Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/685,066

DOWNHOLE CAMERA ENHANCED MANIPULATION TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Priority
Aug 19, 2021 — GB 2111886.4 +2 more
Examiner
LAMBE, PATRICK F
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
E V Offshore Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
366 granted / 587 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.6%
+44.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 587 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/6/26 has been entered. The amended claims filed 2/6/26 are acknowledged; claims 1, 2, 4-10, 12-17, 19-21, 26, and 27 are currently pending. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16, 17, 19-21, and 26 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-8, 15, and 27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rodriquez (US 20210156232). CLAIM 1: Rodriquez discloses a manipulation element for a downhole tool as shown in part by Fig. 2A and B below. The language of “the downhole tool comprising a camera assembly including a lens” is part of the preamble and does not physically limit the scope of the claim as the claimed elements constitute a manipulation element on their own and the limitations of the downhole tool are solely within the preamble). PNG media_image1.png 816 529 media_image1.png Greyscale The manipulation element comprises a root portion (base of 121) connectable to said downhole tool (housing 210). The root portion including an attachment portion at a proximal end of the manipulation element for engagement with the downhole tool (see Fig. 2B). The root portion including an aperture (see Fig. 2B showing open axis 250) for receiving a part of the camera assembly therethrough such that, in use, said lens is disposed forward of the root portion (the aperture is sized to fit a camera lens; the lens is not positively claimed). A stem portion extending from the root portion to a tip at a distal end of the manipulation element (along 121). The stem portion including a hollow or gap aligned with the aperture (see Fig. 2B) for receiving, in use, said lens (again, the lens not being positively claimed), and a manipulation surface having an edge at the tip and the manipulation surface extending from the tip towards the root portion (see Fig. 2B). The manipulation surface extending at an angle of greater than 0 and less than 90 to a longitudinal axis of the manipulation element so that the manipulation surface crosses a plane containing the longitudinal axis at an oblique angle such that the tip is on a first side of the plane containing longitudinal axis and a proximal part of the manipulation surface furthest from the tip is on an opposite side of the plane containing the longitudinal axis, wherein the proximal part is closer to the root portion than to the tip (see Fig. 2B). CLAIM 2: The manipulation element is of unitary construction (see Fig. 2B). CLAIM 5: The tip is offset from longitudinal axis in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axis (see Fig. 2B). CLAIM 6: No part of the stem portion lies on the longitudinal axis such that the longitudinal axis is unobstructed (see Fig. 2B). CLAIM 7: The stem portion is in the form of a hollow cylindrical wedge and the manipulation surface is provided by an edge surface of the hollow cylindrical wedge (see Fig.2B). CLAIM 8: The hollow is at least partially bounded by a curved inner surface of the stem portion (See Fib. 2B). CLAIM 15: The manipulation surface is planar (see Fig. 2B, showing planar top). CLAIM 27: The manipulation surface is at a forward most surface of the manipulation element and the manipulation surface extends continuously an entire length of the stem between the tip and the root portion (see Fig. 2B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 9, 10. And 12-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rodriquez in view of Cowie (WO 2014135861A2). CLAIM 9: The tip is part of a tip portion of the manipulation element (see Rodriquez, Fig. 2B). Rodriquez fails to disclose the stem portion comprises a pair of arms extending between the root portion and the tip portion. Cowie discloses a wireline device. Cowie discloses a tool with a root portion (46), a stem portion (48), and a tip (44). The stem portion is two arms extending between the root and tip (see Fig. 11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the stem portion of Rodriquez to have the two arms of Cowie as the substitution of one known stem portion for another as Cowie teaches the arms allow for the movement of another portion (specifically a spring) in the body area of the tool. CLAIM 10: The arms are elongate and extend substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis (see Cowie, Fig. 11). CLAIM 12: The tip portion comprises curved inner and outer surfaces, and a center of a radius of curvature of each of the inner and outer surfaces lies on or proximate the longitudinal axis (see Rodriquez, Fig. 2B). CLAIM 13: The tip portion has the shape of a hollow cylindrical wedge and includes a U-shaped forward-facing surface, facing generally in a direction away from the root portion (see Rodriquez, Fig. 2B). CLAIM 14: The tip portion includes a forward-facing surface facing generally in a direction away from the root portion (see Rodriquez Figs. 2B), and the manipulation surface includes the forward-facing surface of the tip portion and the second surfaces of each of the arms (see Rodriquez, Fig. 2B). Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rodriquez. CLAIM 4: Rodriquez fails to disclose wherein the attachment portion includes a threaded portion. Examiner takes official notice that threaded attachments are well known in the art as a means of securing tubular parts. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the attachment of the tool and element to be threaded with a reasonable expectation of success as the well known threaded connection would secure the two parts together and allow for proper use of the tool. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 2/6/26, with respect to Claims 16, 17, 19-21, and 26 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of 11/7/25 has been withdrawn. With respect to independent claim 1 and the claims dependent thereon, the arguments were not persuasive. The structural elements of the manipulation tool are known in the art as discussed above. However, the combination of the tool and the camera would be non-obvious. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK F LAMBE whose telephone number is (571)270-1932. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 10-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at (571)270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK F LAMBE/Examiner, Art Unit 3676 /TARA SCHIMPF/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Apr 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 07, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631096
SUBSEA PUMPING AND BOOSTER SYSTEM
4y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12618316
DOWNHOLE SAND TRAP
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618314
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AUTOMATED AND INTELLIGENT FRAC PUMPING
1y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618729
SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MONITORING SUPPORT PLATFORM STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS
1y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12595711
CUTTING TOOL AND CONTROLS FOR DOWNHOLE MECHANICAL SERVICES
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+29.2%)
2y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 587 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month