that opening of the lactone and converting to sodium carbonate provides a water-soluble camptothecin derivative but that derivation exhibits greatly reduced antitumor activity, -Terasawa teaches camptothecin derivatives that retain the lactone for activity whilst increasing solubility, -Terasawa teaches Example 50: PNG media_image6.png 215 466 media_image6.png Greyscale , which has an unspecified amine stereocenter and both diastereomers are obtained: PNG media_image7.png 218 459 media_image7.png Greyscale (1S,9S) and PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S), -Li teaches camptothecin derivatives and antibody-drug conjugates and structure-activity relationships (SAR) therein, -Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives bind to topisomerase I/DNA complex to prevent reannealing, which can cause cell death due to partially cleaved DNA, -Li teaches that camptothecin and its derivatives have at least five rings (A-E) and that the E-ring is in equilibrium between the closed and open forms: PNG media_image4.png 163 329 media_image4.png Greyscale , -Li teaches that the E-ring when open is reported to be far less active, because it’s charge inhibits diffusion into cells and >99% of it is bound by human serum albumin in plasma, -Li teaches that the fluorine substituent on the A ring at the C11 position typically increase cytotoxicity several fold and that the selectivity at C20, must be in the (S) configuration ((9S) in Terasawa), -Li teaches that exatecan bears an additional F ring (“F-ring”) and was found to be less prone to hydrolysis in human plasma (~30% remaining in the E-ring) and attributed the lactone stability to the C11 fluorine and F-ring, -Li teaches that the F-ring is not required for E-ring stabilization and that the F-ring complicates synthetic efforts and SAR studies, -Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale , -Li teaches that more hydrophobic analogs had higher potencies against the two cancer cell lines tested, -Schonherr teaches that the phenomenon characterized in medicinal chemistry as the magic methyl effect on potency, -Schonherr teaches that the methyl group is one of the most prevalent functionalities in biologically active molecules, which are commonly installed to improve a molecule’s biological activity and physical properties, -Schonherr teaches that methylation is used to optimize many properties of a drug candidate, such as methylating next to a metabolic hot spot to sterically block metabolism and lengthen half-life, -Schonherr teaches that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets, -Schonherr teaches the improvements in binding affinity observed upon introducing a methyl group have been attributed to desolvation effects, -Schonherr teaches that methylation energetically favors binding and lowers the IC50 value, -Schonherr teaches that estimates place the value for ΔΔG_transfer upon a proton for methyl replacement at about 0.8 kcal/mol for transfer from water to a protein and that this corresponds to an approximate 3.5-fold boost in potency from methylation based on ΔΔG_transfer alone, -Schonherr teaches that the effect may even be greater in that a single methyl group may boost potency approximately 10-fold if the new methyl group sits nicely in a hydrophobic pocket of the active site, and -Schonherr teaches that installing a methyl group will not always lead to an increase in potency but that they must be space in the active site to accommodate the methyl group. Thus, an artisan having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a selection to predictably arrive at Compound 1: PNG media_image1.png 124 209 media_image1.png Greyscale . Regarding claim 2, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R0 is C1-4 alkyl (ethyl), R1 is H, R2 is halogen (F), R3 is alkyl (methyl), and R4 is H. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is H, R8 is H, and R9 is H. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is alkyl (methyl). Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches R0 is C1-4 alkyl (ethyl), R1 is H, R2 is halogen (F), R3 is alkyl (methyl), R4 is H, R6 is H, R7 is alkyl (methyl), R8 is H, and R9 is H. Regarding claim 3, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R2 is halogen (F), R3 is alkyl (methyl), and R4 is H. Regarding claim 4, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47) with stereochemistry (R) at R5. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is H. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches R5 is PNG media_image8.png 76 69 media_image8.png Greyscale . Regarding claim 5, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R0 is ethyl, R1 is hydrogen, R2 is fluorine, R3 is methyl, R4 is hydrogen, A is oxygen, Z is a hydroxyl, and m is 0. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, m is 0, and x is 0. