Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/685,490

IN-VEHICLE DEVICE ATTACHMENT STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
AKAKPO, DANY E
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
457 granted / 523 resolved
+35.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
563
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 523 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The preliminary amendments filed on 02/21/2024 have been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (CN111267743A). Regarding claim 1, Zhang discloses an in-vehicle device attachment structure comprising: a retrofit device attachment portion (100) provided in a vehicle (abstract): an intermediate base plate (200) attached to the retrofit device attachment portion (fig 1); and a retrofit device (300) attached to the intermediate base plate (fig 1). Regarding claim 2, Zhang further discloses that the retrofit device attachment portion includes a first rail (100, left, fig 1) that supports one lateral side of the intermediate base plate and a second rail (100, right, fig 1) that supports another lateral side of the intermediate base plate (fig 1). Regarding claim 4, Zhang further discloses that the retrofit device attachment portion includes a plurality of base plate attachment portions (groove containing bolt 220 and block 230, fig 4 ) provided at a plurality of positions spaced apart from each other along a longitudinal direction of the first rail and the second rail (figs 1-4 ), and the intermediate base plate is attached to one of the plurality of base plate attachment portions (figs 1-4). Regarding claim 5, Zhang further discloses the intermediate base plate is longer than a distance between the first rail and the second rail in a direction in which the first rail and the second rail are arranged side by side (fig 1). Regarding claim 7, Zhang further discloses an attachment member (220) that attaches the intermediate base plate to the retrofit device attachment portion in an orientation in which attachment/removal can be performed in a horizontal direction (figs 1-6). Regarding claim 8, Zhang further discloses that the intermediate base plate includes a base plate body and a plurality of device attachment portions (holes in 200 containing 220) provided in the base plate body (figs 1-6), and the retrofit device is attached to one of the plurality of device attachment portions (figs 1-6). Regarding claim 9, Zhang further discloses that the retrofit device attachment portions are provided to a roof of the vehicle (abstract). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 111267743 A) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Giavarini (US 20100127128) Regarding claim 3, Zhang is silent regarding the fact that the first rail is longer than the second rail. Giavarini teaches the first rail is longer than the second rail ([0061]). Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Zhang and Giavarini before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Zhang to include rails of different lengths as taught by Giavarini in order to allow the production of a wide variety of configuration ([0061]). Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 111267743 A) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Taylor et al. (US 10800346) Regarding claim 6, Zhang is silent regarding the fact that the first rail and the second rail are arranged side by side in a width direction of the vehicle and extend in a front-rear direction of the vehicle. Taylor teaches the fact that the first rail (16, left, fig 1) and the second rail (16, right, fig 1) are arranged side by side in a width direction of the vehicle and extend in a front-rear direction of the vehicle (fig 1). Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Zhang and Taylor before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Zhang to include the fact that the first rail and the second rail are arranged side by side in a width direction of the vehicle and extend in a front-rear direction of the vehicle as taught by Taylor in order to allow the roof panel to easily match the contours of the vehicle body (col 2 lines 39-54) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANY E AKAKPO whose telephone number is (469)295-9255. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached on (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANY E AKAKPO/Examiner, Art Unit 3672 2/21/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601248
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DRILLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600292
SENSOR AND INDICATOR LIGHT MOUNTING STRUCTURE, AND CARGO HANDLING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590534
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING PLACEMENT OF A DOWNHOLE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590526
WELLBORE DRILL DEVIATION HANDLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590527
ROTARY STEERABLE SYSTEM ADVISOR WITH AUTONOMOUS MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 523 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month