Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/684,916

DATA PROCESSING METHOD, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROCESSOR

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Examiner
DUDEK JR, EDWARD J
Art Unit
2132
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Hangzhou Alicloud Feitian Information Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
983 granted / 1102 resolved
+34.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1134
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1102 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to the request for continued examination filed 19 November 2025. Claims 1, 4-8, 10-14 and 17-21 are pending and have been presented for examination. Claims 2, 3, 9, 15 and 16 have been cancelled. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 24 October 2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 10-11, filed 24 October 2025, with respect to claims 1, 11 and 14 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1, 11 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. As per claim 12, the claim is rejected because the applicant has provided evidence that the applicant intends the term “Computer Readable Storage Medium” to include non-statutory subject matter. The applicant describes a computer readable storage medium as including open ended language and thus it is reasonable to interpret it to include all possible mediums, including non-statutory mediums (see paragraphs [0156], [0200], [0220]). The words "storage" and/or "recording" are insufficient to convey only statutory embodiments to one of ordinary skill in the art absent an explicit and deliberate limiting definition or clear differentiation between storage media and transitory media in the disclosure. As such, the claim(s) is/are drawn to a form of energy. Energy is not one of the four categories of invention and therefore this /these claim(s) is/are non-statutory. Energy is not a series of steps or acts and this is not a process. Energy is not a physical article or object and as such is not a machine or manufacture. Energy is not a combination of substances and therefore not a composition of matter. The Examiner suggests amending the claim(s) to read as a “non-transitory Computer Readable Storage Medium.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4-8, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 17-21 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The state of the art fails to anticipate, or render obvious, “… writing metadata corresponding to the target data into the second persistent memory region through a processor, wherein the metadata is used for describing the target data and the processor does not cache the metadata, and wherein the second persistent memory region serves as a top-level connection between an input-output hierarchical system and a CPU/memory system.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD J DUDEK JR whose telephone number is (571)270-1030. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00A-4:00P. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hosain T Alam can be reached at 571-272-3978. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD J DUDEK JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2132
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Jun 18, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §101
Oct 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596477
MEMORY DEVICE LOG DATA STORAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596504
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR COMPUTATIONAL STORAGE FUNCTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578891
ASSIGNING BLOCKS OF MEMORY SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572280
MEMORY CONTROLLER AND NEAR-MEMORY SUPPORT FOR SPARSE ACCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12572302
PARTITIONED TRANSFERRING FOR WRITE BOOSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1102 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month