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches R0 is ethyl, R1 is hydrogen, R2 is F, R3 is methyl, R4 is hydrogen, R5 is PNG media_image9.png 43 56 media_image9.png Greyscale , R6 is hydrogen, R7 is methyl, R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, A is oxygen, m is 0, and Z is a hydroxyl. Regarding claim 6, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R1 is hydrogen, R2 is fluorine, R3 is methyl, and R4 is hydrogen. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches a compound of Formula (II): PNG media_image10.png 128 201 media_image10.png Greyscale . Regarding claim 7, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R2 is fluorine, R3 is methyl, and R4 is hydrogen. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches a compound of Formula (III): PNG media_image11.png 126 185 media_image11.png Greyscale , wherein R2 is halogen (F), R3 is alkyl (methyl), R4 is hydrogen, R5 is PNG media_image8.png 76 69 media_image8.png Greyscale , R6 is hydrogen, R7 is alkyl (methyl), R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Regarding claim 8, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R2 is fluorine and R3 is methyl. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, m is 0, and x is 0. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches a compound of Formula (IV): PNG media_image12.png 130 199 media_image12.png Greyscale , wherein R2 is halogen (F), R3 is alkyl (methyl), R5 is PNG media_image8.png 76 69 media_image8.png Greyscale , R6 is hydrogen, R7 is alkyl (methyl), R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, and x is 0. Regarding claim 9, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R2 is fluorine, R3 is methyl, and R4 is hydrogen. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches a compound of Formula (I-1): PNG media_image13.png 136 198 media_image13.png Greyscale , wherein R2 is F, R3 is methyl, R4 is H, R5 is PNG media_image8.png 76 69 media_image8.png Greyscale , R6 is hydrogen, R7 is alkyl (methyl), R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Regarding claim 10, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R2 is fluorine and R3 is methyl. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches a compound of Formula (V): PNG media_image14.png 130 196 media_image14.png Greyscale , wherein R2 is F, R3 is methyl, R4 is H, and R5 is PNG media_image15.png 41 46 media_image15.png Greyscale , R6 is hydrogen, R7 is methyl, R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Regarding claim 11, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47), wherein R2 is fluorine and R3 is methyl. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, and R9 is hydrogen. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches the compound, PNG media_image16.png 83 106 media_image16.png Greyscale . Regarding claim 13, Terasawa teaching a pharmaceutical preparation as an oral tablet and injections which include auxiliary ingredients such as stabilizers and preservatives (column 70, lines 1-8), which are excipients, as evidenced by American Pharmaceutical Review (page 2, paragraph 1) and DC Fine Chemicals (page 2, paragraph 6). Regarding claim 18, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47) with stereochemistry (R) at R5. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, and x is 0. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches that R5 is PNG media_image17.png 56 57 media_image17.png Greyscale Regarding claim 21, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47) with stereochemistry (R) at R5. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, and x is 0. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches that R5 is PNG media_image18.png 72 74 media_image18.png Greyscale . Regarding claim 22, Terasawa teaches the isomer, PNG media_image3.png 210 469 media_image3.png Greyscale (1R,9S) (column 65, lines 1-15; column 67, lines 45-47) with stereochemistry (R) at R5. Li teaches Compound 10: PNG media_image5.png 61 113 media_image5.png Greyscale (Scheme 1, page 1387), wherein R6 is hydrogen, R8 is hydrogen, R9 is hydrogen, and x is 0. Schonherr teaches that methylation to optimize many properties of a drug candidate and that methylation also has a favorable effect on solubility and selectivity against off-targets (page 12257, column 1, paragraph 2; page 12257, column 2, paragraph 1), wherein R7 is methyl. Accordingly, the combination of Terasawa, Li, and Schonherr teaches that R5 is PNG media_image15.png 41 46 media_image15.png Greyscale . Conclusion No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Madeline M Dekarske whose telephone number is (571)272-1789. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 10am - 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Alstrum-Acevedo can be reached at 571-272-5548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MADELINE M. DEKARSKE/Examiner, Art Unit 1622 /JAMES H ALSTRUM-ACEVEDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
0%
Grant Probability
0%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 9m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month