Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/684,870

ACCESS POINT APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Examiner
LIU, JUNG-JEN
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1070 granted / 1198 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1234
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§103
71.4%
+31.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1198 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Informality 1. Claims 3 and 4 disclose “NAV”, but do not disclose the term represents “Network allocation vector” IN THE CLAIM. Corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 1. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1a. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ahn (US 20250350394 A1). 1b. Summary of the Cited Prior Art Ahn discloses a method for concurrent access for wireless local area network. 1c. Claim Analysis Regarding Claim 1, Ahn discloses: An access point apparatus (Fig 1, PCP/AP-1) for communicating with multiple station apparatuses (Fig 1, STA-1 and STA-2), the access point apparatus comprising: a transmitter (Fig 3, Transceiver 120, Transmitting part) configured to transmit a trigger frame (Fig 9, Trigger Frame 312) triggering frame transmission (Fig 9, UL Data (STA1) and (STA2)) performed by each of the multiple station apparatuses (Fig 9. STA1’s and STA2’s ranges; see: [0089] … the AP transmits an MU-RTS frame 312 configured in the format of a trigger frame for NAV setting in the UL-OFDMA transmission process; Examiner’s Note: the trigger frame 312 triggering uplink transmissions UL-OFDMA from STA1 and STA2); and a receiver (Fig 3, Transceiver 120, Receiving part) configured to perform carrier sense (Fig 6, [0031] FIG. 6 illustrates a carrier sense multiple access (CSMA)/collision avoidance (CA) method used in wireless LAN communication) to reserve multiple radio resources (see: [0093] … the STAs being allocated the resource unit in the UL-OFDMA transmission process transmit a simultaneous CTS frame 322 after SIFS from the reception of the MU-RTS frame 312, and transmit UL data frame 332) in time periods with different lengths (Fig 9, NAVs; see: [0096] … terminals receiving the trigger frame 400 set a NAV based on the duration field of the corresponding trigger frame 400); wherein the trigger frame (Fig 10, Trigger Frame 400) includes information indicating the time periods (Fig 10, Duration) for the multiple radio resources reserved by the receiver (see: [0093] … the STAs being allocated the resource unit in the UL-OFDMA transmission process). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 2a. Claims 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ahn (US 20250350394 A1) in view of Lou (US 20200037356 A1). 2b. Summary of the Cited Prior Art Ahn discloses a method for concurrent access for wireless local area network. Lou discloses a method for multi-user concurrent random access for wireless local area network. 2c. Claim Analysis Regarding Claim 2, Ahn discloses: wherein the trigger frame (Fig 9, Trigger Frame 312) is configured to configure first communication that is communication between the multiple station apparatuses (Fig 19 (a)-(d), communication between STAs; see: [0154] First, FIG. 19(a) illustrates a situation in which seven STAs have OBO counters of six or less while six resource units are selected as random access resource units. Examiner’s Note: OBO: OFDMA BackOff counter in [0146]) and second communication (Fig 9, communication between AP and STA1 STA2), that is communication between the access point apparatus and the multiple station apparatuses, and (see: [0091] The STAs (i.e., STA1, STA2) receiving the MU-RTS frame 312 from the AP transmit a simultaneous CTS frame 322); the trigger frame includes information associated with transmit power for a frame where the first communication is configured. Ahn does not disclose about transmit power. However, Lou discloses transmit power: the trigger frame (Figs 3A-3B) includes information associated with transmit power for a frame where the first communication is configured (see: [0079] For both of the trigger frames 300A and 300B, the common information field 310, 326 may include different types of information, such as a sequence number and/or trigger token, common transmit power control (TPC) indices). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to integrate Ahn’s method for concurrent access for wireless local area network with Lou’s method for multi-user concurrent random access for wireless with the motivation being to enhance high efficiency wireless local area network (Lou, [0066]) Regarding Claim 3, Ahn discloses: wherein the information described in the trigger frame (Fig 10, trigger frame) and indicating the time periods (Fig 10, Duration) triggers configuration of NAVs with different attributes for the station apparatus having received the trigger frame (Fig 9, various NAV durations; see: [0096] … the corresponding trigger frame 400 is an MU-RTS frame, and terminals receiving the trigger frame 400 set a NAV based on the duration field of the corresponding trigger frame 400). Regarding Claim 4, Ahn discloses: wherein an attribute of a NAV (Fig 9, NAVs) triggered by the trigger frame (Fig 9, Trigger Frame 312) is a NAV that is allowed to be updated by a station apparatus (see: [0091] … The neighboring terminals of STA1 and STA2 set a NAV until the end of the UL-OFDMA session based on the duration field of the simultaneous CTS frame 322. Examiner’s Note: NAVs are set or updated by stations base on the received CTS) where the first communication is configured (Fig 19 (a)-(d), communication between STAs). Regarding Claim 5, the claim discloses similar features as of Claim 1, and is rejected accordingly. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jung-Jen Liu whose telephone number is 571-270-7643. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang B. Yao can be reached on 571-272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUNG LIU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604207
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING AN INTEGRATED NETWORK AND SYSTEM PLANNING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604332
TECHNIQUES FOR SENDING ASSISTANCE INFORMATION FOR CANCELLING INTERFERENCE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603695
Reconfigurable Wireless Radio System for Providing Highly Sensitive Nationwide Radar Functionality Using a Limited Number of Frequencies and Adaptable Hardware
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593241
COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NON-DISRUPTIVE CAC ON A NETWORK VIA MLO FUNCTIONALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593375
METHOD OF DETECTING STATUS OF USER OUTSIDE VEHICLE, SYSTEM, STORAGE MEDIUM AND VEHICLE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month