Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/685,240

PREPARATION METHOD FOR POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL PRECURSOR HAVING LARGE CHANNEL, AND APPLICATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Priority
Jan 24, 2022 — CN 202210077149.4 +1 more
Examiner
RUMP, RICHARD M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hunan Brunp EV Recycling Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
804 granted / 1078 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1078 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Status of Application Claims 1-20 are pending and presented for examination. The preliminary amendment dated 21 February 2024 adding claims 14-20 and amending claim 13 is acknowledged and entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5, 6 and 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claims 5 and 6, it is indefinite as it recites in S1 a molar ratio of acetic acid to cobalt ions, but this is not in step S1, this is a step prior to step S1 and thusly “in S1” should be removed which is how it is being treated for the purposes of compact prosecution. Claims 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101/112(b) as they recite a “use” without setting forth the required method steps to cover the use (see MPEP 2173.05(q)). The claims should be drawn to “A method of preparing a lithium-ion battery (LIB) comprising . . . “ the language of claim 1 followed by what forms it into the LIB. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 and 7-12 are allowed. As to claim 1 (and those dependent thereon), none of the cited prior art either alone or in combination discloses a method of making a long channeled cathode material comprising mixing sodium hexanitrocobaltate aqueous solution with a Mn-Ni mixed salt solution, oxalic acid, and ammonium hydroxide under pH control and solid-liquid separation followed by calcination and soaking of the calcined material in water. CN101215011 (cited and provided by Applicants) is the closest piece of prior art and it discloses making a cathode material (lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide) by reacting aceates of nickel, cobalt, and manganese in a solvent of DI water and a complexing agent to control the pH before being calcined. It does not expressly state usage of sodium hexanitrocobaltate nor soaking in water. Conclusion Claims 1-4 and 7-12 are allowed. Claims 5, 6 and 13-20 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD M RUMP whose telephone number is (571)270-5848. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 06:45 AM to 04:45 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RICHARD M. RUMP Primary Examiner Art Unit 1759 /RICHARD M RUMP/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698212
METHOD FOR FABRICATING TRIHALODISILANE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692163
ANODE PARTICLES INCLUDING DISCARDED GRAPHITE PARTICLES, AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THE SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678766
CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND FLUORINE-CONTAINING ORGANIC COMPOUND REMOVING MATERIAL, WATER PURIFICATION FILTER, AND WATER PURIFIER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673317
PROCESS FOR RECOVERING AND REGENERATING A CATALYST FROM ASH
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673314
SUPPORTED CATALYST AND METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING SUCROSE-6-ESTER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+20.1%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1078 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month